Sunoco 260 GT 100 octane = much better throttle response and power, read

'10Anamoly · 11-30-2011, 12:53 PM

So, I was curious about trying a little high octane gas in the car, after reading the timing maps for the 370 and thinking that it might allow for a bit better timing advance by the ECU (up to max programmed potential). I know some other world regions have higher than 93 octane recommended and I know that the 10% ethanol lowers the effective octane rating a bit from 93 to probably 91ish.

Long story short, I made the hike out to a Sunoco about 35 miles away and put in 6 gallons of Sunoco 260 GT 100 octane gas. Mixed with the rest of the tank filled at 93, its about a 95-95.5 octane total in the car now. The Sunoco 260 GT burns very close to the stoichiometric ratio that pump gas with 10% ethanol does (14.0 vs 14.9ish) so its a safe option. I read several reviews online of this specific gas being completely street legal, safe for street cars and mixable with pump gas without issues before I tried it. It is fully unleaded, has no metal compounds to mess up sensors/cats, etc. Downside is that it is $8.29 a gallon!

Driving impressions: To get a before and after, I drove the car nice and hard before adding any of the 100 octane. I also tested it out under part throttle to look for responsiveness/etc, heavy throttle, etc. All seemed like it always did.

Once I filled up with 6 gallons of 100 octane and the rest at 93, I drove for a bit and did honestly not notice any change for about 10-15 miles. I also did not see any difference under light throttle/etc at all.

HOWEVER, after about 20 minutes of driving, I went ahead and got on it a bit more. The car pulled a LOT more responsively under quick throttle jabs, like it had 10-12 lbs more torque in the lower rpm band. I figured it might be in my head so I found a nice clear area and let her loose. I was not wrong, the car reeled back through 1st, lost traction completely into 2nd with a bit of a slip to the right, 2nd pulled just as hard and I spun again a bit into 3rd. The car absolutely did NOT do this before the high octane gas was in. I was thoroughly impressed. Driving around normally again was not much different, although the car seemed to respond to throttle input right away now, instead of kinda chumming a bit before going as it did before when it was hot. Oil temps were at 210 as well when I got it on and was testing it (before and after the octane switch). I did another WOT run with the same results as the 1st, pulls harder and the throttle is immediate.

I'm obviously not going to keep the gas in there all the time, but I'll be putting a few gallons in every now and then because the car seems to really like the 95 octane-ish blend. I doubt it needs more than that if anything, perhaps it only needs a "true" 93 octane with no ethanol to run at its best. Either way, I think the blend I have in works about as good as it can.

DISCLAIMER: I dont care if you think it was a waste, I know my car and I wouldnt bs myself and spend $8.29 a gallon for nothing, I was actually expecting to be disappointed. Negative comments or "its all in your head" will be ignored.

If you dont agree, stick with your normal octane.

Abdiel · 11-30-2011, 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by '10Anamoly

I know that the 10% ethanol lowers the effective octane rating a bit from 93 to probably 91ish.

pretty sure blending in ethanol raises octane rating. ethanol is listed at 108 RON.

andre12031948 · 11-30-2011, 03:07 PM

sensitive

no comment.....

fuct · 11-30-2011, 04:49 PM

8.29... ouch

christian370z · 12-01-2011, 11:25 AM

These are my thoughts exactly. I filled my tank with 103 VP racing gas and 91 octane and instantly noticed an increase in engine responsiveness and while there were no gains in peak hp/tq, there was a solid gain in both in the mid-range.

Also, Seb at SpecialtyZ was talking to the Uprev guys and they say they found new timing maps that may give us much more control over timing which could further increase engine response and power gains.

Red__Zed · 12-01-2011, 11:31 AM

Did you data log at all to see if timing was actually being advanced?

'10Anamoly · 12-01-2011, 03:48 PM

I dont have a tuner, I looked at the maps while another guy was tuning one day and the advance seemed aggressive. This combined with the all controlling knock sensors being used heavily on these cars makes sense, so it safely makes as much power as possible while being flexible for regions with different octane availability.

Glad to hear that others are experiencing the same benefits. I felt the same thing, peak power didnt seem different, but the midrange thrust and throttle responsiveness was MUCH better. I dont doubt we are probably getting closer to or are actually reaching full timing advance.

DarkZide · 12-01-2011, 09:32 PM

Careful running too much of it if its leaded (although i dont think the sunoco 100 is). It will foul out O2 sensors, and sometimes mess with cats.

6MT · 12-01-2011, 09:37 PM

kewl!

'10Anamoly · 12-02-2011, 07:00 AM

The Sunoco 260 GT is completely unleaded and specifically states that it has no metallic compounds so it is safe for cats and 02 Sensors.

