![]() |
Quote:
http://www.newsrescue.com/wp-content...on_hounsou.jpg |
Quote:
Mustang 2004 versus Mustang 2005. Now that is a redesign.. Mustang 1998 versus Mustang 1999. Face lift. The 4th gen F-bodies went through a slow evolution over their run, but nothing more. Even your pictures that you post has the 2nd looking like the first with a body kit. |
Quote:
http://carphotos.cardomain.com/ride_...0040_large.jpg |
I still think Trans Ams look awesome in that "oh my God it's so ugly it looks awesome" kind of way. :D
|
Quote:
|
That Bra, is like the a car cover for the Z?
Its Big and Bloated. |
An engine and body work doesn't really constitute a redesign, though.
To me, a redesign = new chassis. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Plus, a lot of cars share the same base platforms but much of the chassis is still exclusive to that particular model. You can't just take a Charger and slap a Challenger body on it. Though I am sure you know that. ;) |
Quote:
Just a friendly argument, but it seems hard for me to buy into: - A redesign constitutes a changed chassis - But a new car can use an old chassis, and that's cool. In fact, by what you're saying, did the camaro/firebird ever get a redesign? Up until the latest version, they were all f-bodies. Edit: and as far as it not counting because it's not the same model, the firebird and camaro were different models, but talk about only a couple minor differences. You couldn't even tell what car you were in from the inside. |
Quote:
|
And it will still be a Government Motors car...
I was waffling between an 08 Vett Z06, 09 BMW Z4 3.5i, and the 370Z coupe before I got my 370Z roadster. I could not get over the cheesy GM interior on the Vett. I mean come on, it is a 70K car and they put a window switch in for the Ignition button :shakes head: I just could not get past the price on the Z4 3.5i especially since it barely out performed the Z Roadster in a strait line(stock, and I hear the easy mods on the Z4 get an easy 80HP without trying hard), and does not outperform it in the twisties. Unfortunately for me my wife made me go test drive the 370 with her along. The Roadster seats were the deal sealer, she loved them from the first minute. The Touring coupe seats made her completely uncomfortable, and I was not a fan of them either. The bonus of having a convertible again was the final deal sealer. As I sit here in Jordan she is out driving my car...:owned: |
Quote:
94:123,198/ 119,934 95: 185,986/ 122,844 96: 126,483/ 66,827 97: 100,254/ 95,812 98: 170,642/ 77,198 99: 126,067/ 42,098 00: 218,525/ 45,417 01: 155,162/ 29,009 Mustang never had a power advantage, so why did it outsell the Camaro so badly? Why did GM use the "excuse" of everyone moving to 4 and 6 cyl cars as a reason they cut off production in 2002 yet the Mustang continue to sell well? My opinion is styling and the lack of a meaningful refresh in almost 10 years was the #1 reason followed by strategic shifts in the next gen chassis to build a new Camaro from. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:44 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2