![]() |
Quote:
I looked at both the Z and the Cayman, and I know the quality of the materials in the Porsche as supposedly better (Real suede, better cows died, maybe the clear coat was more expensive, I don't know, but it looked and felt the same). I just know that I would be very sad if all I got was the badge on the front and the uber-high service bills. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
vir grand not so much
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sure the porsche engine is quieter and overall storage space is double, but broken in two. The Z is a more attractive package between the two price points. The porsche steering wheel and console is bland. The Z looks more sporty inside. What I do like about the cayman is that its lower to the ground and shorter in height. But I can modify my car to be lower and do 171 for a whole lot cheaper than a porsche, yet maintenence will be lower as well as insurance. If I buy a porsche it would be one of the turbo 911 variants. And I can't afford that. :( ill stick with my Z and when its paid off. I will buy a used GT-R. :) |
Quote:
|
I'm just excited that the Z was in an article. lol
|
I am getting a Chikane yellow 2009 this weekend. It has Fairlady Z on the rear end. Is this significant? I know the yellow 2009 model was to commemorate an original 240 color. Also did the Fairladies have a Sports package equivalent. This has the big brakes, wheels and tires and also front a rear spoiler but there is no mention of a stiffer suspension that the sport package includes in the 2010 and 2011 models. Thanks
|
Dude, some ricer slapped a badge on it....
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:34 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2