![]() |
I have the JWT lightweight flywheel installed. While at idle it does produce some chatter and it's obvious enough that people have commented on it while standing next to the
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: So Cal baby!
Age: 53
Posts: 5,964
Drives: with passion
Rep Power: 323 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have the JWT lightweight flywheel installed. While at idle it does produce some chatter and it's obvious enough that people have commented on it while standing next to the car. I don't find it to be obtrusive or bothersome though some might. But my car is more purpose built.
A lightweight flywheel robs less power from the engine, as an engine accelerates through its rev range; a flywheel’s mass requires power to accelerate it to higher rpm. The stock flywheel weighs 32 lbs. My JWT flywheel is 16 lbs. A sizeable weight drop. It takes a bit more clutch slippage to get off the line smoothly but it's really not a substantial change. The JWT flywheel coupled with the JWT clutch and pressure plate yielded a gain of 6whp and 4ft. lbs. of torque on the dyno in my car. |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Flywheel/Clutch Upgrades | Straight6z | Engine & Drivetrain | 11 | 01-26-2010 07:29 PM |
| Lighter flywheel=SRM issues. | Red370 | Engine & Drivetrain | 7 | 09-04-2009 09:22 AM |
| New flywheel + clutch? | miguez | Engine & Drivetrain | 21 | 05-29-2009 11:03 PM |
| Silly question (flywheel) | KillerBee370 | Engine & Drivetrain | 2 | 04-16-2009 09:33 PM |