![]() |
Originally Posted by frost That argument fools you into thinking it's good because it applies logical math, however, this argument assumes that handling is simply based on a power to
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 21
Drives: 2010 370Z
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Quote:
Mercedes S550 4Matic. Check out these stats, maybe I should take 'em to the Camaro forum since they seem so number happy. ![]() 382 horsepower and 391 lb-ft of torque, with 75% of peak torque available at just 1,000 rpm 0 to 60 mph in just 5.4 seconds. Curb Weight - 4,630 lbs (what about 700 pounds more than the Chevy?) Actually I agree with Frost about the class of people and you also have to take into consideration the build quality. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Fresno
Posts: 330
Drives: 03 ep3 vbp 6speed
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Ok what is this camaro>370z on the 1/4 mile? Trap speed yes the camaro is trapping 108 but still 13.3 same as the 370z with a driver not really beating on the car, trap speed so far on the z is 105.7 motor trend. This is done with WAY less torque what 154 ftlb less and 90 or so hp less. To me Nissan is deffinitely ahead of the American "beast" that is coming out.
__________________
I have a 350rwhp 1973 18rg turbo powered Toyota celica, a 2003 civic si which will be my down payment for a beautiful MONTEREY BLUE 370z. THE370Z.COM F'IN RULES! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Chevrolet Announces Pricing for the 2010 Camaro | AK370Z | Other Vehicles | 15 | 11-14-2009 11:53 AM |
| 370Z vs SS Camaro vs 135i | ohdeasu | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 50 | 12-15-2008 12:14 AM |