2011 Mustang GT... I think I need to re-think my next car

LiquidZ · 03-30-2010, 07:52 AM

Sorry Matt, I fail to see it. The interior is supposed to be retro, but I don't see it here.

370ZGhost · 03-30-2010, 08:48 AM

Ya Buy the Stang if you want to Drag and be upside down in it even if you plan to put 5000-6000 down. the 370z holds itself in the corners and holds its resale value alot better. I believe it won a award from kbb...sports car with the best resale value in its class...and domestic cars resale drops like a rock.

SeeyaBud86 · 03-30-2010, 08:48 AM

Here is the difference plain and simple.

I see literally 5 2010 Mustangs everytime I get on the road(which is generally a 10 minute drive because Naples is a small city). The 350z was a very common car, as with the Mustang, but the 370 on the other hand is a little more exclusive. Mustangs are generic, plain and simple. Most people buy a Mustang because:
A. It looks fast(which is debatable)
B. The average person thinks Mustangs are fast simply because of American Tradition
C. Most teenage kids ask their parents for a Mustang GT in high school, which also ties into B^^

Some people also pick the 370 (and all Z's) for the same reasons as well. But, I think a higher % of people who buy the Z's actually buy it because its an all around good performance car. I could have gotten more power and a faster car if I wanted to, but I wanted more for my money. Who cares if your "sports coupe" is fast in a straight line, but handles like an SUV in the twistys. Thats like having a hot wife that you can only look at, but not touch. The Z is an agile wide receiver, while the Mustang is a 450lb (arguably 500lb) linebacker.

That being said. The new 5.0 GT is very, very impressive. It looks the same as the 2010 GT (everyone who bought that got screwed), and it does have some eye popping numbers. The Brembo brake package is really great, as well with an aluminum block(finally, welcome to 2010 Ford). But the only Mustang that I would ever look at is the 2013 model, which is rumored to actually have an independent rear axle. This will actually make the Stang handle decently.

So to the OP here is the verdict:

Mustang for street(cocktail party talk - probably more like frat party talk)
Z for all around performance (Back/side street weapon - After Stillen S/C it will be faster than Stang anyways.)

NewYorkJon34 · 03-30-2010, 09:34 AM

Very well said bro, case closed if you ask me, but I'll add 1 thing. Up intill now failure*, oh I mean ford has been selling customers a sorry excuse for a V8 for years, and that goes for most special edition mustangs as well aka. Roush. To the OP, Argue if you want, but the only ford I'd ever consider buying would be 1 with a shelby name on it like the new gt350. Other then that just go with the 370Z, you'll never regret it. It's a great platform to start modding, and IMO it just might be the ultimate car in every catagory.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SeeyaBud86

Here is the difference plain and simple.

I see literally 5 2010 Mustangs everytime I get on the road(which is generally a 10 minute drive because Naples is a small city). The 350z was a very common car, as with the Mustang, but the 370 on the other hand is a little more exclusive. Mustangs are generic, plain and simple. Most people buy a Mustang because:
A. It looks fast(which is debatable)
B. The average person thinks Mustangs are fast simply because of American Tradition
C. Most teenage kids ask their parents for a Mustang GT in high school, which also ties into B^^

Some people also pick the 370 (and all Z's) for the same reasons as well. But, I think a higher % of people who buy the Z's actually buy it because its an all around good performance car. I could have gotten more power and a faster car if I wanted to, but I wanted more for my money. Who cares if your "sports coupe" is fast in a straight line, but handles like an SUV in the twistys. Thats like having a hot wife that you can only look at, but not touch. The Z is an agile wide receiver, while the Mustang is a 450lb (arguably 500lb) linebacker.

That being said. The new 5.0 GT is very, very impressive. It looks the same as the 2010 GT (everyone who bought that got screwed), and it does have some eye popping numbers. The Brembo brake package is really great, as well with an aluminum block(finally, welcome to 2010 Ford). But the only Mustang that I would ever look at is the 2013 model, which is rumored to actually have an independent rear axle. This will actually make the Stang handle decently.

So to the OP here is the verdict:

Mustang for street(cocktail party talk - probably more like frat party talk)
Z for all around performance (Back/side street weapon - After Stillen S/C it will be faster than Stang anyways.)

WICKED_GRIN · 03-30-2010, 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SeeyaBud86

Here is the difference plain and simple.

I see literally 5 2010 Mustangs everytime I get on the road(which is generally a 10 minute drive because Naples is a small city). The 350z was a very common car, as with the Mustang, but the 370 on the other hand is a little more exclusive. Mustangs are generic, plain and simple. Most people buy a Mustang because:
A. It looks fast(which is debatable)
B. The average person thinks Mustangs are fast simply because of American Tradition
C. Most teenage kids ask their parents for a Mustang GT in high school, which also ties into B^^

Some people also pick the 370 (and all Z's) for the same reasons as well. But, I think a higher % of people who buy the Z's actually buy it because its an all around good performance car. I could have gotten more power and a faster car if I wanted to, but I wanted more for my money. Who cares if your "sports coupe" is fast in a straight line, but handles like an SUV in the twistys. Thats like having a hot wife that you can only look at, but not touch. The Z is an agile wide receiver, while the Mustang is a 450lb (arguably 500lb) linebacker.

