Nissan 370Z Forum  

Help!! 1.18???

Originally Posted by cooltoy I think it's offset. 1.18 of an inch = +40. But the fronts 47 and rear is 30. It's a 17 difference which isn't 1.18. It's

Go Back   Nissan 370Z Forum > Nissan 370Z Tech Area > Wheels & Tires


Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-30-2013, 11:25 AM   #1 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
synolimit's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 5,051
Drives: 2013 Silver 370z
Rep Power: 3391
synolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cooltoy View Post
I think it's offset. 1.18 of an inch = +40.
But the fronts 47 and rear is 30. It's a 17 difference which isn't 1.18. It's some kind of ratio I can't figure out.
__________________
13 370z-
synolimit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2013, 03:18 PM   #2 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Mililani, HI
Posts: 1,566
Drives: 2014 Juke Nismo RS
Rep Power: 18
chrischhorn is a splendid one to beholdchrischhorn is a splendid one to beholdchrischhorn is a splendid one to beholdchrischhorn is a splendid one to beholdchrischhorn is a splendid one to beholdchrischhorn is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by synolimit View Post
But the fronts 47 and rear is 30. It's a 17 difference which isn't 1.18. It's some kind of ratio I can't figure out.
closest ratio I can think of that possibly pertains to this situation is tire widths but still its still not an exact match to the 1.18. 275/245 =1.12 but with you speaking of understeer and oversteer, it pertains to the situation. Wider front tire = more understeer.

BTW I just ordered my set of tires. 275/35/18 for the front and 295/35/18 for the rears in the BFGoodrich Rivals for my 18X9.5+35 and 18X10.5+12
__________________

R.I.P. 8/01/13 1SlowZ
One day I'll have another....

Last edited by chrischhorn; 06-30-2013 at 03:20 PM.
chrischhorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2013, 04:50 PM   #3 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
synolimit's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 5,051
Drives: 2013 Silver 370z
Rep Power: 3391
synolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond reputesynolimit has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chrischhorn View Post
closest ratio I can think of that possibly pertains to this situation is tire widths but still its still not an exact match to the 1.18. 275/245 =1.12 but with you speaking of understeer and oversteer, it pertains to the situation. Wider front tire = more understeer.

BTW I just ordered my set of tires. 275/35/18 for the front and 295/35/18 for the rears in the BFGoodrich Rivals for my 18X9.5+35 and 18X10.5+12
Hmm, maybe it was 1.12 then.

Why go for understeer with the larger front tire you ordered? doing the math though 295/275 is only 1.07. so is the lower number more under or oversteer?

I looked at those sizes but I didn't want the front only being 25.6" diameter since OEM is 26.8". I don't think I could even lower the car.
__________________
13 370z-
synolimit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2013, 06:36 PM   #4 (permalink)
A True Z Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Mililani, HI
Posts: 1,566
Drives: 2014 Juke Nismo RS
Rep Power: 18
chrischhorn is a splendid one to beholdchrischhorn is a splendid one to beholdchrischhorn is a splendid one to beholdchrischhorn is a splendid one to beholdchrischhorn is a splendid one to beholdchrischhorn is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by synolimit View Post
Hmm, maybe it was 1.12 then.

Why go for understeer with the larger front tire you ordered? doing the math though 295/275 is only 1.07. so is the lower number more under or oversteer?

I looked at those sizes but I didn't want the front only being 25.6" diameter since OEM is 26.8". I don't think I could even lower the car.
My car is lowered about an inch, maybe a bit lower already. Our cars are front heavy and if you check the track section, most people recommend a 285 or larger for better breaking power on the front. There is a reason a lot of track members are running square setups, not even staggered anymore. Understeer/Oversteer isn't a huge factor for me right now. Having the car bite and control consistently will yield faster times then whether I have more understeer or oversteer.
__________________

R.I.P. 8/01/13 1SlowZ
One day I'll have another....
chrischhorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2