Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Nissan 370Z General Discussions (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/)
-   -   Lots of wrecked Z's... (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/47250-lots-wrecked-zs.html)

Pharmacist 12-28-2011 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed (Post 1465735)
bad balance is actually great in snow. tons of weight over the front axle means you can turn and stop very easily in poor traction conditions.

i disagree. it also means the rear of the car is prone to losing traction, especially under braking. i used to have a chrysler intrepid, and all the drivetrain (engine, gearbox, diff) was IN FRONT of the front wheels. brake a bit too hard and the back end would get light on its wheels. Occasionally that led to a bit of minor fishtailing under braking. Nothing the ABS didn't fix but it still did happen.

Alchemy 12-28-2011 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeffblue (Post 1465746)
the best way to avoid accidents on the street is defensive driving. Defensive driving has much more of an impact then how well you can throw your car around a corner at a road course. Every time i approach an intersection, i assume some a-hole is going to make a left turn in front of me because they aren't paying attention.

horsepower doesn't matter in snow or inclement weather. Does horsepower matter when you stop? no. A high HP car will only handle worse in the snow/rain than a lower hp car if the driver is doing something they shouldn't be doing anyway, which is getting on the throttle hard during the turn.

most snow accidents aren't the result of accelerating and lost traction. They are when someone tries to stop and the car keeps sliding. or when they try to turn and the car keeps going straight.

Z's just seem like they are more accident prone because they are less expensive than corvettes and more accessible to people will poorer judgement.

I completely agree with Jeff here. Defensive driving is super important. Im constantly ready for some d1ckbag to pull something stupid.

m4a1mustang 12-28-2011 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pharmacist (Post 1465750)
i disagree. it also means the rear of the car is prone to losing traction, especially under braking. i used to have a chrysler intrepid, and all the drivetrain (engine, gearbox, diff) was IN FRONT of the front wheels. brake a bit too hard and the back end would get light on its wheels. Occasionally that led to a bit of minor fishtailing under braking. Nothing the ABS didn't fix but it still did happen.

You were going too fast for the conditions. I can get the back end to step out in my car on snow tires under braking if I am going too fast... :rolleyes:

More rear weight makes the rear of the car want to overtake the front when you attempt to stop quickly... especially if turning. If you have more weight on the front, the car tends to track much straighter... Simple physics.

There's a reason why the older 911s were notorious for ridiculous amounts of oversteer... all that weight over the rear axle.

toxik 12-28-2011 10:54 AM

I'm not going to be the one to say it, but lets face it, a lot of 370z's are being totaled as insurance fraud simply because the owners realize they rather own a 5.0

Pharmacist 12-28-2011 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeffblue (Post 1465746)
the best way to avoid accidents on the street is defensive driving. Defensive driving has much more of an impact then how well you can throw your car around a corner at a road course. Every time i approach an intersection, i assume some a-hole is going to make a left turn in front of me because they aren't paying attention.

horsepower doesn't matter in snow or inclement weather. Does horsepower matter when you stop? no. A high HP car will only handle worse in the snow/rain than a lower hp car if the driver is doing something they shouldn't be doing anyway, which is getting on the throttle hard during the turn.

most snow accidents aren't the result of accelerating and lost traction. They are when someone tries to stop and the car keeps sliding. or when they try to turn and the car keeps going straight.

Z's just seem like they are more accident prone because they are less expensive than corvettes and more accessible to people will poorer judgement.

indeed, an a-hole making a left turn is what destroyed my car a month ago. I agree with almost all you're saying. Except, that higher hp cars are still more difficult to handle than lower hp cars. Even at partial throttle, a car with a bigger engine will still be delivering more torque to the wheels than a car with a smaller engine assuming the same throttle position. More torque delivered to the wheels increases the chances of power oversteer. Especially with a car like a corvette or a viper that produces a lot of torque even at very low rpm.

m4a1mustang 12-28-2011 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pharmacist (Post 1465763)
indeed, an a-hole making a left turn is what destroyed my car a month ago. I agree with almost all you're saying. Except, that higher hp cars are still more difficult to handle than lower hp cars. Even at partial throttle, a car with a bigger engine will still be delivering more torque to the wheels than a car with a smaller engine assuming the same throttle position. More torque delivered to the wheels increases the chances of power oversteer. Especially with a car like a corvette or a viper that produces a lot of torque even at very low rpm.

More difficult to handle for an inexperienced driver, perhaps...

