|
Originally Posted by markesc Version III's are out! TM65 mkIII Woofer – Stereo Integrity Wow. 9mm xmax vs. the 3mm I have... that's wild: https://www.hertzaudiovideo.com/wp-c...rgy_HSK165.pdf Can you please explain why
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-03-2019, 08:37 AM
|
#28 (permalink) | |
|
Track Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Dallas
Posts: 672
Drives: in traffic
Rep Power: 20700   |
Quote:
In calculating their peak diaphragm displacement volume (if I'm getting this right), the TM65 III is at 1258. I've been really happy with my 165's with a noticably lower 390. I just don't know what that means in application. Is it basically having to move 3x less to hit the same frequencies? More efficient, meaning more volume out of the same power? |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MKII Nismo - anyone painted the stock alloys? | mattross1313 | Exterior & Interior | 4 | 07-01-2017 03:33 PM |
| My Custom Build: Focal, Stereo Integrity, Arc, Zapco, Alpine, etc! | butdamnbrian | Audio & Video | 35 | 12-28-2016 05:43 PM |
| Hood integrity | Widdzz | Exterior & Interior | 2 | 10-19-2016 04:31 PM |
| [FOR SALE] Dynaudio System 220 mkII | zentropy | Parts for sale (Private Classifieds) | 11 | 02-13-2013 04:21 PM |
| tx camaro drivers. (oh and STi drivers too) | UNKNOWN_370 | The Lounge (Off Topic) | 3 | 11-09-2011 12:17 AM |
15Likes
Threaded Mode
