![]() |
Originally Posted by Vegasboricua It is by all means a sports car. Originally Posted by nuTinmuch I mean, everyone is entitled to their own opinion and everything and I understand
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: US of A
Posts: 2,842
Drives: Answers
Rep Power: 34 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Then kindly remove the following (as they do not constitute a sports car):
The items above are convenience items and are not necessary for a sports car.
There is much more than can be dispensed with if you are qualifying the 370Z as a true sports car. Remove the items above and the 370Z will closer approach the true definition of a sports car. Another route is to commission Mine's to actually make your 370Z into a real sports cars. (Mine's are more than qualified to do so. But I'm willing to bet that there only a handful here who can afford the price tag.) So what was that definition of a sports car again? Thanks.
__________________
![]()
( Click to show/hide )
Last edited by SoCal 370Z; 02-17-2010 at 05:46 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
|
![]()
Don't straw man me, bro.
I simply said that the 370 was designed around a specific price point as a performance car. You have a complaint about the interior noise that a small but vocal number of people have, that's okay and I understand -- but to call it a failing? I think that is an exaggeration because of the type of car that it is. I wasn't saying that sound dampening or any of the other things you listed ruin the sports car experience, either. While you were very clearly trying to be smug as you made that list, if Nissan left out some of those things in the name of price I probably would've been okay with it. I also sort of think it is funny that you equate a minor amount of tire noise on dirty roads with things like air conditioning. I actually think Nissan should have released the Nismo as a bare-bones track version that had no stereo, lighter bucket seats, etc. I can understand why they didn't (cost/profitability) and I wouldn't call it a failing, though. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: US of A
Posts: 2,842
Drives: Answers
Rep Power: 34 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Maybe the smaller minority is the mature minority that didn’t really have to purchase a 370Z but chose to do so? Nissan should be happy we were interested. I have not knocked those who wish to decrease the weight of their Z; race their Z; add glass-shattering stereos to their Z. Not something I am interested in any longer (and I have no problem telling that to their face) but they are happy with doing so, and I'm happy for them. People have mentioned that they would enjoy less wheel well road debris noise and they are branded a minority of owners who do not understand sports cars or the premise of the Z? Well I'll be damned for being so out of place. Makes me regret actually purchasing a 240Z and a 280Z—when they were new. But then again, I'm in a minority.
__________________
![]()
( Click to show/hide )
Last edited by SoCal 370Z; 02-17-2010 at 07:01 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VTEC just kicked in yo | shumby | The Lounge (Off Topic) | 11 | 12-15-2008 09:14 AM |