![]() |
Originally Posted by sloterg once ur married, depending on the spouse and what u guys agree with should be the ultimate choice, is what i think
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Grand Prix of Endurance
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3,476
Drives: Mulsanne Straight
Rep Power: 27 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Read!
Every state in the union has a law like this one! California Penal Code 273.5 273.5. (a) Any person who willfully inflicts upon a person who is his or her spouse, former spouse, cohabitant, former cohabitant, or the mother or father of his or her child, corporal injury resulting in a traumatic condition, is guilty of a felony, and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or four years, or in a county jail for not more than one year, or by a fine of up to six thousand dollars ($6,000) or by both that fine and imprisonment. (b) Holding oneself out to be the husband or wife of the person with whom one is cohabiting is not necessary to constitute cohabitation as the term is used in this section. (c) As used in this section, "traumatic condition" means a condition of the body, such as a wound or external or internal injury, whether of a minor or serious nature, caused by a physical force. (d) For the purpose of this section, a person shall be considered the father or mother of another person's child if the alleged male parent is presumed the natural father under Sections 7611 and 7612 of the Family Code. (e) (1) Any person convicted of violating this section for acts occurring within seven years of a previous conviction under subdivision (a), or subdivision (d) of Section 243, or Section 243.4, 244, 244.5, or 245, shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by imprisonment in the state prison for two, four, or five years, or by both imprisonment and a fine of up to ten thousand dollars ($10,000). (2) Any person convicted of a violation of this section for acts occurring within seven years of a previous conviction under subdivision (e) of Section 243 shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or four years, or in a county jail for not more than one year, or by a fine of up to ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or by both that imprisonment and fine. (f) If probation is granted to any person convicted under subdivision (a), the court shall impose probation consistent with the provisions of Section 1203.097. (g) If probation is granted, or the execution or imposition of a sentence is suspended, for any defendant convicted under subdivision (a) who has been convicted of any prior offense specified in subdivision (e), the court shall impose one of the following conditions of probation: (1) If the defendant has suffered one prior conviction within the previous seven years for a violation of any offense specified in subdivision (e), it shall be a condition thereof, in addition to the provisions contained in Section 1203.097, that he or she be imprisoned in a county jail for not less than 15 days. (2) If the defendant has suffered two or more prior convictions within the previous seven years for a violation of any offense specified in subdivision (e), it shall be a condition of probation, in addition to the provisions contained in Section 1203.097, that he or she be imprisoned in a county jail for not less than 60 days. (3) The court, upon a showing of good cause, may find that the mandatory imprisonment required by this subdivision shall not be imposed and shall state on the record its reasons for finding good cause. (h) If probation is granted upon conviction of a violation of subdivision (a), the conditions of probation may include, consistent with the terms of probation imposed pursuant to Section 1203.097, in lieu of a fine, one or both of the following requirements: (1) That the defendant make payments to a battered women's shelter, up to a maximum of five thousand dollars ($5,000), pursuant to Section 1203.097. (2) That the defendant reimburse the victim for reasonable costs of counseling and other reasonable expenses that the court finds are the direct result of the defendant's offense. For any order to pay a fine, make payments to a battered women's shelter, or pay restitution as a condition of probation under this subdivision, the court shall make a determination of the defendant's ability to pay. In no event shall any order to make payments to a battered women's shelter be made if it would impair the ability of the defendant to pay direct restitution to the victim or court-ordered child support. Where the injury to a married person is caused in whole or in part by the criminal acts of his or her spouse in violation of this section, the community property may not be used to discharge the liability of the offending spouse for restitution to the injured spouse, required by Section 1203.04, as operative on or before August 2, 1995, or Section 1202.4, or to a shelter for costs with regard to the injured spouse and dependents, required by this section, until all separate property of the offending spouse is exhausted. (i) Upon conviction under subdivision (a), the sentencing court shall also consider issuing an order restraining the defendant from any contact with the victim, which may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the court. It is the intent of the Legislature that the length of any restraining order be based upon the seriousness of the facts before the court, the probability of future violations, and the safety of the victim and his or her immediate family. This protective order may be issued by the court whether the defendant is sentenced to state prison, county jail, or if imposition of sentence is suspended and the defendant is placed on probation.
__________________
![]() We can do without any article of luxury we have never had; but once obtained, it is not in human nature to surrender it voluntary. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New Bern
Posts: 252
Drives: 9 370z SptCp SRd 7AT
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
omg people are way too sensitive. It was a joke anyone could tell that. Why do people have to crusade about every issue? Geezus I am so sick of the thin skinned attitudes that are so prevalent. Just let it go already. I guess people have it so easy in their lives that their only worry is about insensitive jokes being told on the internet. I'll tell you what why not donate some money to abused women and stop whining about what someone posted if you're so concerned about it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
I shake Caravans
![]() Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: north Dallas
Posts: 9,517
Drives: everyone crazy
Rep Power: 44 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
____________________ PROJECT DiaD - Sold but not forgotten! The first testicular guard, the "Cup," was used in Hockey in 1874 and the first helmet was used in 1974. That means it only took 100 years for men to realize that in order to work the penis, the brain must remain whole. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 438
Drives: Mazda mx5 2007 6sp m
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Quote:
Oh settle down. I think it would be great if sexy women beat up their partners! But that's me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
I shake Caravans
![]() Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: north Dallas
Posts: 9,517
Drives: everyone crazy
Rep Power: 44 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
very probably true...
__________________
____________________ PROJECT DiaD - Sold but not forgotten! The first testicular guard, the "Cup," was used in Hockey in 1874 and the first helmet was used in 1974. That means it only took 100 years for men to realize that in order to work the penis, the brain must remain whole. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Track Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Francisco
Age: 58
Posts: 551
Drives: 06 350 ZR CS
Rep Power: 301 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This thread really needs a diversion. Apologies to our female members (dont have any dude pics
)Be aware it really is a big picture...
__________________
Chef Greg At Your Service
Last edited by Greg; 09-16-2009 at 04:29 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 416
Drives: GP Z Base+Sport (6m)
Rep Power: 543 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
pointless conversation.
__________________
![]() "Burnley Football Club supporter" ENGLAND...ENGLAND...ENGLAND |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Track Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: california 707!
Posts: 677
Drives: 09 370z Blk 6mt sprt
Rep Power: 260 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
dszombiex was joking. Some of you are way to up tight. Any of you who took him serious i dont know what to say other than relax.
You guys already treating him like hes the Shamwow guy hahaha.
__________________
my pictures http://www.the370z.com/members/forrest-albums-370z.html |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Z for the wife Part 2 | wooya21 | New 370Z Owner | 7 | 07-16-2009 07:49 PM |
| Z for the wife | wooya21 | New 370Z Owner | 17 | 07-10-2009 03:15 AM |
| *PICS* MKIV for the wife | Solus | Other Vehicles | 14 | 06-11-2009 02:50 PM |
| How to convince the wife/significant other that you NEED a 370z | dutty370Z | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 78 | 12-29-2008 11:03 AM |