But to anyone that knows wtf they are doing there is no difference.

Red__Zed 12-28-2011 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pharmacist (Post 1465750)
i disagree. it also means the rear of the car is prone to losing traction, especially under braking. i used to have a chrysler intrepid, and all the drivetrain (engine, gearbox, diff) was IN FRONT of the front wheels. brake a bit too hard and the back end would get light on its wheels. Occasionally that led to a bit of minor fishtailing under braking. Nothing the ABS didn't fix but it still did happen.

you can easily recovery by braking less. try making that same move in a mid-engine car, and the rear end won't step back in line...hell, even in a properly balanced front midship design, you might have some trouble getting the rear end back in place

m4a1mustang 12-28-2011 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed (Post 1465766)
you can easily recovery by braking less. try making that same move in a mid-engine car, and the rear end won't step back in line...hell, even in a properly balanced front midship design, you might have some trouble getting the rear end back in place

Agreed.

b1adesofcha0s 12-28-2011 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by toxik (Post 1465758)
I'm not going to be the one to say it, but lets face it, a lot of 370z's are being totaled as insurance fraud simply because the owners realize they rather own a 5.0

:bowrofl: :bowrofl: :bowrofl:

Pharmacist 12-28-2011 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m4a1mustang (Post 1465754)
You were going too fast for the conditions. I can get the back end to step out in my car on snow tires under braking if I am going too fast... :rolleyes:

More rear weight makes the rear of the car want to overtake the front when you attempt to stop quickly... especially if turning. If you have more weight on the front, the car tends to track much straighter... Simple physics.

There's a reason why the older 911s were notorious for ridiculous amounts of oversteer... all that weight over the rear axle.

actually i'm talking about braking in a straight line. a lighter rear end is more prone to fishtailing under hard braking. yes in a corner the opposite is true, and the car will tend to understeer. but in a straight line, with the car diving under hard braking, with all the drivetrain weight on the front wheels, the rear wheels are very prone to losing grip. that's why many older pickup trucks used to come with ABS only on the rear axle.

Jeffblue 12-28-2011 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pharmacist (Post 1465763)
indeed, an a-hole making a left turn is what destroyed my car a month ago. I agree with almost all you're saying. Except, that higher hp cars are still more difficult to handle than lower hp cars. Even at partial throttle, a car with a bigger engine will still be delivering more torque to the wheels than a car with a smaller engine assuming the same throttle position. More torque delivered to the wheels increases the chances of power oversteer. Especially with a car like a corvette or a viper that produces a lot of torque even at very low rpm.

what you are saying makes sense, but we are human and we can adapt. If you have to push your gas pedal down 3/4 of the way in a corolla to get it to move, you don't get in a viper and do the same thing. obviously if you give the same amount of gas in a higher hp/larger displacement car it will produce more power at a lower rpm. But as i said, we can adapt.

i just recently reflashed my 335, and now its probably got about 100 more lbft of torque at the wheels at 2500 rpm. So if i press the gas the same way i used to to gingerly get off the line, it's going to put down a lot more power. so i just give it less throttle. i have no problems driving it just as slow as i used to even with the added power. it really should be no problem to drive a fast car slowly, just don't put your foot down as much. :rolleyes:

Pharmacist 12-28-2011 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m4a1mustang (Post 1465765)
More difficult to handle for an inexperienced driver, perhaps...

But to anyone that knows wtf they are doing there is no difference.

so if you had a viper srt 10 to drive year round, you'd just put snow tires and continue as usual? :ugh2:
Quote:

you can easily recovery by braking less. try making that same move in a mid-engine car, and the rear end won't step back in line...hell, even in a properly balanced front midship design, you might have some trouble getting the rear end back in place
never driven a mid engine car, but i drove a few front midship cars and actually i felt they were very stable under braking. And braking less is not always an option on the street. What if a guy cuts you off? Or a bus unexpectedly pulls out of the bus bay? Or a pedestrian decides to jaywalk across the street right in front of you?

Pharmacist 12-28-2011 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by toxik (Post 1465758)
I'm not going to be the one to say it, but lets face it, a lot of 370z's are being totaled as insurance fraud simply because the owners realize they rather own a 5.0

:icon18: actually i thought most of those who got the mustang traded their cars in.

m4a1mustang 12-28-2011 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pharmacist (Post 1465771)
actually i'm talking about braking in a straight line. a lighter rear end is more prone to fishtailing under hard braking. yes in a corner the opposite is true, and the car will tend to understeer. but in a straight line, with the car diving under hard braking, with all the drivetrain weight on the front wheels, the rear wheels are very prone to losing grip. that's why many older pickup trucks used to come with ABS only on the rear axle.

