![]() |
Originally Posted by osbornsm I KNOW i was looking at that lens and considering it until i saw the $1100 price tag on it *cough. If you'd like to see
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
Track Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 597
Drives: like a maniac!
Rep Power: 17 ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
'11 SR/6MT/T/S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Yorktown, VA
Posts: 173
Drives: 12 370Z GM 7ATS NavS
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
1) You will get a bit sharper images from the better sensor IF your technique is good--otherwise won't make a noticeable difference for the type of shots you have posted.
2) The major advantages of a wider aperture lens are a) Shooting in dimmer light. b) Ability to throw backgrounds more out of focus. 3) There are techniques in Photoshop (and even Photoshop Elements), with or without extra plug-ins from non-Adobecompanies, that let you quite satisfactorily mimic selective focus. 4) Adding--and using!--a tripod will make more difference to your sharpness than a new camera body. Watch the pros shoot. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Car Sex (discussion) | Dragster | Gentleman's Club | 149 | 11-27-2018 10:59 PM |
| Plug and Play Bypass Kit (DVD, NAV and backup Camera) Discussion | bdl99 | Audio & Video | 362 | 04-11-2015 05:08 PM |
| R2C intake discussion ... | Methodical4u | Intake/Exhaust | 14 | 10-09-2011 10:55 PM |
| Peak Power discussion... | klubbheads | Engine & Drivetrain | 4 | 02-19-2009 08:52 PM |