05-14-2015, 12:03 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Some Place Cold
Posts: 16,053
Drives: In Circles
Rep Power: 2684396
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenchan
i thought cvt's were more fuel efficient than MT's?
as far as performance advantage, for the junk AT's they put in cheap cars that is probably true. cant be said for higher end cars if you look at the numbers.
MT is to excite driving pleasure, that's about all that it's good for these days and most people can careless about cars in general besides how they look and which emblems they wear.
|
I think it was Jalopnik, but someone stated an article saying AT cars were beating MT in terms of mpg. Same with CVT's.
That soccer mom only cares about doing her makeup while holding her grande latte and talking on her phone about that witch Tanya who stole Jakes BF from The Real Housewives of Miami. 
__________________
I AM FLOOF! SOMEBODY FLOOF MY HORN!! ALL HAIL THE FLOOF!!I JUST FLOOFED ON THE FLOOR
|
|
|
Similar Threads
47Likes
Hybrid Mode