Dark Sarcasm · 12-02-2011, 05:59 PM

you lost me at $8.29 a gallon! haha

as far as the traction example, or lack of traction, after the Sunoco was added could be attributed to being on a different pavement. I know in my Z depending on what kind of surface I am on dictates how much wheel spin is generated.

im not saying your butt dyno isnt calibrated correctly, im just saying that pavement could be a contributing factor.

'10Anamoly · 12-02-2011, 07:14 PM

It aint the pavement

drove same roads both ways

christian370z · 12-03-2011, 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed

Did you data log at all to see if timing was actually being advanced?

I did, and it barely advanced.

cossie1600 · 12-03-2011, 08:30 PM

Placebo effect

'10Anamoly · 12-04-2011, 09:04 AM

I'll take more placebos then.

11-30-2011, 12:53 PM	#1 (permalink)
'10Anamoly Track Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: GA Posts: 882 Drives: 2010 370Z BS M6 Rep Power: 17	Sunoco 260 GT 100 octane = much better throttle response and power, read So, I was curious about trying a little high octane gas in the car, after reading the timing maps for the 370 and thinking that it might allow for a bit better timing advance by the ECU (up to max programmed potential). I know some other world regions have higher than 93 octane recommended and I know that the 10% ethanol lowers the effective octane rating a bit from 93 to probably 91ish. Long story short, I made the hike out to a Sunoco about 35 miles away and put in 6 gallons of Sunoco 260 GT 100 octane gas. Mixed with the rest of the tank filled at 93, its about a 95-95.5 octane total in the car now. The Sunoco 260 GT burns very close to the stoichiometric ratio that pump gas with 10% ethanol does (14.0 vs 14.9ish) so its a safe option. I read several reviews online of this specific gas being completely street legal, safe for street cars and mixable with pump gas without issues before I tried it. It is fully unleaded, has no metal compounds to mess up sensors/cats, etc. Downside is that it is $8.29 a gallon! Driving impressions: To get a before and after, I drove the car nice and hard before adding any of the 100 octane. I also tested it out under part throttle to look for responsiveness/etc, heavy throttle, etc. All seemed like it always did. Once I filled up with 6 gallons of 100 octane and the rest at 93, I drove for a bit and did honestly not notice any change for about 10-15 miles. I also did not see any difference under light throttle/etc at all. HOWEVER, after about 20 minutes of driving, I went ahead and got on it a bit more. The car pulled a LOT more responsively under quick throttle jabs, like it had 10-12 lbs more torque in the lower rpm band. I figured it might be in my head so I found a nice clear area and let her loose. I was not wrong, the car reeled back through 1st, lost traction completely into 2nd with a bit of a slip to the right, 2nd pulled just as hard and I spun again a bit into 3rd. The car absolutely did NOT do this before the high octane gas was in. I was thoroughly impressed. Driving around normally again was not much different, although the car seemed to respond to throttle input right away now, instead of kinda chumming a bit before going as it did before when it was hot. Oil temps were at 210 as well when I got it on and was testing it (before and after the octane switch). I did another WOT run with the same results as the 1st, pulls harder and the throttle is immediate. I'm obviously not going to keep the gas in there all the time, but I'll be putting a few gallons in every now and then because the car seems to really like the 95 octane-ish blend. I doubt it needs more than that if anything, perhaps it only needs a "true" 93 octane with no ethanol to run at its best. Either way, I think the blend I have in works about as good as it can. DISCLAIMER: I dont care if you think it was a waste, I know my car and I wouldnt bs myself and spend $8.29 a gallon for nothing, I was actually expecting to be disappointed. Negative comments or "its all in your head" will be ignored. If you dont agree, stick with your normal octane. __________________ 2013 Ford Mustang GT 374rwhp, 360rwtq SAE / GT500 Axle-Backs / Brembo Pack / Track Pack / Recaros / 6spd Last edited by '10Anamoly; 11-30-2011 at 12:58 PM.

12-01-2011, 11:25 AM	#5 (permalink)
christian370z A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Newport Beach Posts: 3,900 Drives: 2010 370Z/Saab 900se Rep Power: 433	These are my thoughts exactly. I filled my tank with 103 VP racing gas and 91 octane and instantly noticed an increase in engine responsiveness and while there were no gains in peak hp/tq, there was a solid gain in both in the mid-range. Also, Seb at SpecialtyZ was talking to the Uprev guys and they say they found new timing maps that may give us much more control over timing which could further increase engine response and power gains. __________________ -320whp / 259wftlbs- SP Rays -- RE-11s -- SpecialtyZ Tune -- Swift Springs -- Stillen 25R Oil Cooler -- Stillen G3 Intakes -- Berk HFCs -- F.I. 12" CBE -- Stillen Sway Bars -- Es14 Spring -- INGS+1 lip -- CF Spoiler -- GTR Start Button -- VLED Parking Lights -- PWJDM V2 shift knob

