![]() |
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk |
This is good news. :tup:
|
What. The. Actual. ****.
Binger: "You lose the right to self-defense when you're the one who brought the gun." |
Quote:
What the hell does he want him to do? Write him love letters. :facepalm: |
Quote:
I don’t know about you guys but in self defense situations I was told you better have the bigger stick and know how to use it. AND, just because some one doesn’t have a gun doesn’t mean they’re not dangerous. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Well I am to old to care. You come at me with the intent to cause me harm in that way, well the outcome for the attacker may be fatal. Better to be tried by 12 than carried by 6! Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk |
1 Attachment(s)
|
..................and he's pointing it at the jury......:shakes head:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Not to mention that with no sights, that rifle won't be very accurate.... :ugh2: |
Was there an armorer present that handed him the gun after all the proper safety checks?
|
Quote:
There are theories out there saying that he did that on purpose trying to get a response out of the defense. Remember the prosecution was making a big deal out of Rittenhouse pointing his gun at people. Imagine this, the defense objects and the Little Dinger says something like I'm just doing what your client did the night in question. I wouldn't be surprised if that was his goal but I'm definitely not ruling out that he is a moron. |
Quote:
BTW I'm surprised that the armorer didn't lock back the bolt. I would have. |
Quote:
It passed the House yesterday. :tup: But Dumb CHIT Wolf said that he will veto it. :mad: Can't wait for '22 for when his term is over. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:56 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2