![]() |
Originally Posted by ZMan8 Basically my take is when the Z came out in 2009 it was faster than most if not all cars in that price range. Really the
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
![]() Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: N/A
Posts: 76,801
Drives: N/A
Rep Power: 141521 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() my Z can still get me in trouble in 5sec so i dont see the car as being too slow. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) |
Enthusiast Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 258
Drives: 2013 370Z
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
![]()
I don't see how anyone can call the 370Z "slow" in any event - 0-60 in 4.8 and 13.4 @ 105.6 stock. Add a CAI and catback plus a tune and you could be looking at 13 flat or high 12s.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: fl
Posts: 1,372
Drives: 14 3.8 Gen Coupe GT
Rep Power: 14034 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Theres this guy, his Handle is Veetec on the 350 forums who ran an HR...stock at 13.1 @107mph.
__________________
'14 3.8 Genesis Coupe, '13 Volvo S60, '04 Honda Accord, '13 370Z-sold, '05 350Z Touring-sold, '92 300Z Twin Turbo-sold, '82 280ZX-gone, '79 260Z-gone |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Koni at comparable stock setting? | victorofhavoc | Brakes & Suspension | 12 | 03-06-2015 09:38 PM |
slower and slower cranking up times | shfeddy | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 4 | 08-15-2014 01:56 PM |
[WTB] Stock Rear Tires or Comparable | NoVaZ | Parts for sale (Private Classifieds) | 1 | 06-21-2013 10:20 AM |
Seems slower - is it in my mind? | intrigue | Intake/Exhaust | 19 | 04-03-2012 03:23 PM |