Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Other Vehicles (http://www.the370z.com/other-vehicles/)
-   -   2012 Camaro Z28 (http://www.the370z.com/other-vehicles/22510-2012-camaro-z28.html)

Red370 07-24-2010 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frost (Post 642631)
Didn't redesign the car for 10 years?

http://home.grandecom.net/~chughes/ag/pics/ss97ta1.jpg
97 trans am

http://carphotos.cardomain.com/ride_...0001_large.jpg
98 trans am

Oh, and let's not forget the completely different engine, going from iron to aluminum. Your argument is dumb and invalid.

god that car looked awful, thing has nostrils like Djimon Hounsou.

http://www.newsrescue.com/wp-content...on_hounsou.jpg

MMC Racing 07-24-2010 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frost (Post 642631)
Your argument is dumb and invalid.

Maybe you don't understand the difference between minor face lifts and a redesign.. :confused:

Mustang 2004 versus Mustang 2005. Now that is a redesign..

Mustang 1998 versus Mustang 1999. Face lift.

The 4th gen F-bodies went through a slow evolution over their run, but nothing more. Even your pictures that you post has the 2nd looking like the first with a body kit.

frost 07-24-2010 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red370 (Post 642651)
god that car looked awful, thing has nostrils like Djimon Hounsou.

Maybe a firehawk is more your style? two less nostrils but same ram air

http://carphotos.cardomain.com/ride_...0040_large.jpg

m4a1mustang 07-24-2010 11:38 AM

I still think Trans Ams look awesome in that "oh my God it's so ugly it looks awesome" kind of way. :D

frost 07-24-2010 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MMC Racing (Post 642655)
Maybe you don't understand the difference between minor face lifts and a redesign.. :confused:

Mustang 2004 versus Mustang 2005. Now that is a redesign..

Mustang 1998 versus Mustang 1999. Face lift.

The 4th gen F-bodies went through a slow evolution over their run, but nothing more. Even your pictures that you post has the 2nd looking like the first with a body kit.

If you think the difference between those cars is a facelift, we just have completely different eyes. Not to mention (again) the completely different engine. Not like what happened in the middle of the 350z's run, I mean a huge change in engines. :ugh2:

Trips 07-24-2010 11:40 AM

That Bra, is like the a car cover for the Z?
Its Big and Bloated.

m4a1mustang 07-24-2010 11:40 AM

An engine and body work doesn't really constitute a redesign, though.

To me, a redesign = new chassis.

frost 07-24-2010 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m4a1mustang (Post 642675)
An engine and body work doesn't really constitute a redesign, though.

To me, a redesign = new chassis.

I can see this logic, BUT what does that mean for new cars, such as the challenger that ride on a chassis that was already in use in other cars for several years? Is the challenger just a charger/magnum/300 with a body kit?

m4a1mustang 07-24-2010 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frost (Post 642681)
I can see this logic, BUT what does that mean for new cars, such as the challenger that ride on a chassis that was already in use in other cars for several years? Is the challenger just a charger/magnum/300 with a body kit?

No, that logic doesn't work because it's a different model.

Plus, a lot of cars share the same base platforms but much of the chassis is still exclusive to that particular model. You can't just take a Charger and slap a Challenger body on it. Though I am sure you know that. ;)

frost 07-24-2010 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m4a1mustang (Post 642684)
No, that logic doesn't work because it's a different model.

Plus, a lot of cars share the same base platforms but much of the chassis is still exclusive to that particular model. You can't just take a Charger and slap a Challenger body on it. Though I am sure you know that. ;)

:gasp: You mean cars aren't like RC cars and I can't just hoist the shell off one and slap on another? How dare you.

Just a friendly argument, but it seems hard for me to buy into:
- A redesign constitutes a changed chassis
- But a new car can use an old chassis, and that's cool.

In fact, by what you're saying, did the camaro/firebird ever get a redesign? Up until the latest version, they were all f-bodies.

Edit: and as far as it not counting because it's not the same model, the firebird and camaro were different models, but talk about only a couple minor differences. You couldn't even tell what car you were in from the inside.

m4a1mustang 07-24-2010 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frost (Post 642686)
:gasp: You mean cars aren't like RC cars and I can't just hoist the shell off one and slap on another? How dare you.

Just a friendly argument, but it seems hard for me to buy into:
- A redesign constitutes a changed chassis
- But a new car can use an old chassis, and that's cool.

In fact, by what you're saying, did the camaro/firebird ever get a redesign? Up until the latest version, they were all f-bodies.

You're not following what I'm saying at all frost.

Kirkster 07-24-2010 12:01 PM

And it will still be a Government Motors car...

I was waffling between an 08 Vett Z06, 09 BMW Z4 3.5i, and the 370Z coupe before I got my 370Z roadster.

I could not get over the cheesy GM interior on the Vett. I mean come on, it is a 70K car and they put a window switch in for the Ignition button :shakes head:

I just could not get past the price on the Z4 3.5i especially since it barely out performed the Z Roadster in a strait line(stock, and I hear the easy mods on the Z4 get an easy 80HP without trying hard), and does not outperform it in the twisties.

Unfortunately for me my wife made me go test drive the 370 with her along. The Roadster seats were the deal sealer, she loved them from the first minute. The Touring coupe seats made her completely uncomfortable, and I was not a fan of them either. The bonus of having a convertible again was the final deal sealer.

As I sit here in Jordan she is out driving my car...:owned:

MMC Racing 07-24-2010 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frost (Post 642670)
If you think the difference between those cars is a facelift, we just have completely different eyes. Not to mention (again) the completely different engine. Not like what happened in the middle of the 350z's run, I mean a huge change in engines. :ugh2:

Lets look at some numbers.. Mustang/Camaro sales in the 4th gen timeframe:

94:123,198/ 119,934
95: 185,986/ 122,844
96: 126,483/ 66,827
97: 100,254/ 95,812
98: 170,642/ 77,198
99: 126,067/ 42,098
00: 218,525/ 45,417
01: 155,162/ 29,009

Mustang never had a power advantage, so why did it outsell the Camaro so badly? Why did GM use the "excuse" of everyone moving to 4 and 6 cyl cars as a reason they cut off production in 2002 yet the Mustang continue to sell well?

My opinion is styling and the lack of a meaningful refresh in almost 10 years was the #1 reason followed by strategic shifts in the next gen chassis to build a new Camaro from.

Lemers 07-24-2010 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frost (Post 642681)
I can see this logic, BUT what does that mean for new cars, such as the challenger that ride on a chassis that was already in use in other cars for several years? Is the challenger just a charger/magnum/300 with a body kit?

Yes! Yes it is Frost. And the G coupe is a Z

frost 07-24-2010 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m4a1mustang (Post 642687)
You're not following what I'm saying at all frost.

Can I follow but just not agree?

Quote:

Originally Posted by MMC Racing (Post 642689)
Lets look at some numbers.. Mustang/Camaro sales in the 4th gen timeframe:

94:123,198/ 119,934
95: 185,986/ 122,844
96: 126,483/ 66,827
97: 100,254/ 95,812
98: 170,642/ 77,198
99: 126,067/ 42,098
00: 218,525/ 45,417
01: 155,162/ 29,009

Mustang never had a power advantage, so why did it outsell the Camaro so badly? Why did GM use the "excuse" of everyone moving to 4 and 6 cyl cars as a reason they cut off production in 2002 yet the Mustang continue to sell well?

My opinion is styling and the lack of a meaningful refresh in almost 10 years was the #1 reason followed by strategic shifts in the next gen chassis to build a new Camaro from.

Are you actually saying the f-bod twins didn't have a refresh and the mustang did?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2