![]() |
Basically my take is when the Z came out in 2009 it was faster than most if not all cars in that price range. Really the Z competed against the
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 (permalink) |
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,844
Drives: 10 370z 40th M6
Rep Power: 659 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Basically my take is when the Z came out in 2009 it was faster than most if not all cars in that price range. Really the Z competed against the Porsche Boxster and Cayman. (poor man's Porsche)
Since then, the genesis, mustang, and camaro have been upgraded at least once if not twice. The Z meanwhile was only upgraded aesthetically. I assume the Z35 will return to the top or near the top, unless they go for a lighter weight car with less power.
__________________
2010 370Z 40 Anniv., 6 MT | Fast Intentions | Swift Springs | SPC | Z1Motorsports | JWM | Redline Oils | 35% Window Tint 2015 Mazda6 | 370ZChicago: Chicago Area Cars & Coffee |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Koni at comparable stock setting? | victorofhavoc | Brakes & Suspension | 12 | 03-06-2015 09:38 PM |
slower and slower cranking up times | shfeddy | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 4 | 08-15-2014 01:56 PM |
[WTB] Stock Rear Tires or Comparable | NoVaZ | Parts for sale (Private Classifieds) | 1 | 06-21-2013 10:20 AM |
Seems slower - is it in my mind? | intrigue | Intake/Exhaust | 19 | 04-03-2012 03:23 PM |