Considering: 2017 QX50 3.7/7A awd...

Ventruck · 05-18-2021, 10:58 PM

I rented the 2018 or 2019 model.

It did feel like an SUV as far as size goes, at least in dry conditions. Handling wasn't engaging imo, but not sloppy either. Pretty sure it only had the smaller VC engine (since, rental car). Still had more than enough pace on highway stretches where everyone was going over the top, and stable.

It was a bit of a head scratcher. I can't say it was bad, but me and the passengers for the 6+ hours of driving weren't sure about its worth at MSRP when the non-luxury Japanese brands were improving their interiors. Then again, I feel that way about some BMW's and Lexus models. It's not so much that they're bad, but it's like, are they really all that better for the money?

The used market may be the different situation, though. I imagine it starts looking like a more attractive prospect.

If say, you're trying to size it up against the CX-5, I think it's not on the same level in terms of driving experience, partially because of the transmission the Mazda has that makes it feel more "direct" as opposed to the power.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
2017 FSM help	ZoomZ	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	3	10-02-2018 08:43 PM
Boost Festival 2017: Feb 25, 2017 Willow Springs GTA, JustDrift, Drift	ModinJapan	Southern California Region	0	01-24-2017 03:45 PM
2017 370z Nismo Vs 2017 Q60 Red Sport	cwv	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	15	09-08-2016 11:06 PM
2017 rx-7?	slippery4678	Other Vehicles	12	11-13-2012 12:19 PM

05-18-2021, 10:58 PM	#3 (permalink)
Ventruck Track Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Location: California Posts: 785 Drives: '13 Sport+Touring M6 Rep Power: 22899	I rented the 2018 or 2019 model. It did feel like an SUV as far as size goes, at least in dry conditions. Handling wasn't engaging imo, but not sloppy either. Pretty sure it only had the smaller VC engine (since, rental car). Still had more than enough pace on highway stretches where everyone was going over the top, and stable. It was a bit of a head scratcher. I can't say it was bad, but me and the passengers for the 6+ hours of driving weren't sure about its worth at MSRP when the non-luxury Japanese brands were improving their interiors. Then again, I feel that way about some BMW's and Lexus models. It's not so much that they're bad, but it's like, are they really all that better for the money? The used market may be the different situation, though. I imagine it starts looking like a more attractive prospect. If say, you're trying to size it up against the CX-5, I think it's not on the same level in terms of driving experience, partially because of the transmission the Mazda has that makes it feel more "direct" as opposed to the power.