![]() |
Honestly speaking, the Vette is a better bet overall, for the prices you mentioned. It's got about 100 HP more, more torque, straight-line acceleration etc. But I don't know about
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Track Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: s. cali, los angeles
Posts: 627
Drives: 09 370z plat 6 speed
Rep Power: 268 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Honestly speaking, the Vette is a better bet overall, for the prices you mentioned. It's got about 100 HP more, more torque, straight-line acceleration etc. But I don't know about the handling part...and don't really care.
Here's the downside of the Vette, in my honest opinion: styling looks generic relative to 370, it's too simplistic and retains the fundamental silhouette of early 80's Vette-->bland styling: long nose, hatchback. It's not voluptuous as a 370. I'm sorry, but the C6 looks "cheapy" for a $50K+ car. It may be a good value, but ironically the poor "fit & finish" defeats that. The Vette is a step up from the Z-car. But it's not a fair comparison because Vettes are $50K+ cars, and Z's are $30K+ cars--a $20K disparity. I speak from experience, I used to work at Penske Chevrolet/Cadillac as a salesman and drove Vettes around on test drives. Very torquey b/c of the LS-1/6 motors. But if you can get a C6 Vette at that price, I reluctantly say it's the obvious choice. |
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Thoughts on 09 WRX? | blinkme323 | Other Vehicles | 14 | 08-27-2009 02:43 PM |
| Thoughts/Opinions Please | dainedazz | Exterior & Interior | 12 | 08-23-2009 10:21 AM |
| Thoughts on this wheel......on a 370Z?? | The_Zed_car | Wheels & Tires | 7 | 06-10-2009 11:15 AM |
| Your thoughts on the 370z and Follow the Z Tour? | MikeZ | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 25 | 01-23-2009 01:07 PM |
| Initial thoughts and pics of my new Z! | Pushing_Tin | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 47 | 01-16-2009 02:01 AM |