|
While they are more expensive, they are only $100 in total more expensive than the stock Bridgestone RE50As, which only had a 140 wear rating, while the new S-04's have
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
04-11-2011, 09:45 AM
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Base Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: South Riding, VA
Posts: 15
Drives: 09 370z BLK TRG SPT
Rep Power: 17  |
While they are more expensive, they are only $100 in total more expensive than the stock Bridgestone RE50As, which only had a 140 wear rating, while the new S-04's have a 280 wear rating. I did not wish to purchase a less expensive tire that would take away from the handling characteristics of the car. That is why I stayed away from the Conti DW, which everyone rated mediocre under "Steering Response" as compared to others.
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: Bridgestone Potenza (2) Fronts | typeray12 | Parts for sale (Private Classifieds) | 15 | 02-20-2011 05:58 AM |
| FS Bridgestone Potenza RE050A TIRE | ilostmypill | Parts for sale (Private Classifieds) | 1 | 11-10-2010 11:53 AM |
| FS: Bridgestone Potenza RE-11 | batman_4 | Parts for sale (Private Classifieds) | 25 | 11-08-2010 12:22 PM |
| Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position vs Stock - how much better? | kannibul | Wheels & Tires | 4 | 01-16-2010 03:36 PM |
| Bridgestone Potenza RE-11 | EVO_Killer | Wheels & Tires | 15 | 07-05-2009 01:11 PM |
Hybrid Mode
