![]() |
Originally Posted by klubbheads I'm kind of surprised on acceleration numbers on the Z when it comes to 100mph and up. I would think it would be faster than the
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: west
Posts: 245
Drives: some car
Rep Power: 187 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
why would you assume so? the VQ obviously chokes and has a hard time revving up to give the extra hp. still gotta remember the VQ is still a bored out version of a 3.0 liter. nissan needs a new engine soon
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: North Hollywood, CA
Posts: 221
Drives: Very slow Nismo 370
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Quote:
![]() The reason is that the gears are too tall for the G37/370z. from 2nd gear all the way to fifth are very long considering the car has a high-reving motor. If the gear ratios were the same as the first gen G35 with 6th gear actually being a gear not overdrive, then this car would have been much much quicker. As people start putting 4.01 FD on this car which i will probably do, you will see how much difference it makes in the acceleration. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Road & Track gets it wrong | semtex | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 45 | 05-02-2009 08:28 PM |
| Road and Track tests 370Z (no 56K) | Namir | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 20 | 02-23-2009 09:50 AM |
| ROAD & TRACK Video - Full Test: 2009 Nissan 370Z | sbsmoov | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 4 | 12-01-2008 11:05 PM |
| Road and Track: Top 5 Twisty-Road Tamers, Nissan 370Z | AK370Z | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 2 | 11-28-2008 03:51 PM |
| Road and Track Magazine recent news on the 370Z | admin | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 0 | 09-26-2008 03:55 AM |