apparently it looks good enough to convince my wife to fb me and basically tell me I can pick one up for my new DD..

Lol

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

I don't consider that a flattering picture at all. In fact, it does look like a G37 coupe. The exact model that I really think looks ugly as heck... :(

Good call, that way you have two cars you can't drive through the winter:icon17:

hey now, people drive their stangs here all winter... :bowrofl::bowrofl::bowrofl:

Agree. The angle of that picture definitely makes the front look like the curent G. The rear is odd. It's like they were creating a "flowy" design but then said wait, let's stick the traditional Mustang tails on there. I do like they went lighter, but I don't like how they tried to look more "import". American sports cars are big, chunky cars with huge engines. The gigantic front end seem like they were trying to adhere to this somewhat.

Dan, I can always mount a snow plow on the front! lol

True! The current gen GT has better ground clearance than the Z so I don't see why it'd be an issue. :D

weight distribution is a challenge on ice, and ground clearance is an issue in places that get real snow.


http://www.the370z.com/attachment.ph...1&d=1386276791

Winter tires and ~150 lbs in the trunk with get you partway, but past about 6 inches of accumulation you start ripping parts off the car.

i saw the new vert today on cnn. it actually looked pretty good since the weird roof line was missing. :icon17:

You had me at six inches.

Im no stranger to snow, The Mustang would do just fine in Chicago. Plows are very good in the city and burbs. I could probably drive the Z year round but I hate the salt

like I said, I can install a plow :P

Roads are very different for mr. Mu in Minot. You can drive anything in Chicago.

lol

Seriously though, it's a sports/muscle car. That's like saying it's terrible off road too.