It's also easy to regain traction under braking in a car with a lot of weight on the front axle by letting off the brake like Red__Zed mentioned. It's very easy to get it under control. And yes while the rear end might feel like it's sliding around back there, all of the cars mass is at the front and is most likely going to keep a fairly straight track... and if it doesn't it's easy enough to correct.

Now if you try to stop all of that mass on the *** end of a 911 from coming around under hard braking... good luck.

cossie1600 12-28-2011 11:06 AM

The car has ABS/EBD. How the f do you lose your backend braking in a straight line unless you are in the snow or your car is busted. I mean you might hit ice mode and lose all your braking, but very seldom does the car lose the backend and swing it around.

m4a1mustang 12-28-2011 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pharmacist (Post 1465779)
so if you had a viper srt 10 to drive year round, you'd just put snow tires and continue as usual? :ugh2:

never driven a mid engine car, but i drove a few front midship cars and actually i felt they were very stable under braking. And braking less is not always an option on the street. What if a guy cuts you off? Or a bus unexpectedly pulls out of the bus bay? Or a pedestrian decides to jaywalk across the street right in front of you?

If I had an SRT-10 Viper I'd obviously have some other cars... but yes, if you said, "Steve... the ONLY car you can drive this winter is an SRT-10" I would slap Blizzaks on it and be fine. Obviously I wouldn't be able to drive in deep snow, but on freshly plowed, snow-packed roads or very light accumulations I would be 100% fine. :tup:

m4a1mustang 12-28-2011 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cossie1600 (Post 1465788)
The car has ABS/EBD. How the f do you lose your backend braking in a straight line unless you are in the snow or your car is busted. I mean you might hit ice mode and lose all your braking, but very seldom does the car lose the backend and swing it around.

Shhhh this is an anti-physics discussion based on theory and no real-world experience.

Pharmacist 12-28-2011 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeffblue (Post 1465776)
what you are saying makes sense, but we are human and we can adapt. If you have to push your gas pedal down 3/4 of the way in a corolla to get it to move, you don't get in a viper and do the same thing. obviously if you give the same amount of gas in a higher hp/larger displacement car it will produce more power at a lower rpm. But as i said, we can adapt.

i just recently reflashed my 335, and now its probably got about 100 more lbft of torque at the wheels at 2500 rpm. So if i press the gas the same way i used to to gingerly get off the line, it's going to put down a lot more power. so i just give it less throttle. i have no problems driving it just as slow as i used to even with the added power. it really should be no problem to drive a fast car slowly, just don't put your foot down as much. :rolleyes:

true, except you're wrong in one thing. Even if you go 100% full throttle in a corolla, you're still delivering less power and torque to the wheel than the viper engine does to its wheels even at idle at 0% throttle :roflpuke2:

b1adesofcha0s 12-28-2011 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m4a1mustang (Post 1465792)
Shhhh this is an anti-physics discussion based on theory and no real-world experience.

I think we need to consult the leading expert in theoretical physics.....

( Click to show/hide )

FL 4Motion 12-28-2011 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m4a1mustang (Post 1465790)
If I had an SRT-10 Viper I'd obviously have some other cars... but yes, if you said, "Steve... the ONLY car you can drive this winter is an SRT-10" I would slap Blizzaks on it and be fine. Obviously I wouldn't be able to drive in deep snow, but on freshly plowed, snow-packed roads or very light accumulations I would be 100% fine. :tup:

I love your self confidence, it's very endearing.

Red__Zed 12-28-2011 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pharmacist (Post 1465779)
so if you had a viper srt 10 to drive year round, you'd just put snow tires and continue as usual? :ugh2: never driven a mid engine car, but i drove a few front midship cars and actually i felt they were very stable under braking. And braking less is not always an option on the street. What if a guy cuts you off? Or a bus unexpectedly pulls out of the bus bay? Or a pedestrian decides to jaywalk across the street right in front of you?

simply put, if you don't have the ability to brake with tons of weight on the front axles, you don't have it at all. Besides, if it's a pedestrian you are avoiding, let the rear end come out-- who cares?

