![]() |
Great points. I like the debate so far so don't take what I say personally. I take audio pretty seriously but there is so much mythology I like to set
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Denver
Posts: 169
Drives: 2009 370Z White
Rep Power: 16 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Great points. I like the debate so far so don't take what I say personally. I take audio pretty seriously but there is so much mythology I like to set the record straight whenever I can.
About those paper cones...OEM speakers are paper. The top of the line Alpines from couple years ago were paper (rebranded Scanspeak Revs). So do the OEM's and Alpine not know how to make a proper car speaker? Personally I agree with you guys in that I wouldn't be keen on uncoated paper cones in a car, but I also beleive my concern is probably unfounded. I doubt anyone car audio manufacturer is considering water draining when making a driver. How many coated cloth spiders have you seen? How many woofers have vented (steel!) pole pieces? There simply is no consideration for water in car or home audio. There is in pro audio for at least the front of the driver, with a water resistant coating being applied to most. Mostly it is moot point though, very few drivers are paper anymore. Foam surrounds are nearly impossible to find except a few higher end midrange specific drivers. As far as enclosures there is no real difference, other than some manufacturers using a higher Q in the car audio driver, but that is not universal. It may not even be that common anymore, I don't know. Anyway it's not that useful in era of widespread EQ ability. I would be curious what changes your company made to cone profile due it being a car audio driver and why. I've never seen any manufacturer that makes both home and car audio do such a thing. As a practical matter if things like directivity and proper enclosures are so far down the list of things to consider due to the compromised environment of a car, any percieved differences between car and home drivers must be down in the mud in importance. It's like saying since I have a Yugo things like handling and speed aren't even things to consider worrying about, so I'll just put N2 in the tires because that is one thing I have control of
Last edited by BrandonT; 06-04-2011 at 01:21 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,861
Drives: 90 and 15 GMC Sierra
Rep Power: 423 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
OEM speakers as you mention with a paper cone, so it must be ok, well that’s why they don’t last long, have you ever looked at an OEM speaker that’s been in a car for a few years, it’s destroyed, from moisture. Not to mention the reason we are all here, OEM speakers suck, wonder why? Alpine, have you looked at an Alpine that is a paper cone after a couple years in a car, i have, and it's not very nice, which could be why they USED to did it. As for cabinets, home cabinets are much better built, hell there is one, car speaker are designed to be IB so, as long as you have something to sort of separation the front and rear waves it’s going to work ok. Also JL uses foam surounds on most of their subs. Last edited by 90 ST; 06-04-2011 at 07:56 PM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB: Factory Base Speaker and Tweeter | Carbon_z | Wanted | 2 | 02-15-2011 09:45 PM |
| Question about Speaker Spacer Inner Diameter | Spec Jay | Audio & Video | 6 | 08-24-2010 03:35 PM |
| Factory Nav question | Paul_S | Audio & Video | 15 | 12-28-2009 10:13 AM |
| Amp Speaker Question | bpd138 | Audio & Video | 5 | 05-15-2009 08:14 PM |
| Oz Audio 180cs Speaker Question | zero610 | Audio & Video | 1 | 05-04-2009 11:06 AM |