Nissan 370Z Forum
Page 54 of 66 « First 4445253 54 555664 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Photography (http://www.the370z.com/photography/)
-   -   **Photography Chat** Version 1.0 (http://www.the370z.com/photography/26190-photography-chat-version-1-0-a.html)

Cmike2780 04-30-2012 06:37 PM
I agree with Parker. The 18-105 is an excellent lens. Its a bit more, but I really love my 16-85mm. I only wish it were faster @85mm. I take mostly indoor shots so the wider angle works more in my favor. 50mm is by far my favorite to shoot with.

Alchemy 04-30-2012 07:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkerman (Post 1695058)
Took some pictures of a friends 1963 Beetle last week.

http://www.parkerphotog.com/Automoti...DSC5867-XL.jpg

If you want to check out all the pictures you can go here if you'd like.

TJ's Beetle - Parker Photography - Tony Parker
Yeah man, AWESOME shot:tup:

HKYStormFront 05-04-2012 03:44 PM
reshot the Ariel Atom now that the build is done yesterday evening. here's a teaser...

http://jpmcgphotography.smugmug.com/...IMG1009-XL.jpg

200mm f/2.8 L on 5D2

Alchemy 05-04-2012 03:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HKYStormFront (Post 1704166)
reshot the Ariel Atom now that the build is done yesterday evening. here's a teaser...

http://jpmcgphotography.smugmug.com/...IMG1009-XL.jpg

200mm f/2.8 L on 5D2
:yum: one of my favorite cars on the planet!!

HKYStormFront 05-04-2012 03:52 PM
this one now has 600whp+ from a twin charged setup :driving:

Nitex 05-05-2012 12:45 AM
Love the shot of the Atom.. such a sick car!

One thing that I find odd. Is how sharp and clean the subject looks. But the background seems quite noisy?

HKYStormFront 05-05-2012 05:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitex (Post 1704984)
Love the shot of the Atom.. such a sick car!

One thing that I find odd. Is how sharp and clean the subject looks. But the background seems quite noisy?
think that was at 800 ISO so that may be the "noise" you are seeing. i don't really see any though. are you referring to the bokeh (aka the out of focus area) behind it? if so, that's a product of the lens and the f-stop

Nitex 05-05-2012 02:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HKYStormFront (Post 1705087)
think that was at 800 ISO so that may be the "noise" you are seeing. i don't really see any though. are you referring to the bokeh (aka the out of focus area) behind it? if so, that's a product of the lens and the f-stop
Im no pro thats for sure. It was just a curious observation. It could be "bokeh" that im seeing :tup:

Curious anyone in for a D800 vs 5d iii pros/cons debate? Anyone upgrading?

I sold my D7000 awhile back in lieu of a D700s that i inherited. Even though the D7000 was the better camera.. I guess i kept the D700s because it was my grandfathers :icon17:

Now im looking for a FF body to upgrade to and im thinking of bailing ship on nikon for canon L glass. That D800 sure does take great shots at low ISO.

onzedge 05-05-2012 02:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HKYStormFront (Post 1547165)
some new goodies arrived today!

http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-...67031673_n.jpg

bought the 135 f/2 and 200 f/2.8 and rented the 300 f/4 :woot: can't wait to use them this weekend, MOAR porsche pics inbound! :tup:
Nice assortment. :tup:

HKYStormFront 05-05-2012 09:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by onzedge (Post 1705495)
Nice assortment. :tup:
i plan to buy the 300mm f/4 IS asap... that lens was epic :excited:

Parkerman 05-05-2012 11:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitex (Post 1705493)
Im no pro thats for sure. It was just a curious observation. It could be "bokeh" that im seeing :tup:

Curious anyone in for a D800 vs 5d iii pros/cons debate? Anyone upgrading?

I sold my D7000 awhile back in lieu of a D700s that i inherited. Even though the D7000 was the better camera.. I guess i kept the D700s because it was my grandfathers :icon17:

Now im looking for a FF body to upgrade to and im thinking of bailing ship on nikon for canon L glass. That D800 sure does take great shots at low ISO.

What are you referring to as the D700s?

Because if you are saying the D7000 is better than the Nikon D700... Well then, I honestly don't follow... lol.

370zproject 05-05-2012 11:29 PM
1 Attachment(s)
best mine can do at night :/Attachment 46190

HKYStormFront 05-06-2012 06:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkerman (Post 1706015)
What are you referring to as the D700s?

Because if you are saying the D7000 is better than the Nikon D700... Well then, I honestly don't follow... lol.
yea i was like :wtf: lol

Nitex 05-06-2012 10:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parkerman (Post 1706015)
What are you referring to as the D700s?

Because if you are saying the D7000 is better than the Nikon D700... Well then, I honestly don't follow... lol.
So sorry guys i ment D300s!

Even so im sure some could justify the D300 as being better for thier use because of the more pro body construction. But if you compare stats the D7000 seems to come out ahead in all but AF cross points and full magnesium body.

Alchemy 05-06-2012 07:17 PM
a shot I grabbed of a friends daughter yesterday.

http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l2...yan/keira1.jpg


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:18 PM.
Page 54 of 66 « First 4445253 54 555664 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2