Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Nissan 370Z General Discussions (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/)
-   -   Mustang GT vs 370z, non-corporate unbias review! Finally!!! (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/110515-mustang-gt-vs-370z-non-corporate-unbias-review-finally.html)

carlitos_370z 02-03-2016 06:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by felix0121 (Post 3403747)
Lotus runs fast with comparatively little horsepower.

:)

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk

:iagree:

BTW the Lotus Exige S is one of my favorites cars by far! :tup:

TBatt 02-03-2016 07:54 AM

Fun Facts
 
I crunched some numbers just for my entertainment and thought I would share them with you.

370Z Base (non Nismo):
Displacement - 226 cubic inches
Horse Power - 332
= 1.46 HP/CI
Weight - 3232 Lb
= 9.73 Lb/HP

370Z Nismo:
Displacement - 226 cubic inches
Horse Power - 350
= 1.55 HP/CI
Weight 3232 (?)
= 9.23 Lb/HP

2015 Mustang GT 5.0:
Displacement - 302 cubic inches
Horse Power - 435
= 1.44 HP/CI
Weight - 3810 Lb
= 8.75 Lb/HP

The "old" VQ37HR engine produces MORE HP per cubic inch than the new Coyote 5.0

The 'Stang has a better power to weight ratio.

Performance advantage goes to the Mustang until you reach a corner. The lighter weight of the Z will give it a handling advantage. YMMV

TBatt 02-03-2016 08:24 AM

Fun Facts
 
I'm pretty sure the Mustang would win a drag race but the Z would win an autocross. At least that is what is happening around here.

Lots of factors involved, especially driver skills.

Z driver - "I did pretty good on that run"

Mustang driver - "somebody hold my beer, hey yaw, watch this!"

Dirk McGurck 02-03-2016 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TBatt (Post 3403850)
I crunched some numbers just for my entertainment and thought I would share them with you.

370Z Base (non Nismo):
Displacement - 226 cubic inches
Horse Power - 332
= 1.46 HP/CI
Weight - 3232 Lb
= 9.73 Lb/HP

370Z Nismo:
Displacement - 226 cubic inches
Horse Power - 350
= 1.55 HP/CI
Weight 3232 (?)
= 9.23 Lb/HP

2015 Mustang GT 5.0:
Displacement - 302 cubic inches
Horse Power - 435
= 1.44 HP/CI
Weight - 3810 Lb
= 8.75 Lb/HP

The "old" VQ37HR engine produces MORE HP per cubic inch than the new Coyote 5.0

The 'Stang has a better power to weight ratio.

Performance advantage goes to the Mustang until you reach a corner. The lighter weight of the Z will give it a handling advantage. YMMV

This points to why even an NA Z35 would be awesome. In 2009, the Mustang still had the 4.6L worth 315HP, now they're pushing out more with a more advanced engine that weighs roughly the same.

Then you have the Japanese manufacturers innovating structural design: the new Mazda 6 sedan weighs a couple hundred pounds less than our Zs and is quite a bit larger. Same with the Accord sedan. Look at the new Miata weighing almost nothing comparatively.

Really, Ford should have made a new Capri based off the Mustang that was smaller and had the 2.7L V6 from the F-series. That would be more of a Z competitor.

mishuko 02-03-2016 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by felix0121 (Post 3403747)
Lotus runs fast with comparatively little horsepower.

:)

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk

it's also a lot more raw than every other car on the market. but yes... they do make great power to weight ratio

Quote:

Originally Posted by TBatt (Post 3401175)
Some dealers are offering a free dog with a new mustang.......that way you will have someone to walk home with.....

Google Mustang jokes and be prepared to laugh your A$$ off!

I actually like the new 'stang but I like my Z better.

I liked the previous front design with the more nostalgic look. the new one is kinda eh.

I did like the rear tail lights and how the blinkers moved as you indicated. that was neat

ayrton88 02-03-2016 09:43 AM

Forget HP....do what Colin Chapman always advocated. "Add lightness". My only complaint with the Z is it weighs too much.

ped 02-03-2016 02:22 PM

I don't find my 2013 Touring with Sports pkg and all options to be dated in the slightest. The only thing I'd see needing updates are the nav screen/audio interfaces to include Android/Apple updates.

ped 02-03-2016 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by njobe89 (Post 3394509)
only mustang i'd want to own

( Click to show/hide )


i'd choose this over most cars you can offer me today

But why? Yes, they're cool looking. But compared to everything today those cars are slow, poor-handling, crappy brakes. I think once the generation who is currently robbing their retirement accounts to bid up these types of 1960s and 70s cars are gone, the prices on these will plummet like a rock.

njobe89 02-04-2016 07:08 AM

to me that's the best looking mustang, period. also, i highly doubt that their price will plummet.

carlitos_370z 02-04-2016 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by njobe89 (Post 3404591)
to me that's the best looking mustang, period. also, i highly doubt that their price will plummet.

