![]() |
sig?
|
Quote:
I know the Kahr CM/PM series will fit right in your pocket, and yes, I've heard of the feeding issues but in my research it seems like they all get resolved with a 200+ round break-in or being returned to Kahr for service. I did a lot of research with these because I was going to buy a CW9 before I ultimately chose the G26. Of course the LCP would fit no problem. Or even a Sig P238 if I wanted to get all fancy. |
Any of you guys shoot Saiga AK-12s?
|
No, but I would like to!
|
Quote:
http://SSEquine.net/pps5.jpg In the 9mm category, I ruled out the PM9 and the LC9 for reliability reasons. I gave a little bit up in size for the PPS, but no regrets. PPS vs LC9 http://SSEquine.net/pps2.jpg PPS, LC9, PM9 http://SSEquine.net/pps3.jpg http://SSEquine.net/pps4.jpg |
Very cool. Thanks for the info. My boss is actually looking for a carry gun right now and I told him to look at the PPS in addition to the standard Glock, XD, and M&Ps. It looks like a nice gun.
In other news, I've found that I am indeed allowed to keep a weapon in my car in the parking lot at work, so I need to work a bit on keeping it as secure as possible. I'll keep it easily accessable while driving and stowe it away securely when I make it to the office. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The Glock is very compact length and height wise but it's double-stack design still makes it pretty bulky, which can be annoying in the summer. Right now I am looking for something that I can keep in a pocket holster for summer, and use the Glock mostly in the spring/fall/winter. I'm looking hard at the Kahr CM9 because I really would like to stay with the 9mm round and that one seems like it would fit the bill -- but I know it'd require at least 200 flawless rounds to ensure it's reliability. |
Quote:
Smith & Wesson M&P340 with Galco IWB http://i765.photobucket.com/albums/x...Z/DSC00237.jpg |
I'm not really a bit revolver fan.
|
Has anyone seen this yet?
Get it while you can before the commies ban this |
Quote:
The general idea with bump-firing a regular AR-15 is you want to leave a small gap between the stock and your shoulder, mostly support the weight with your left hand on the handguard (or forward vertical grip), keep your trigger finger at fixed location in space, and let the recoil of each shot bounce the rifle off of your shoulder and back into your trigger finger. Some people find it easier to start out this way: Start with the butt against your shoulder and your finger on or just in front of the trigger, and then use your left hand (on the handguard / front grip) to pull the rifle forward into the trigger and away from your shoulder to fire the first round (at which point the same cycle happens as above). |
Yeah but with this stock it makes bump firing so much more easier especially with a 100 round drum :tup:
http://i765.photobucket.com/albums/x...Z/DSC00238.jpg http://i765.photobucket.com/albums/x...Z/DSC00239.jpg http://i765.photobucket.com/albums/x...Z/DSC00241.jpg http://i765.photobucket.com/albums/x...DSC00240-1.jpg |
Quote:
100-round mag dumps. Looks like a great way to ruin a good barrel much faster. Each to their own....I think I'll stick with semi auto. |
Quote:
But when it comes down to it, full auto isn't all that useful in any scenario I'm ever likely to encounter. Generally it's only tactically practical for laying down suppressive fire, and I just don't see myself ever needing to cover someone with suppressive full auto fire in any defensive situation I'm likely to run into, even if the zombies do come. If they were cheap, I'd buy full autos for range toys (and still not use them for defensive rifles). But at post-1986 prices, forget it, I'll stick with semis at the range too. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:19 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2