I ran across an old friend that had purchased a 1992 nsx since the last time I had seen him and omg those things must have been the shiznits back
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-26-2010, 12:53 AM | #1 (permalink) |
Track Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 974
Drives: 2014 Alpha7 GTR
Rep Power: 16 |
370 Nismo vs. NSX
I ran across an old friend that had purchased a 1992 nsx since the last time I had seen him and omg those things must have been the shiznits back in those days! If he would of caught me slip'n I might of been seeing tail lights. I didnt talk to him long so I dont know if he had any aftermarket stuff. I have HFC's and CAI. Are the older nsx usually that quick or do yall think he had some extra's. Either way it was good times.
|
09-26-2010, 01:34 AM | #2 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,131
Drives: Juke/240Z
Rep Power: 848 |
well its about even.. 92 NSX 1/4 mile is high 13's - where the Z is more mid to low 13's .. hes got about 300-400lbs less then you but you got 60 hp more them him.. drivers race..
__________________
Juke AWD/240Z SR20 08 Evo 10(Stage 2) SOLD Fastest Sport 6spd 370Z 11.8 @126.5SOLD Last edited by Brazilbro; 09-26-2010 at 01:58 AM. |
09-26-2010, 02:23 AM | #3 (permalink) |
Track Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 626
Drives: '10 370z PW 7AT
Rep Power: 16 |
The Z would not be able to keep up on a track. NSX's were one of the best handling cars ever made. Even with its low hp, it took care of porsches and ferraris back in the day. I think stock older NSX's dyno about 240 so it would be very close in a straight line with its weight advantage.
__________________
PW 7AT w/Sports Pkg Hook Em! |
09-26-2010, 02:31 AM | #4 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Jose
Posts: 249
Drives: 09 370z PW 6MT
Rep Power: 16 |
I used to own an NA2 NSX (290hp engine). The car was pretty quick. I would say it is about as fast as my current Z. I would say it is a drivers race. Did you guys race each other and from what speeds?
__________________
Cars owned: DC2/AP1/NA2/FG2/Z33/Z34/R35 |
09-26-2010, 03:30 AM | #5 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,134
Drives: 2009 Touring Sp Nav
Rep Power: 17 |
I would expect the NSX to be slower in a straight line, but I think for a low torque car the NSX is a little easier to be aggressive in - feel like you have to really take the Z to redline for it to go quickly. Haven't driven the Z aggressively enough to say how curves would be, but it definitely doesn't feel as easy as an NSX in corners.
__________________
2014 Cayman S PDK Sport Chrono White/Black Was 2009 370Z Touring Sport+Nav 7AT Metallic Black/Persimmon Was 1991 NSX Auto Black/Black |
09-26-2010, 08:30 AM | #6 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 34
Drives: 370Z NISMO #354
Rep Power: 15 |
RE: NSX VS. Nismo
I previously owned, modified and tracked 3 NSXs and am the current owner of a 370Z Nismo.
On average, a stock first gen NSX (91-96, 270 HP, 5 speed) was typically capable of 13.7s @ 105-106 mph, while later generations (290 HP, 6 speed) were typically capable of 13.2s @ 107-108 mph. From the standpoint of comparison, the Nismo is faster (in a straight line)than my stock 92 NSX and on a par with my later generation models. From the standpoint of handling comparison between the cars, one must note that each generation of NSX demonstrated different handling characteristics. The first gen NSXs were purely Coupes; the 91-93 models had 15"/16" diameter wheels, the 94 had 16"/17" wheels. Overall, these NSXs were superior in steering/handling when compared to the Nismo. However, when these NSX owners replaced their rolling stock with 18"/19" wheels and latest tires, it greatly improved their capability. The 95-96 NSXs were Targa only and suffered from terrible cowl and chassis flex. With the Targa roof off, I could not windshield mount my radar detector as it bounced around. Handling of these cars suffered as a result and was inferior in virtually all respects to the Nismo. The 1997 and later NSX Targas received far better chassis reinforcement and were very good handling machines-better in most (but not all) aspects when compared to the Nismo. The real handling/steering stars were the rare, special order 1997 and later Coupes-most especially the limited edition 1999 Zanardi and the post-2002 models. These cars, when equipped with the best tires were terrific machines in all respects. |
09-26-2010, 10:48 AM | #7 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 160
Drives: Nissan
Rep Power: 16 |
First gen NSXs are about on par with a 350Z stock vs stock. 2nd gen NSXs are about on par with a 370Z stock vs stock with the 370Z having the edge. Handling is close between the two.
|
09-26-2010, 09:34 PM | #8 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL
Posts: 260
Drives: '10 BC 370z Roadster
Rep Power: 16 |
Awwhhhhh... The good ol days of the NSX!!!
