good times indeed.

:mad:

Added a few more photos to the album if anyone wants to look. Seriously let me know what you think because I'm debating on keeping this lens I was testing. It was affordable enough but I'm not happy with the straight out of camera images. They needed a decent amount of editing.

https://tlphoto.smugmug.com/Red-Bull...-the-Americas/

I didn't know you were gay. Sorry dudet.

I think they look good. :tup: I am not a photographer and have no idea what to look for in your lens though. :ugh2: I like this pic cause it shows close racing/action and is framed well.
https://tlphoto.smugmug.com/Red-Bull...as/i-P49dc3L/A

I don't know anything about photography, but I had noticed that these pictures had better quality than those you had posted before & I thought that when I first saw them, before you mentioned you had a different lens :tup:

:mad::mad::mad::mad:

im tired duuuudes...:yawn:

:mad:

They look rather professional to me. What sort of editing was required?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

That's kind of sad to me lol. The most recent stuff prior to this album was done with the Canon 70-200 2.8 which is one of the highest rated lenses by professionals. :eek:

A lot of shadow and exposure correcting. And it didn't feel as sharp as the 70-200 that I have. This one is a 70-300 f4-5.6.

So a good indicator would be to compare this album to the Indycar race day; qualifying album and Indycar practice car photos. Which look better?

good night itches.

Classic.

:owned:

:inoutroflpuke:

He put smiley faces after I called him Dudet. What was I supposed to think?

To these old, tired eyes, the motogp look better to me.

Hmmm. :confused:

The price of pork bellies is going up. :tiphat: