theDreamer's Z

Robert_K

Actually I think with the Monoflex the rears become a true coil-over.

__________________
'12 G37S Forgeline, '03 Built TT 350Z HRE (Sold!)
http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m...psc7a6dc53.jpg

Red__Zed

Mount is still wrong for the rear, assuming it drops in where the damper was before

wstar

Is that even possible?

__________________
7AT Track Car!
Journal thread / Car setup details

Robert_K

It's been awhile since I done some hard research. But I thought there was a set of coil-overs that removed the solo rear spring and placed it on the damper for a true coil-over in the rear. I could be wrong.

__________________
'12 G37S Forgeline, '03 Built TT 350Z HRE (Sold!)
http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m...psc7a6dc53.jpg

O&G

I've seen it on a G35, you can remove the spring seat as well, never drove it so not sure on any difference in handling.

__________________
O&G's Build/Journal <---(1st lowmount single turbo treeseventy)
Built Engine Thread
2011 F-250 Build/Journal

Red__Zed

Yep. You've generally got to do crazy things with the spring rate though.

ChrisSlicks

Actually the spring rate will be lower than what it would be in the stock position as the lower control arm has a lever action, approximately times 2 (halfway between pivot point and shock mount).

__________________
Hotchkis ARB | Stillen CAI | Art Pipes | Berk CBE | Stillen AP Racing Brakes | AE Performance Oil Cooler | BC Racing ER Coilovers | Doran Control Arms

Red__Zed

Right, which often gives you funky behavior and some suspension tuning oddities (especially if you run a progressive spring)