12-01-2011, 03:48 PM	#7 (permalink)
'10Anamoly Track Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: GA Posts: 882 Drives: 2010 370Z BS M6 Rep Power: 17	I dont have a tuner, I looked at the maps while another guy was tuning one day and the advance seemed aggressive. This combined with the all controlling knock sensors being used heavily on these cars makes sense, so it safely makes as much power as possible while being flexible for regions with different octane availability. Glad to hear that others are experiencing the same benefits. I felt the same thing, peak power didnt seem different, but the midrange thrust and throttle responsiveness was MUCH better. I dont doubt we are probably getting closer to or are actually reaching full timing advance. __________________ 2013 Ford Mustang GT 374rwhp, 360rwtq SAE / GT500 Axle-Backs / Brembo Pack / Track Pack / Recaros / 6spd Last edited by '10Anamoly; 12-01-2011 at 03:50 PM.

12-01-2011, 09:37 PM	#9 (permalink)
6MT A True Z Fanatic Join Date: May 2009 Location: ITU Zone 2 Posts: 22,459 Drives: Reliant Robin Rep Power: 1791	kewl! __________________ Andrew 2009 370Z Sport/Touring 6MT sold 2013 Honda Civic Si coupe D/D

12-02-2011, 07:00 AM	#10 (permalink)
'10Anamoly Track Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: GA Posts: 882 Drives: 2010 370Z BS M6 Rep Power: 17	The Sunoco 260 GT is completely unleaded and specifically states that it has no metallic compounds so it is safe for cats and 02 Sensors. __________________ 2013 Ford Mustang GT 374rwhp, 360rwtq SAE / GT500 Axle-Backs / Brembo Pack / Track Pack / Recaros / 6spd

11-30-2011, 03:07 PM	#3 (permalink)
andre12031948 Banned Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: monticello new york 127 Posts: 1,095 Drives: 08 350z black 6m/t Rep Power: 0	sensitive no comment.....

11-30-2011, 04:49 PM	#4 (permalink)
fuct A True Z Fanatic Join Date: May 2009 Location: Sugar Land Posts: 3,692 Drives: 97' Ranger :) Rep Power: 25	8.29... ouch

12-01-2011, 11:31 AM	#6 (permalink)
Red__Zed A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: window seat Posts: 28,940 Drives: Mostly on two wheels Rep Power: 121	Did you data log at all to see if timing was actually being advanced?

12-01-2011, 09:32 PM	#8 (permalink)
DarkZide Enthusiast Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: TN Posts: 291 Drives: 2010 370z BC M6 Rep Power: 16	Careful running too much of it if its leaded (although i dont think the sunoco 100 is). It will foul out O2 sensors, and sometimes mess with cats.

12-02-2011, 05:59 PM	#11 (permalink)
Dark Sarcasm Track Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Katy Texas Posts: 552 Drives: 11 CTS-V Coupe Rep Power: 16	you lost me at $8.29 a gallon! haha as far as the traction example, or lack of traction, after the Sunoco was added could be attributed to being on a different pavement. I know in my Z depending on what kind of surface I am on dictates how much wheel spin is generated. im not saying your butt dyno isnt calibrated correctly, im just saying that pavement could be a contributing factor. __________________ wax

12-02-2011, 07:14 PM	#12 (permalink)
'10Anamoly Track Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: GA Posts: 882 Drives: 2010 370Z BS M6 Rep Power: 17	It aint the pavement drove same roads both ways __________________ 2013 Ford Mustang GT 374rwhp, 360rwtq SAE / GT500 Axle-Backs / Brembo Pack / Track Pack / Recaros / 6spd

12-03-2011, 08:30 PM	#14 (permalink)
cossie1600 A True Z Fanatic Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: californee way Posts: 5,380 Drives: 370, Leaf Rep Power: 31	Placebo effect

12-04-2011, 09:04 AM	#15 (permalink)
'10Anamoly Track Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: GA Posts: 882 Drives: 2010 370Z BS M6 Rep Power: 17	I'll take more placebos then. __________________ 2013 Ford Mustang GT 374rwhp, 360rwtq SAE / GT500 Axle-Backs / Brembo Pack / Track Pack / Recaros / 6spd

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Loss in acceleration + throttle response ??	dlmartin81	Engine & Drivetrain	127	01-17-2017 10:04 AM
Throttle Response: DE/HR vs VHR	DIGItonium	Engine & Drivetrain	41	05-20-2012 07:11 PM
High Oil Temp = power + throttle response loss?	TARDCORE	Engine & Drivetrain	92	08-16-2011 03:10 PM
370Z FI Throttle Response: Boost vs. Throttle Position	DIGItonium	Forced Induction	9	01-23-2011 08:49 PM
Sunoco Octane 94	YamahaR6	Canada	6	08-04-2009 10:38 AM