![]() |
im not a huge history buff when it comes to nissan so correct me if im wrong. but from what i understand, nissan has always been disappointed in sales when
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Base Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: new orleans
Posts: 105
Drives: 07 350z
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
im not a huge history buff when it comes to nissan so correct me if im wrong. but from what i understand, nissan has always been disappointed in sales when it comes to factory boosted mid price range cars. also, since the Z has been in the same general price range for the past couple years, the tone has been set for it's reputation. those who would be able to afford a $50k car would not want to spend it on a Z.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Gump, AL
Posts: 37
Drives: 01BB6 Pearl White MT
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Nissan does not need to make the Z car too fast, cause then how would they sale any GTRs. Yeah, people would still buy it just to own a GTR but if people are at all like me, Everyone would buy the GTR performance at the Z price. I don't see a TT Z any time in the next decade, but who knows we will all prolly be driving around in our Electric Z hyper-performance cars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 94
Drives: 350z
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 94
Drives: 350z
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|