|
I dont have a tuner, I looked at the maps while another guy was tuning one day and the advance seemed aggressive. This combined with the all controlling knock sensors
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-01-2011, 03:48 PM
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Track Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 882
Drives: 2010 370Z BS M6
Rep Power: 17  |
I dont have a tuner, I looked at the maps while another guy was tuning one day and the advance seemed aggressive. This combined with the all controlling knock sensors being used heavily on these cars makes sense, so it safely makes as much power as possible while being flexible for regions with different octane availability.
Glad to hear that others are experiencing the same benefits. I felt the same thing, peak power didnt seem different, but the midrange thrust and throttle responsiveness was MUCH better. I dont doubt we are probably getting closer to or are actually reaching full timing advance.
__________________
2013 Ford Mustang GT 374rwhp, 360rwtq SAE / GT500 Axle-Backs / Brembo Pack / Track Pack / Recaros / 6spd Last edited by '10Anamoly; 12-01-2011 at 03:50 PM. |
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Loss in acceleration + throttle response ?? | dlmartin81 | Engine & Drivetrain | 127 | 01-17-2017 10:04 AM |
| Throttle Response: DE/HR vs VHR | DIGItonium | Engine & Drivetrain | 41 | 05-20-2012 07:11 PM |
| High Oil Temp = power + throttle response loss? | TARDCORE | Engine & Drivetrain | 92 | 08-16-2011 03:10 PM |
| 370Z FI Throttle Response: Boost vs. Throttle Position | DIGItonium | Forced Induction | 9 | 01-23-2011 08:49 PM |
| Sunoco Octane 94 | YamahaR6 | Canada | 6 | 08-04-2009 10:38 AM |
Threaded Mode
