![]() |
This car is badass, you need to hear it in person before rushing to judgment. It is on a completely different level than the 370z, it's not even close in
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 9,262
Drives: Z33 & GE8
Rep Power: 461 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This car is badass, you need to hear it in person before rushing to judgment.
It is on a completely different level than the 370z, it's not even close in terms of refinement, luxury, or brand recognition so it's not even a fair comparison |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Track Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 846
Drives: 991.2 GT3
Rep Power: 19 ![]() ![]() |
I'd take the Jag over the 911. I don't think I could ever by a base 911 or 911 S, I'd have to go GT3/GT2.
That Jag is gorgeous! Their design team is incredible.
__________________
350z / 40th 370z / C6 Z06 / BMW M4 / V10 R8 / C7 Grand Spot / 997.1 GT3 / S2K / Camaro ZL1 / 718 GTS / 991.2 GT3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Track Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NM / CA
Posts: 981
Drives: '13 911 C2S
Rep Power: 17 ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I like the built in diffuser on the V8 version. And the orange color is just amazing!
__________________
| EVO X MR | '11 WRX STI | 370Z SPRT | 911 (991) C2S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 12,265
Drives: 2011 370ztt
Rep Power: 29540 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Same here. My shame would fade, but I'd still have the GT2.
__________________
2011 MB Touring-Sport-6sp-Nav/GTM TT/FI TT TDX/JTran/Kosmic/Eibach/Hotchkis/SPC/CSF/RPS/SoThatsWhereAllMyMoneyWent |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Enthusiast Member
![]() Join Date: May 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 362
Drives: MB Roadster (sold)
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Quote:
1. SC v6 has a far broader torque band then the NA Z: the engine is a beast 2. Classic Jag styling, subjective but its a looker. 3. Much better interior and customization available 4. Target market: Cayman/Boxster or low end 911 Copy cats...that's pun-ny Most folks copy Jag styling given they are classics. The Z will remain a sports car and is a fantastic package for what it is.The F type is a bit porky IMHO, so to me its leans more GT then Sports car when comparing it to a Boxster. Kudos for Jaguar for bringing this sucker to market. With the exception of the transmission choices, I could see myself actually lusting after one for once. - b |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Enthusiast Member
![]() Join Date: May 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 362
Drives: MB Roadster (sold)
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Quote:
![]() The price points are so vastly different that I am not faulting Nissan: they brought a very specific car to market segment devoid of competition, though not a large market segment. The F and the P cars are priced similarly (though I would expect the Jag to come out 10-15% less expensive, in the ball park) - b |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Enthusiast Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Cerritos, CA
Posts: 482
Drives: 2010 40th
Rep Power: 15 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Enthusiast Member
![]() Join Date: May 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 362
Drives: MB Roadster (sold)
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Right...and if they used say a Cayman S as a benchmark the missed.
A base car will be at a pretty big HP disadvantage but I would bet a good steak that most people after driving both cars for a week would take the underpowered car as it provides a better driving experience. The Z is: 1. Porkier then Kardashian calves 2. Lacks steering feel (its good, not great) 3. Ridiculously sensitive on/off TCS for a sports car You are not going to get around the fact that a big honking 6 is hanging over the front axle vs a mid-engine car: tough to fight the physics there. I seem to be in the minority on this site, but I wanted the Z to be a return to its roots, lighter, fun to toss, and absolute power not a requirement as its a street car. Heck I had hoped the Z33 was a NA I-6, 250 HP, 3000 lbs. Boy was I waaay of base on that. If you are going to charge 35-45K for it, then it should have better interior for its class. Missed that too. Perhaps its hard for Nissan to do with the amount of platform sharing that may be mandated by corporate management. Driving the Z, I feel like it is a good GT car that wants to be a sports car. Driving the 987, I feel like I am driving a sports car that just wants to be pushed harder. - b |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 1,059
Drives: 370Z Racecar
Rep Power: 21 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
With a few simple mods 370z is just as fast if not faster than a a cayman S on track. In my opinion I enjoy way 370 handles better than a Cayman. My Nismo is stockish form ate up Cayman S on track. Now it blows them away. My 370z is closer to GT3 performance now at less than a 1/3 rd the cost. And cayman s even out of box requires some mods to make them decent track car so youre going to spend money over base price to get the car to work properly on track. I'd much rather spend mod money on a $30k car than on $70k car.
__________________
Grant Last edited by Shamu; 07-21-2013 at 04:37 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Gold Coast CT
Posts: 10,599
Drives: 2019 Corvette G.S.
Rep Power: 44 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
SOLD MY Z MARCH 2018 - another Core OG moves on - new ride 2019 Z Corvette Grand Sport - no mods necessary but already have eyes on HFC and intakes LOL IT NEVER ENDS. Last edited by 370Zsteve; 07-19-2013 at 06:55 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Sacratomato
Posts: 309
Drives: your mama wild.
Rep Power: 15 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I checked it out last night after I saw an ad on the golf channel. It's a beautiful car. The engineering, as far as the transmission knowing when to downshift in a curve, looks really cool. Too much $$ for me. If I had the cash I'd definitely be taking a look. It's not always about horsepower. They do have a V8 with over 400hp. That's more than enough for just about anyone. Even with the 4000 lb.+ weight.
Last edited by 10MPlayer; 07-19-2013 at 08:19 PM. Reason: cleaning up |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,430
Drives: N/A
Rep Power: 16 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If you think a Jag F-Type looks anything like a 370Z, you're delusional.
__________________
2012 PW NISMO #0559 - GT Spec Brace Kit - Swift Springs - ARK TP & Invidia CBE K&N Intake - UpRev Tune - 15mm Z1 Spacers & Studs - StopTech Slotted Rotors & SS Lines - ZSpeed CMAK with Stage 2 Clutch and Lightweight Flywheel |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: .
Posts: 42,608
Drives: .
Rep Power: 3888 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I am disappointed by the size of the f. When I heard ramblings that this was going into production, I'd hoped it would be smaller, a proper brit roadster. I parked next to one a few weeks ago, and it dwarfed my Corvette. It is massive.
I also have a personal bias against jags because they don't offer a manual option and are very expensive, but their design is beautiful |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2014 Chevrolet Camaro LS7, Twin-Turbo V-6 Revealed In 2014 GM Document | 96bigbody | Other Vehicles | 2 | 12-21-2012 07:47 PM |
| Jaguar C-X16 | toxik | Other Vehicles | 22 | 03-16-2012 10:38 PM |
| Jaguar C-X75 Range Extended Electric Supercar | Jeffblue | Other Vehicles | 2 | 09-30-2010 01:15 PM |
| Jaguar SFR Bonneville 225.675 MPH | AK370Z | Other Vehicles | 7 | 01-25-2009 02:21 AM |