Jordo! |
04-03-2015 06:56 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulletz4break
(Post 3158020)
"Now in its sixth generation, Nissan’s iconic Z is a pleasing package of power and handling. It has one of the best V-6 engines in the business and a six-speed manual transmission with available rev-matching. The automatic, however, is not a willing partner in spirited driving, with slow shifts that detract from the fun." Quote from Car and Driver.
|
There's more to this...
Quote:
Originally Posted by C&D
Before we go on, we should note that, back in 2009, we tested a 370Z automatic and we didn’t hate it, calling its manual shifts “lightning-quick” and recording an even quicker zero-to-60 time than we did with the manual. But “lightning-quick” by 2009 standards is less so next to today’s intuitive and instantly responsive dual-clutchers.
|
From 2015 Nissan 370Z NISMO Automatic First Drive – Review – Car and Driver
In other words, personal preferences for a clutch pedal notwithstanding, they're arguing it isn't as quick as a PDK.
Ok... :ugh2:
Similarly, they make reference to the "...hero-making SyncroRev rev-matching technology ( which, of course, is defeatable for actual heroes)," indicating that only sopping wet, large labiaed vaginas would ever have the rev match turned on. Of course, those walking menstru-bots would at least secrete more testosterone than anyone with a quintessentially girly automatic.
Also, they claim a 0-60 for the Nismo 7AT of 4.6 (.1 sec faster than the 2009 auto, incidentally), but I didn't see a comparison with the MT, so... :confused:
Anyway, my guess is that even if they verified that the 7AT was faster than the 6MT, they would have made the same case in support of the MT because: Engaged; thing in hand; left foot moves. And so on.
|