__________________
Meet HaZy: 2010 Black Cherry 370z Roadster - S-Tune Body Kit - 5:AD Bronze 19" Rims - K&N Filters - Euro Fog Lamp - Full LED |
09-26-2010, 09:44 PM | #9 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Not in Sunny Florida
Posts: 6,358
Drives: 16 Nismo w/Tech Pack
Rep Power: 4500 |
The NSX was never a race car, the power is not there and it doesn't impress me for a suppossed "super car". On it days was way to pricey.
On the other hand on the twistys is a different story.
__________________
2009 370Z MB Base w/Sport Package 6MT Modshack's Custom Air Intakes /3M Clear Bra/ Illuminated Kick Plates / F. I CBE w/12" resonators / EVO-R Front Lip / Rear Hatch Wing / Tein S-Tech Springs /Ilegal Tint in the Rep. of VA/4x20mm Z1 Spacers/ Vinyl Roof/Liquid Carbon Designs |
09-26-2010, 10:35 PM | #10 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 112
Drives: 03 G35 black 5AT
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
Crazy how a 20 year old car (NSX) still competes with a modern true sports car(370z) |
|
09-26-2010, 10:39 PM | #11 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Not in Sunny Florida
Posts: 6,358
Drives: 16 Nismo w/Tech Pack
Rep Power: 4500 |
Quote:
As far as the Lotus I have no comment since I don't know about the car other that is like a go-kart.
__________________
2009 370Z MB Base w/Sport Package 6MT Modshack's Custom Air Intakes /3M Clear Bra/ Illuminated Kick Plates / F. I CBE w/12" resonators / EVO-R Front Lip / Rear Hatch Wing / Tein S-Tech Springs /Ilegal Tint in the Rep. of VA/4x20mm Z1 Spacers/ Vinyl Roof/Liquid Carbon Designs |
|
09-26-2010, 10:41 PM | #12 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 112
Drives: 03 G35 black 5AT
Rep Power: 16 |
Well you have to remember they're mid engine so they have less drivetrain loss.. Plus we all know Nissan (sadly) over rates their HP ratings.. Plus the NSX is lighter.. You just never know though.
NSX does handle better. |
09-26-2010, 10:49 PM | #13 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Not in Sunny Florida
Posts: 6,358
Drives: 16 Nismo w/Tech Pack
Rep Power: 4500 |
Quote:
But look at the specs for a supposed "super car": 252 HP SAE @ 6,600 rpm; 210 ft lb Weight lb: 3152
__________________
2009 370Z MB Base w/Sport Package 6MT Modshack's Custom Air Intakes /3M Clear Bra/ Illuminated Kick Plates / F. I CBE w/12" resonators / EVO-R Front Lip / Rear Hatch Wing / Tein S-Tech Springs /Ilegal Tint in the Rep. of VA/4x20mm Z1 Spacers/ Vinyl Roof/Liquid Carbon Designs Last edited by PapoZalsa; 09-26-2010 at 10:53 PM. |
|
09-26-2010, 11:36 PM | #14 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 160
Drives: Nissan
Rep Power: 16 |
Haha no.
If anything they underrate them. The US SAE closely regulates what manufacturers advertise for power figures, more often then not they are underrated. Never seen a Nissan that was overrated in power from the factory. |
09-26-2010, 11:39 PM | #15 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 160
Drives: Nissan
Rep Power: 16 |
Not really. The 300ZX TT, Supra TT, RX7 TT, VR4, etc. are all competitive with the 370Z in terms of performance, but they all were priced significantly higher as well. Those cars would be well into high 60 low 70Ks if sold today. And FWIW a properly driven 370Z > NSX.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nismo Z Suspension: All Nismo 370Z Owners Check Here FIRST! | G Fo12ce | Nismo 370Z | 271 | 10-02-2019 11:22 AM |
OEM 19" NISMO wheels by RAYSŪ (From 370Z Nismo) | Imperial | Parts for sale (Private Classifieds) | 8 | 09-26-2010 03:01 AM |
OEM 19" NISMO wheels by RAYSŪ (From 370Z Nismo) | Imperial | Parts for sale (Private Classifieds) | 49 | 09-20-2010 09:13 PM |
LTB: Stock Nismo Exhaust off a Nismo whos upgrading | chuckd05 | Parts for sale (Private Classifieds) | 5 | 12-03-2009 09:53 PM |
Base (w/Nismo Parts - Non Nismo Z) vs Sport Package | kraphy | Engine & Drivetrain | 10 | 09-24-2009 01:15 PM |