![]() |
Originally Posted by jrb55gh This post may not be anything special to the track guys, but there is something worth mentioning to the street guys with a 7AT. I just
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: May 2010
Location: nirvana
Posts: 6,394
Drives: 2023 NATM
Rep Power: 419 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Enjoy it. Destroy it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: DFW Texas
Posts: 149
Drives: '13 370z black 7AT
Rep Power: 14 ![]() |
Quote:
I do not have access to the hex files in my Dynotronics tune for the throttle response. However, I can post the data logging graphs of the actual throttle, VVT, VVEL responses to throttle pedal input. Apparently these responses are accomplished by bypassing the Uprev throttle table and directly specifying each parameter in the Ecutek software. The first plot is the throttle opening in degrees (green), VVEL (yellow), VVT (blue) vs. throttle pedal sensor voltage in a 2000 rpm roll on. Idle is about .7 volts and full throttle is about 4.66 volts. The second plot is the standing start data with the VVT (blue) incorporated into the same graph. The third plot is the throttle opening in degrees (green) and VVEL (yellow) vs. throttle pedal sensor voltage in a normal standing start. ![]() ![]()
Last edited by jrb55gh; 05-11-2014 at 12:50 PM. Reason: make photo links public |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 244
Drives: 2013 370Z-TT GT Edt
Rep Power: 3368 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
If I interpret your data correctly, the VVT and VVL reach their final values at around 25% throttle plate position, which means that beyond this point the engine load is indeed controlled by further opening the throttle plate only, not valve lift. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: WI
Posts: 165
Drives: 2015 Q40 / 2008 EX35
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
I did try the map above and it seems like my low end gets a bit smoother than the modified #2, and the mid to top end are a lot better with this map 3.
If I could blend the lowend of map 2 and mid/top end response of map 3, it should have been perfect. Map 2 seems like the best blend of low end street us and highway mid to top end. Map 3 is best for G37 low end gearing, not aggressive enough for my non close gearing 5 speed A/T, but smooth low end with more oomph at the mid to top... Last edited by Awgd8; 09-06-2014 at 01:33 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 370Z FI Throttle Response: Boost vs. Throttle Position | DIGItonium | Forced Induction | 9 | 01-23-2011 08:49 PM |
| Adjusting Throttle Response with UpRev? | AlphaSnacks | Tuning | 4 | 12-05-2010 03:40 AM |
| 2nd gear not as smooth as the others??? | VQinside | Engine & Drivetrain | 14 | 11-03-2010 09:22 PM |
| UpRev Osiris/Technosquare users- throttle mapping? | SE | Tuning | 3 | 08-29-2010 05:03 PM |
| Smooth launch in 1st Gear? | BrianMSmith | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 22 | 03-26-2010 10:40 PM |