:iagree:

Wheels3309 02-04-2016 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TBatt (Post 3403879)

Z driver - "I did pretty good on that run"

Mustang driver - "somebody hold my beer, hey yaw, watch this!"

:bowrofl::bowrofl::bowrofl:

icormba 02-06-2016 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bshields22 (Post 3394895)
Damn son, where do you work lol? Majority cars at my work are Accords, Camry's, trucks and corollas, not Porsches, BMW's, Telsas and GTR's lol.

http://www.the370z.com/members/icorm...1-photo-op.jpg

http://www.the370z.com/members/icorm...6358-zandb.jpg

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirk McGurck (Post 3394957)
icormba works at Wealthy Businessmen, LLC.

"We" are "Inside" many things. And with the amount of hours I put in at work, I figure I probably make about $19.00 an hour. :bowrofl:

Added some price comparisons...
Quote:

Originally Posted by TBatt (Post 3403850)
I crunched some numbers just for my entertainment and thought I would share them with you.

370Z Nismo: Starts at $42,000 - $47,000
Displacement - 226 cubic inches
Horse Power - 350
= 1.55 HP/CI
Weight 3232 (?)
= 9.23 Lb/HP
Skid pad pulls .99G depending on what year you're looking at? I picked the best one.

2015 Mustang GT 5.0: Added Performance Package is a MUST: Starts at $36,000-$41,000 (<41k if you want Recaro's)
Displacement - 302 cubic inches
Horse Power - 435
= 1.44 HP/CI
Weight - 3810 Lb
= 8.75 Lb/HP
Skid pad pulls .95G

However....
Shelby GT350: Starts at $48,000 - $58,000
Displacement - ~305 cubic inches
Horse Power - 526 ~101 hp per liter
Weight - ~3780 Lb
Skid pad pulls 1.00G

Performance advantage goes to the Mustang until you reach a corner. The lighter weight of the Z will give it a handling advantage. YMMV

I didn't include the GT350R because it's out of price range for all 3 here and very hard to get, unless you are Jay Leno and a couple other guys I know.

Don't get me wrong, I am and always will be a Z guy... but these American cars aren't "just" muscle anymore.

Duc_Z09 02-06-2016 11:21 PM

That flat-plane 5.2 is amazing... I wish Nissan would get their $h*t together like Ford has finally done. Can you imagine what would happen if you threw boost at that monster?:eek:

Ford Releases Final Details On The GT350's Insane 5.2-Liter Engine


Think they'll make a swap kit for the Z anytime soon?:bowrofl:

icormba 02-07-2016 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Duc_Z09 (Post 3406679)
That flat-plane 5.2 is amazing... I wish Nissan would get their $h*t together like Ford has finally done. Can you imagine what would happen if you threw boost at that monster?:eek:

Ford Releases Final Details On The GT350's Insane 5.2-Liter Engine


Think they'll make a swap kit for the Z anytime soon?:bowrofl:

Hennessey Performance | 2016 Ford Mustang Shelby GT350 HPE800 Supercharged Upgrade

And Lethal Performance slapped a SC on a 5.0 Coyote and ran 1/4 in 9sec.

But I'm not interested in that... it's about going around a track with twists and turns. :happydance: Adding weight to the front end screws that up.

It always seems to be a cycle... starts with the Europeans, then the Japanese, until the Americans catch up. Right now it's the Americans. Everyone else needs to start again. It will happen... I think the Europeans will start with an affordable v6 with electric motor assist. Then the Japanese, hopefully Nissan, which leaves the Americans trying to play catch-up again. Over and Over... we get to reap the rewards!

Spooler 02-07-2016 01:18 AM

I just want a raw driver car. The only thing like a Z is a Porsche Cayman. Nismo compares to a Cayman GT4. Personally, I hate the nanny gadgets on the Z. Traction control and the stupid stability control suck. I don't need the syncro rev match either. I can heal/toe just fine without it. Just my .02.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2