Nissan 370Z Forum  

Is it really worth putting a Cold Air Intake on 370z and what HP gains

Originally Posted by gsxr750 Turbo's work great when new, but after the mileage gets past 50K, they usually need replacement, due to impeller or bearing problems and even carbon build

Go Back   Nissan 370Z Forum > Nissan 370Z Tech Area > Engine & Drivetrain > Intake/Exhaust


Like Tree34Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-26-2012, 05:44 PM   #1 (permalink)
Base Member
 
Threadlocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 74
Drives: 2010 Nismo #169
Rep Power: 14
Threadlocker is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gsxr750 View Post
Turbo's work great when new, but after the mileage gets past 50K, they usually need replacement, due to impeller or bearing problems and even carbon build up.

They also put a lot of stress on the motor, they are good for racing apllications , but not that good for driving your car to high mileage standards.

I had an older 85 z turbo that had the turbo replaced 3 times in 40K miles, according to the original owners reciepts. I drove for about 10k and sold it.
Better to go with CUBIC INCHES or Stroking a motor as compared to turbo etc.
I had a 1983 280zx turbo that never had turbo problems. Ran for 243k, 100k was spent at 8PSI on the stock turbo (Garret TB03) with intake (K&N custom CAI) and exhaust (custom DP-back 3" mandrel bent).

I had a 1988 Toyota Supra Turbo with 212k when I sold her after running 70k on the stock CT-26 turbo at 12-13psi. K&N cone intake, Lexus MAF, 3" mandrel bent DP-back. I never had any turbo problems and the most extensive repairs I ever did on the car was replacing the headgasket on the 7mgte.

I don't believe the reliability or the longevity of the motors of these vehicles were compromised by the K&N filter or modifying the turbos. Both of those cars were overboosted and ran that way for over 50k. If there was a drop in power, it's possible I didn't feel it, but the track numbers didn't change, and they certainly didn't get replaced.

And just for an apples to apples story - my brother had a 1986 300zx turbo - he ran it with K&N/Exaust under ~9psi (T3) for about 5 years before he wrecked it. Yes, the turbo was salvagable.

When you talk about "turbos", which turbos are you talking about and for what engines? How much psi? Nothing you said about turbos reflects my personal experience, nor did I get that impression from the people at zcar.com or supraforums.com who also do turbo builds. Where is all this coming from?
__________________
Not the alpha male, go ask someone else.
Threadlocker is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cold Air Intake HP Debate - Is it worth it ? hedly Intake/Exhaust 77 11-02-2014 02:56 PM
AEM 370z Cold Air Intake System with ETI 370zNismo66 Parts for sale (Private Classifieds) 3 02-11-2011 10:54 PM
Worth putting my old ST40 332s on a new 370z? mswc Brakes & Suspension 2 12-09-2009 04:13 PM
370Z AEM cold air intake and Exhaust KenAEM Engine & Drivetrain 6 10-09-2009 10:51 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2