That being said. The new 5.0 GT is very, very impressive. It looks the same as the 2010 GT (everyone who bought that got screwed), and it does have some eye popping numbers. The Brembo brake package is really great, as well with an aluminum block(finally, welcome to 2010 Ford). But the only Mustang that I would ever look at is the 2013 model, which is rumored to actually have an independent rear axle. This will actually make the Stang handle decently.

So to the OP here is the verdict:

Mustang for street(cocktail party talk - probably more like frat party talk)
Z for all around performance (Back/side street weapon - After Stillen S/C it will be faster than Stang anyways.)

You are right……in 2014, it’s the Mustang 50th year anniversary! Twin Turbo V6, IRS etc. It might then be time to trade in my Roadster!! Or Maybe not……

Report: Next Ford Mustang to go global, adopt IRS

rednek01 · 03-30-2010, 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LiquidZ

Sorry Matt, I fail to see it. The interior is supposed to be retro, but I don't see it here.

do a little research

1967 mustang interior

2005-2009 mustang interior (first of the retro mustang modeled of 60's mustangs) ...Hint notice the dual big face gauges and dash line!

2010-2011+ a more modernized approach to the retro design (again there is a theme of the big dual gauges and the dashline which is all a bit more subtle also notice the center console area pretty similar shapes as well.

Matt · 03-30-2010, 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LiquidZ

Sorry Matt, I fail to see it. The interior is supposed to be retro, but I don't see it here.

So you agree with my coworkers when they felt the interior of the 2011 looked antiquated and ugly?

LiquidZ · 03-30-2010, 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt

So you agree with my coworkers when they felt the interior of the 2011 looked antiquated and ugly?

Hahahaha. I thought your coworkers were comparing the current interior to the image of the Fox's interior in your post.

I agree, the 60's era styling is an obvious influence on the current style. However, I don't see any similarities between the Fox's and the current.

03-30-2010, 07:52 AM	#1 (permalink)
LiquidZ A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Columbus, OH Posts: 1,940 Drives: Mag. Black 2009 370Z Rep Power: 706	Sorry Matt, I fail to see it. The interior is supposed to be retro, but I don't see it here. __________________

03-30-2010, 08:48 AM	#3 (permalink)
SeeyaBud86 Enthusiast Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Naples, FL Posts: 480 Drives: 09 PW 370z 6MT Rep Power: 18	Here is the difference plain and simple. I see literally 5 2010 Mustangs everytime I get on the road(which is generally a 10 minute drive because Naples is a small city). The 350z was a very common car, as with the Mustang, but the 370 on the other hand is a little more exclusive. Mustangs are generic, plain and simple. Most people buy a Mustang because: A. It looks fast(which is debatable) B. The average person thinks Mustangs are fast simply because of American Tradition C. Most teenage kids ask their parents for a Mustang GT in high school, which also ties into B^^ Some people also pick the 370 (and all Z's) for the same reasons as well. But, I think a higher % of people who buy the Z's actually buy it because its an all around good performance car. I could have gotten more power and a faster car if I wanted to, but I wanted more for my money. Who cares if your "sports coupe" is fast in a straight line, but handles like an SUV in the twistys. Thats like having a hot wife that you can only look at, but not touch. The Z is an agile wide receiver, while the Mustang is a 450lb (arguably 500lb) linebacker. That being said. The new 5.0 GT is very, very impressive. It looks the same as the 2010 GT (everyone who bought that got screwed), and it does have some eye popping numbers. The Brembo brake package is really great, as well with an aluminum block(finally, welcome to 2010 Ford). But the only Mustang that I would ever look at is the 2013 model, which is rumored to actually have an independent rear axle. This will actually make the Stang handle decently. So to the OP here is the verdict: Mustang for street(cocktail party talk - probably more like frat party talk) Z for all around performance (Back/side street weapon - After Stillen S/C it will be faster than Stang anyways.) __________________ My Z:http://www.the370z.com/members-370z-...l-finally.html 1969 MGB for sale: http://www.the370z.com/other-vehicle...ml#post1238143

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Wow keep this on your radar 2011 Z06/Z07	370z4Steve	Other Vehicles	2	03-10-2010 06:50 PM
Very Tempting - 2011 Shelby Mustang GT350	ZKindaGuy	Nissan 370Z General Discussions	66	02-12-2010 07:29 PM
2011 Mustang V6 Revealed	LiquidZ	Other Vehicles	56	01-20-2010 01:49 PM
2011 Mustang GT cutom wide body	Minicobra1	Other Vehicles	16	01-19-2010 12:32 AM
2011 GT-R to get facelift	MC	Other Vehicles	8	05-11-2009 08:55 AM

03-30-2010, 08:48 AM	#2 (permalink)
370ZGhost Base Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma Age: 39 Posts: 42 Drives: 10' 370Z Touring/Nav Rep Power: 17	Ya Buy the Stang if you want to Drag and be upside down in it even if you plan to put 5000-6000 down. the 370z holds itself in the corners and holds its resale value alot better. I believe it won a award from kbb...sports car with the best resale value in its class...and domestic cars resale drops like a rock.