Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Other Vehicles (http://www.the370z.com/other-vehicles/)
-   -   FT-86 vs 370z time to trade in? (http://www.the370z.com/other-vehicles/35312-ft-86-vs-370z-time-trade.html)

m4a1mustang 02-03-2012 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 370Zsteve (Post 1523861)
1995 RX-7 loaded - MSRP was $35,300

1995 TT Supra with ALL options - MSRP was $49,900.00

And people made a helluva lot more money in '95 than they do now. Where do you people get this schitt? :shakes head:

:icon17:

vo2max99 06-03-2012 10:22 AM

Overwhelming Evidence (reviews by others) to date suggest the BRZ / FR-S are NOT under-powered / over-priced hence it doesn't make much sense to assume otherwise.

I've stated I wouldn't know one why or another until I got to drive one. However, based on what is known there is no good reason to assume the BRZ / FR-S will somehow be over-priced / under-powered.

When so many who've driven the cars have given them such overwhelming high praise suggesting the cars will somehow be sub par doesn't make any sense.

Now if you've actually driven the car and deemed the car somehow sub par that would be an opinion that actually made sense for you. You would then have a legitimate bases to form a negative opinion.

Not sure how much more clear I can make this...






---
I am here: http://tapatalk.com/map.php?p4i1eq

m4a1mustang 06-03-2012 10:34 AM

I saw a BRZ in the wild last night. Looks very nice!

KaienZ34 06-03-2012 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m4a1mustang (Post 1751750)
I saw a BRZ in the wild last night, killed and ate it, it was VERY tasty!


:yum: You didn't save me any?? :shakes head:

AlphaSnacks 06-03-2012 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vo2max99 (Post 1751740)
Overwhelming Evidence (reviews by others) to date suggest the BRZ / FR-S are NOT under-powered / over-priced hence it doesn't make much sense to assume otherwise.

Actually, overwhelming evidence shows, to me, that this car IS underpowered. That evidence being a 0-120MPH run that takes 28 seconds to achieve.

0-200 km/h : Subaru BRZ (Motorsport) - YouTube

Mer personally, I simply can't justify the cost for that kind of performance.

Compdoc777 06-03-2012 10:54 AM

I am in when the add a turbo to 2.0

m4a1mustang 06-03-2012 11:10 AM

I wouldn't pay 28k for one, but for 15-18k I'd buy a used one to DD if I liked how it drove.

I love driving my s2000 even though its painfully slow. So its not all about power, but it is nice to have the 5.0 and clk500 when I need HP/torque.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Jordo! 06-03-2012 01:34 PM

Every review boils down to: Handles and brakes great; needs more torque.

They're testing a twincharged version making 320 bhp. If THAT (or something very close to that) becomes available I'll get that next.

Otherwise, next car will be another Z.

AlphaSnacks 06-03-2012 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m4a1mustang (Post 1751789)
I wouldn't pay 28k for one, but for 15-18k I'd buy a used one to DD if I liked how it drove.

I love driving my s2000 even though its painfully slow. So its not all about power, but it is nice to have the 5.0 and clk500 when I need HP/torque.

S2000 is considerably faster than the BRZ/86.

Drex 06-03-2012 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vo2max99 (Post 1751740)
Overwhelming Evidence (reviews by others) to date suggest the BRZ / FR-S are NOT under-powered / over-priced hence it doesn't make much sense to assume otherwise.

I've stated I wouldn't know one why or another until I got to drive one. However, based on what is known there is no good reason to assume the BRZ / FR-S will somehow be over-priced / under-powered.

When so many who've driven the cars have given them such overwhelming high praise suggesting the cars will somehow be sub par doesn't make any sense.

Now if you've actually driven the car and deemed the car somehow sub par that would be an opinion that actually made sense for you. You would then have a legitimate bases to form a negative opinion.

Not sure how much more clear I can make this...

the other thread was locked, so you find this one to repost the same thing again? we all get it by now. you love the brz/frs because magazines say its good.

this is getting to the level of spam now. :ugh2:

Iceagetlc 06-03-2012 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vo2max99 (Post 1751740)
Overwhelming Evidence (reviews by others) to date suggest the BRZ / FR-S are NOT under-powered / over-priced hence it doesn't make much sense to assume otherwise.

I've stated I wouldn't know one why or another until I got to drive one. However, based on what is known there is no good reason to assume the BRZ / FR-S will somehow be over-priced / under-powered.

When so many who've driven the cars have given them such overwhelming high praise suggesting the cars will somehow be sub par doesn't make any sense.

Now if you've actually driven the car and deemed the car somehow sub par that would be an opinion that actually made sense for you. You would then have a legitimate bases to form a negative opinion.

Not sure how much more clear I can make this...






---
I am here: http://tapatalk.com/map.php?p4i1eq

Enjoy your BRZ. :ugh2:

Jordo! 06-03-2012 03:36 PM

Performance-wise, it's basically a hard top MX5. That will be a great little car, but it really can't touch the Z -- a point recently confirmed in a vid of an autox shootout, BTW.

I'm really hoping they offer a factory boosted version -- that would be a Z killer and have tons of potential!

In current form it really only trumps the Z in specific driver-oriented qualia (e.g., feeling of "connectedness"). Otherwise it's just a lesser car all the way around.

High hopes for a FI variant, tho'.

DJ-of-E 06-04-2012 02:35 AM

Can we close this thread, too? =P

Anyways.

Quote:

Nissan is the only manufacturer that has the balls to keep a proper sports car on the street in the face of the Senate designing cars and Hybrid fever stupidity spreading.
:stirthepot:

theDreamer 06-04-2012 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m4a1mustang (Post 1751789)
I wouldn't pay 28k for one, but for 15-18k I'd buy a used one to DD if I liked how it drove.

I love driving my s2000 even though its painfully slow. So its not all about power, but it is nice to have the 5.0 and clk500 when I need HP/torque.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

I agree, for 20k new (less for used) I would pick one up for a DD.
It would be fun, cheap and a good car to get from A to B.

b1adesofcha0s 06-04-2012 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theDreamer (Post 1753280)
I agree, for 20k new (less for used) I would pick one up for a DD.
It would be fun, cheap and a good car to get from A to B.

+1


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2