I'm curious what front mid-ship cars you've driven since you've never driven another RWD car.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Pharmacist (Post 1465771)
actually i'm talking about braking in a straight line. a lighter rear end is more prone to fishtailing under hard braking. yes in a corner the opposite is true, and the car will tend to understeer. but in a straight line, with the car diving under hard braking, with all the drivetrain weight on the front wheels, the rear wheels are very prone to losing grip. that's why many older pickup trucks used to come with ABS only on the rear axle.

they'll lose grip but they really aren't if there's not much weight out back. besides, lighten up on the pedal if that happens...

m4a1mustang 12-28-2011 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FL 4Motion (Post 1465800)
I love your self confidence, it's very endearing.

It's just so simple. I mean, the SRT-10 makes something around 200 hp at 3,500 rpm or so. Probably something on the order of 400 lb-ft at that RPM. Totally driveable with a good snow tire and weight over the rear, especially with the tall gearing!

Jeffblue 12-28-2011 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pharmacist (Post 1465779)
so if you had a viper srt 10 to drive year round, you'd just put snow tires and continue as usual? :ugh2: never driven a mid engine car, but i drove a few front midship cars and actually i felt they were very stable under braking. And braking less is not always an option on the street. What if a guy cuts you off? Or a bus unexpectedly pulls out of the bus bay? Or a pedestrian decides to jaywalk across the street right in front of you?

no matter how well a car handles, it can't make up for poor judgement. If you are speeding down a school zone in a lotus or an escalade, its stupid. In the lotus you can stop more quickly and change direction more easily, but its still stupid
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pharmacist (Post 1465794)
true, except you're wrong in one thing. Even if you go 100% full throttle in a corolla, you're still delivering less power and torque to the wheel than the viper engine does to its wheels even at idle at 0% throttle :roflpuke2:

really? i didn't realize cars delivered power to the wheels when the car is in neutral.

Red__Zed 12-28-2011 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FL 4Motion (Post 1465800)
I love your self confidence, it's very endearing.

steve's a very good driver. he was able to pilot a 5.0 faster than the 370z's at zdayz, and since we all know it wasn't the car....

Pharmacist 12-28-2011 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cossie1600 (Post 1465788)
The car has ABS/EBD. How the f do you lose your backend braking in a straight line unless you are in the snow or your car is busted. I mean you might hit ice mode and lose all your braking, but very seldom does the car lose the backend and swing it around.

it was snowy. And i didn't lose the back end or anything. The rear just wiggled a bit.
Quote:

If I had an SRT-10 Viper I'd obviously have some other cars... but yes, if you said, "Steve... the ONLY car you can drive this winter is an SRT-10" I would slap Blizzaks on it and be fine. Obviously I wouldn't be able to drive in deep snow, but on freshly plowed, snow-packed roads or very light accumulations I would be 100% fine.
You're still assuming you will be at 100% and paying full attention. We're talking about street driving here. Imagine finishing a 12 h shift. You're tired, hungry, and have a headache. And it starts raining or snowing. Rank the following cars according to which one you'll feel safer driving: 1) Viper srt 10, 2) 370z, 3) toyota corolla.

m4a1mustang 12-28-2011 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pharmacist (Post 1465810)
it was snowy. And i didn't lose the back end or anything. The rear just wiggled a bit. You're still assuming you will be at 100% and paying full attention. We're talking about street driving here. Imagine finishing a 12 h shift. You're tired, hungry, and have a headache. And it starts raining or snowing. Rank the following cars according to which one you'll feel safer driving: 1) Viper srt 10, 2) 370z, 3) toyota corolla.

I'd still be fine in either one.

And if I was tired to the point where it was unsafe for me to drive, I wouldn't drive.

m4a1mustang 12-28-2011 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pharmacist (Post 1465810)
it was snowy. And i didn't lose the back end or anything. The rear just wiggled a bit.

Earlier you were implying that all that weight up front made the back step out under hard braking in the snow... now you are saying it just wiggled.

Alchemy 12-28-2011 11:23 AM

Lol 22 users now. This thread is so active its put the conference room on freeze. Got all the trolls, I mean OG's in here.

b1adesofcha0s 12-28-2011 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pharmacist (Post 1465810)
it was snowy. And i didn't lose the back end or anything. The rear just wiggled a bit. You're still assuming you will be at 100% and paying full attention. We're talking about street driving here. Imagine finishing a 12 h shift. You're tired, hungry, and have a headache. And it starts raining or snowing. Rank the following cars according to which one you'll feel safer driving: 1) Viper srt 10, 2) 370z, 3) toyota corolla.

