![]() |
Originally Posted by zman1910 I don't know what's so hard to believe.... Infiniti G37 sedan 6MT - 0-60 5.2 sec 1/4 mile - 13.9 @ 103mph Infiniti G37 sedan 7AT
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: bham al
Posts: 91
Drives: 05 g sedan 6mt
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: FL
Posts: 361
Drives: 2011 Audi S4
Rep Power: 430 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
The most important point to take from this is that it is even harder to screw up straight line acceleration in an AUTO. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: bham al
Posts: 91
Drives: 05 g sedan 6mt
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Quote:
For example, in an article that compared the g35 sedan against the bmw 330(before the 335), amongst others, the best time they were able to wring out of the was something like 14.5 at roughly 100mph. And that was *corrected*. I've got the same car, and with highflow cats, it ran 13.7@102mph. Stock, it ran 14 flat at 101mph. Automatics will be harder to screw up, and they will be more consistent. But until you mess with the torque converter, the manuals will be able to launch harder. That's a fact. In the real world, the manuals will be faster than the autos - that is, until you start running major boost. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: FL
Posts: 361
Drives: 2011 Audi S4
Rep Power: 430 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
As I stated before the only thing you can take out of this is what they are showing you which is the auto is faster in a straight line. Whether you want to believe or not is up to you. I will believe it since this isn't the only car it has been proven in. And I highly doubt we will ever see a comparison set in ideal conditions. I have rarely ever read of a car being tested on the same day/time with the same conditions and the same driver. It'll almost never happen so this is all we have to go by and usually mag times are reproducible and somewhat accurate. Hell even most above average drivers can best these times as has been proven on many occasions. Last edited by zman1910; 04-29-2009 at 02:29 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MotorTrend First Test: 2009 Nissan 370Z test drive 4.7 sec 0 to 60 11.25.08 | AK370Z | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 47 | 11-11-2009 08:06 PM |
| MotorWeek Road Test: 2009 Nissan 370Z | dlmartin81 | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 10 | 03-16-2009 12:59 AM |
| 2009 Nissan 370Z - "NEW" Road Test By Car and Drive 02.04.09 | AK370Z | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 6 | 02-05-2009 08:06 PM |
| ROAD & TRACK Video - Full Test: 2009 Nissan 370Z | sbsmoov | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 4 | 12-01-2008 11:05 PM |
| Great C&D article... 2009 Nissan 370Z - Road Test | ctzn | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 21 | 12-01-2008 04:34 PM |