![]() |
Originally Posted by edk370 I'm gonna digress a little, but you'll see what I'm talking about. Toyota no longer offers a "mid range" sports car like the Supra tt MKIV.
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) | |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Vancouver Island,Canada
Posts: 341
Drives: '11 370z Nismo MB
Rep Power: 2479 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Last edited by Tick64; 08-11-2013 at 04:38 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: monticello new york 127
Posts: 1,095
Drives: 08 350z black 6m/t
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
At the end of 08 Nissan gave a 5k rebate for the 08's. The 09's were out & that rebate + $2k profit made the dealers offer $7k-$8k discounts. Some people got great cars (08's) at a fantastic price.
If the new Z gets smaller with a 4cyl., I'd love to see that discount on the 2014's. My new car??? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Georgia
Posts: 15
Drives: 07 Subaru WRX
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
![]()
I wouldn't count on that happening. Right now Nissan has lowered the price on the 2014 base model over $3000 and they're offering no incentive (other than 0% APR) to move the 2013's. Dealers are literally going to lose money on their 2013's.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: monticello new york 127
Posts: 1,095
Drives: 08 350z black 6m/t
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Imagine the discount/lowered price in Aug. of 2014 ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 (permalink) | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: monticello new york 127
Posts: 1,095
Drives: 08 350z black 6m/t
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() What does that have to do with a possible huge discount by mid/end of 2014? Today Aug. 2013 is $3,000 lowered + dealer profit. You think a year from now, especially if a new model comes out, the discount will not be bigger??? My last post on this subject. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Georgia
Posts: 15
Drives: 07 Subaru WRX
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
![]()
I think you're misunderstanding what I'm saying. Nissan is not discounting (as in offering dealer incentives or rebates) in order to move the 2013's. This is very odd considering that they lowered the price of the 2014's. The effect is that their dealers are hit with a pretty immediate loss on their inventory. Given that they'd hang dealers out like this, I'm doubting that they are going to care when the same thing happens a year from now. It's just my take. We'll see.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: NM
Posts: 8,063
Drives: Awedeeeeee
Rep Power: 603 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
I agree with everyone above on pretty much every point. But I would like to point out something I've been noticing recently and if it is a trend then I wouldn't expect to see anything in 2016 that'll impress in terms of a new Z or even the likes of one.
For example, the 200HP engine has been the benchmark number for how many years now? 14? 15? Even so, it seems manufacturers are only trying to acheive those same numbers with smaller and smaller engines that are more fuel efficient. The new Honda Accord "Sport" model only has, what, 185? Sport? Give me a break. What I'm saying is they keep re-generating the same numbers and the only battle now is for fuel economy. They don't really care about hp anymore as long as they get close. BMW drops the 8cyl in the M3 for a turbo-6. And what are the figures? only 6 more ponies than last year. Whoopie-do! The FRS? I drove one again the other day here in Las Cruces because I was bored. Handling was fine. But it was sooooo damn slooowww! It made it almost unbearable. I think my 138hp rental car has more torque. What it comes down to really is this... performance figures are all but out the window. The battle is fuel economy in ever larger vehicles and soon every damn engine will have a turbo on it and will be direct injected. Not necessarily a bad thing but it will begin to limit the ability to do much to the motor for performance gains since they are getter ever smaller in displacement and most will be 1.6L or smaller and will soon likely come coupled with batteries as a standard feature. So if they decide to compete with the FRS in 2016, expect low performance figures and specs. I would expect a performance drop with the Z as well if they so choose to bring it back in 2016 as an overhauled vehicle. It'll be underpowered but that's ok as long as it is 100 pounds lighter. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Georgia
Posts: 15
Drives: 07 Subaru WRX
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
![]()
I agree with what you're saying, but I'll also add another point. Most performance car oriented drivers do not have the skills to match the higher performance cars that are out there anyway. Therefore, other than bragging rights, there's nothing in it for most drivers when they gain additional HP.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pioneer Bluetooth Mic Improvement, any idea? | cossie1600 | Audio & Video | 11 | 06-28-2013 10:56 AM |
Fuel economy improvement with Berk HFCs and FI CBEs | KingJoseph | Nismo 370Z | 3 | 05-25-2013 12:53 AM |
Drop in K&N filter already showing improvement | wat2win | Engine & Drivetrain | 11 | 03-21-2011 10:02 AM |
Paint Improvement over 350? | KManZ | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 0 | 04-01-2009 06:35 AM |