![]() |
Quote:
|
Im in the garage right now using my cell, i will make it short.
I think understand what you just explained but I wouldnt put a bigger maf tube (2.75 OD) than what your intake is. It would just transfer the bottleneck somewhere elese and causing some intake resonance because of the relatively big gap of your last bottom picture. IMO, your maf tube should be flowing slightly better than your TB. And from your maf to your intake manifold should either be the same or bigger than the flowing capability of your MAF tube. which help with throttle reponse if its a bit bigger |
I would think with the intake you would want to have the largest ID at the filter and the smallest at the TB. That way you can increase the velocity of the air flow into the manifold. If you have restricted sections (by the MAFs) you will be creating a vacuum that prevents the maximum amount of air from flowing.
So I would think you want something like 2.75" - 2.5" - 2.35". |
Quote:
If your pre-throttle tube is smaller than the Tb itself and the Maf . You are killing the throttle respond which for an N/a setup isnt something you want. But I totaly agree from the filter up to the entry of the maf tube. Should be bigger this is what was done on my custom cai... starting from 3" down to 63.5mm. |
Quote:
|
Ok I did a little research.
The TB lip is 2.81" at its largest. That tells me the Z1 post tube is around that size ID since it has to slip over it. Now its not hard to slip over but it's also not that easy. So I'm going to guess the several inches of the z1 post tube is around 2.7ish inch ID. http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e1...ps387aa232.jpg Now the OEM MAF section is only 2.54" OD which is why you see a bulge. The post tube is being forced into a smaller size. The silver pipe is 2.5" OD with the same ID of the OEM MAF tube. So forget all pipe before that, I'm running about a foot of 2.35" ID pipe with the MAF sensor in it that then opens up into the post tube that's 2.7ish ID that then goes down into 2.6" (TB opening lip) then 2.48" (right at the butterfly plate and port matched into the manifold) of the TB. http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e1...ps578ca956.jpg So if I at least replaced the foot of 2.35" ID silver pipe and OEM MAF section with 2.75" OD pipe, not only would it fit pretty well into the z1 post tube but it'd also lower the huge gap (2.35" to 2.7ish" now, to 2.63" to 2.7ish) I have right now. |
Any updates?
|
you need custom 2.75" intakes asap, the MAF housing will be your big restriction.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
I do, and I know it's retarded cheap... But you can't NOT pay the park up... So... Just gotta bite that pillow and bend over. |
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
25, that's awesome! |
That's sucks about your tuner good luck with it, I did see a few 2.75 slip in Maf housings but I don't remember any weld in tubes
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2