You keep changing the situation and conditions to try and force him to not pick the Viper!

Pharmacist 12-28-2011 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed (Post 1465803)
simply put, if you don't have the ability to brake with tons of weight on the front axles, you don't have it at all. Besides, if it's a pedestrian you are avoiding, let the rear end come out-- who cares?

I'm curious what front mid-ship cars you've driven since you've never driven another RWD car.




they'll lose grip but they really aren't if there's not much weight out back. besides, lighten up on the pedal if that happens...

Which FM car I drove? a couple of infiniti awd g coupes. none was mine but i drove them a few times. and the point wasn't my braking ability. I am perfectly capable of braking, though thanks for your advice :ugh2: The point was that "tons of weight over the front axle" is not necessarily a good thing to have on a car.

m4a1mustang 12-28-2011 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pharmacist (Post 1465823)
The point was that "tons of weight over the front axle" is not necessarily a good thing to have on a car.

Because the back end might wiggle.

Pharmacist 12-28-2011 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeffblue (Post 1465808)
no matter how well a car handles, it can't make up for poor judgement. If you are speeding down a school zone in a lotus or an escalade, its stupid. In the lotus you can stop more quickly and change direction more easily, but its still stupid


really? i didn't realize cars delivered power to the wheels when the car is in neutral.

you do realize that you don't have to go "speeding down a school zone" in order for someone to cut you off and force hard braking, right?

Red__Zed 12-28-2011 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pharmacist (Post 1465823)
Which FM car I drove? a couple of infiniti awd g coupes. none was mine but i drove them a few times. and the point wasn't my braking ability. I am perfectly capable of braking, though thanks for your advice :ugh2: The point was that "tons of weight over the front axle" is not necessarily a good thing to have on a car.

no, it's an awful thing. it causes cars to push through the turns and slows you down. but it generates the behavior you love in the Z, and makes snow driving pretty easy.


neither the Z nor the G are true FMR designs btw.

Red__Zed 12-28-2011 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pharmacist (Post 1465826)
you do realize that you don't have to go "speeding down a school zone" in order for someone to cut you off and force hard braking, right?

no but it sure helps make sure those situations crop up more often.

Pharmacist 12-28-2011 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m4a1mustang (Post 1465813)
Earlier you were implying that all that weight up front made the back step out under hard braking in the snow... now you are saying it just wiggled.

no, it just wiggled. it didn't step out as in spin out or anything. Just a bit of wiggling. Like I said, the ABS takes care of it. The point though is too much weight on the front wheels can make the back unstable if you brake too hard.

Pharmacist 12-28-2011 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by b1adesofcha0s (Post 1465822)
You keep changing the situation and conditions to try and force him to not pick the Viper!

lol! :icon18:

Pharmacist 12-28-2011 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m4a1mustang (Post 1465824)
Because the back end might wiggle.

glad we agree on something :happydance:

Red__Zed 12-28-2011 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pharmacist (Post 1465835)
no, it just wiggled. it didn't step out as in spin out or anything. Just a bit of wiggling. Like I said, the ABS takes care of it. The point though is too much weight on the front wheels can make the back unstable if you brake too hard.

and not enough weight on the front end means you don't stop. I'd definitely try to avoid the wiggling though. sounds dangerous.

Pharmacist 12-28-2011 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed (Post 1465840)
and not enough weight on the front end means you don't stop.

why? You've got 4 brakes. The rear wheels still do provide braking power. If anything, braking the rear wheels helps keep the car pointed straight.

Jeffblue 12-28-2011 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pharmacist (Post 1465810)
it was snowy. And i didn't lose the back end or anything. The rear just wiggled a bit. You're still assuming you will be at 100% and paying full attention. We're talking about street driving here. Imagine finishing a 12 h shift. You're tired, hungry, and have a headache. And it starts raining or snowing. Rank the following cars according to which one you'll feel safer driving: 1) Viper srt 10, 2) 370z, 3) toyota corolla.

jesus christ... might as well ask "which of these cars would you rather drive in the middle of a blizzard, drunk, while getting a BJ from megan fox?" he said that he would feel comfortable driving any of them. enough said

so are you trying to figure out which is the best car to own just in case you need to recover or brake last minute if run into the circumstance that you are driving in terrible weather and not paying attention?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2