![]() |
Yeha, I guess new Miata's are better. The only Miata I drove was an older one (early 2000s or late 90s), and it was weak. My Pontiac Grand Am felt
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 237
Drives: 370z 40th 6MT
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Yeha, I guess new Miata's are better. The only Miata I drove was an older one (early 2000s or late 90s), and it was weak. My Pontiac Grand Am felt better when accelerating. Driving a new Miata would probably increase my opinion on that car, but meh
![]() I find it hard to believe that new 5.0 handle as well as Z, but even if they did, I'd still get a Z. Mostly because I believe that Z is built better than the Mustang, the Mustangs are very common, and the Z in my opinion looks better than the Mustang inside and outside. Now, I would probably choose a Boss or GT500 over Z But hey, lets not get too derailed? I think we just have different opinions and beliefs, and although mine is different than yours, I still understand and respect yours.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The Ark
Posts: 2,357
Drives: '09 370z
Rep Power: 23 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 30,879
Drives: 370z
Rep Power: 4212 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Saw my first one today, it looked good for a moment and then it feel off quickly.
The car has great potential to look fantastic with aftermarket but from factory Toyota dialed it down a bit much, should have pushed it a bit like concept II.
__________________
theDreamer's Z // Fast Intentions // Uprev // GTM // HKS // TEIN theDreamer's Silvia // URAS // GREDDY Houston Zs // Facebook // Twitter // Instagram |
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: May 2010
Location: nirvana
Posts: 6,394
Drives: 2023 NATM
Rep Power: 420 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I desperately want them to make a version with OEM boost and compete seriously with the Z.
That would be my next car (unless the next Z is even better...)
__________________
Enjoy it. Destroy it. |
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | ||
|
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Minot ND
Posts: 51,960
Drives: every day...
Rep Power: 215 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Quote:
![]() 黒子 ('Kuroko') Project: SuperNova Owner/Operator and Lead designer @BlackGuard Aeroworks |
||
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 120
Drives: 08MS3-BM-6MT
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
Quote:
The point I've been making is that it's ridiculous to ASSUME one way or the other that the BRZ / FR-S are somehow "over priced" and or "under powered" based one what is known. If most reviews said the BRZ / FR-S were a POS / Too slow, etc there might be a bases for that sort of opinion. However, seeing as this is NOT the case there's no bases to ASSUME the car is somehow not worth the price. It's dumb enough to judge a car having never driven it but to dis it when the reviews have been so overwhelmingly positive it makes absolutely no sense. It's pretty simple stuff. When a car "s" and deemed to be phenomenal by most accounts it just doesn't make much sense to conclude (without driving nonetheless) that the car "s" will somehow / someway not be worth it / over priced, etc. --- I am here: http://tapatalk.com/map.php?s4nu3o Last edited by vo2max99; 06-01-2012 at 01:03 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |||||
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The Ark
Posts: 2,357
Drives: '09 370z
Rep Power: 23 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
You assume I am missing your point. I am not. You said it very plainly here: Quote:
My point, that you CHOOSING TO IGNORE is: Accept it and move on instead rehashing your same point and throwing in inflamatory language to make yourself feel better and choosing certain phrasing to make yourself feel superior like all of this: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
[EDIT]Also, I am washing my hands of this conversation. If you cannot figure it out now, I can at least stop wasting my time.
__________________
Last edited by Spikuh; 06-01-2012 at 09:45 AM. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 120
Drives: 08MS3-BM-6MT
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
Motor Trend track tested:
Scion FR-S Subaru BRZ Ford Mustang Hyundai Gen Coupe Mazda MX-5 Miata VW GTI Summary: 1st place: Subaru BRZ - Offers Miata levels of driving enjoyment, with the practically and livability of a car with a roof, four seats, and truck. So it wins because they deemed it the best overall package in addition to being almost as fun as the MX-5. 2nd place: Scion FR-S - Basically the same as the BRZ but not quite the bargain considering interior /features.. Oh and it's a little more prone to oversteer /less controllable . 3rd place: Mazda MX-5 Miata- The most fun to drive car of the group. Pro driver "Randy Pobst" stated: "There's a reason 80 MX-5 Miatas are on the Pre-Grid at Road America, and it's the same reason this is the only car in which I did an extra lab simply 'cause I didn't wanna stop". 4th place: Ford Mustang - Pobst sums up the Mustang this way: "In terms of this group of cars, the Mustang is fast and numb"." Against the likes of BRZ, FR-S and Miata, it feels less engaging and, ultimately fat". 5th place: VW GTI - Drivers who require that a car have more than a tinge of practically need look no farther. But when performance is paramount, they'd be well advised to keep looking. 6th place: Hyundai Gen Coupe 2.0T R-Spec - Randy Pobst "Good mid-range torque, but feels distant and rubberized, detracting from on-track gratification". They complained about the crappy 6MT, steering feel / feedback and a few other things as well. It put down pretty good #'s though if that matters. These cars are all 30K and under but I don't think there's a new car up to 40K that would knock off the top 3 here besides maybe the EVO and it would be close in terms of being a superior driver's car. As far as straight line acceleration the BRZ / FR-S / MX-5 posted nearly identical 0-60 and 1/4 mile times: MX-5- 6.3 / 14.9; BRZ- 6.4 / 14.9 / FR-S-6.2 / 14.8. The Mustang was the fastest car of the group posting: 5.3 / 13.9 followed by the Gen Coupe's 5.7 / 14.2 and GTI's (6-speed twin-cl auto) 6.1 / 14.7 Just another great example showing how test track #'s don't even begin to scratch the surface when evaluating the value of a sports car. --- I am here: http://tapatalk.com/map.php?wqnxoo Last edited by vo2max99; 06-01-2012 at 01:01 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: MD
Posts: 40,963
Drives: HypeTrain Choo Choo!
Rep Power: 143 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You also can't assume the FRS/BRZ is a great driver's car without actually driving it first. Just because MT put it in 1st place on some comparison test doesn't give it more value as a sports car.
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: window seat
Posts: 28,940
Drives: Mostly on two wheels
Rep Power: 122 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
:| |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bazooka Powered Subs...anyone??? | john370z | Audio & Video | 8 | 08-16-2009 11:25 PM |
| 2009 Subaru Impreza WRX STI Design Concept by Lars Martensson | BanningZ | Other Vehicles | 7 | 05-28-2009 11:02 PM |
| I'm a subaru guy who fell in love with a Z | omnomz | New 370Z Owner | 7 | 05-02-2009 02:59 PM |
| High-Powered Vehicle | Indy | Australia/New Zealand | 1 | 04-15-2009 09:51 PM |
| 2009 Subaru Impreza WRX STI - Pearl White - Immaculate! | kailua | Other Vehicle For sale | 9 | 03-04-2009 12:29 AM |