Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Engine & Drivetrain (http://www.the370z.com/engine-drivetrain/)
-   -   Hi rpm oil starvation (http://www.the370z.com/engine-drivetrain/100639-hi-rpm-oil-starvation.html)

BGTV8 02-10-2015 07:49 PM

This is why the Grand Am race teams went dry sump - the NISMO oil pumps gears are just a better steel - they just tolerate the harmonics for longer, but are still subject to failure under sustained rpm >8500. The only place for definitive information will be Doran Racing or NISMO Japan and the key is getting the information - they are usually reluctant to provide information to other than race teams.

This is not a "road-user" issue, but a "race" issue. Since my engine is ultimately destined for a race series where 1-hour and 3-hour races are the norm, I am vitally interested in oil pump reliability and I am happy to contemplate dry-sump from the get-go as a consequence.

Ross Performance in Albury, NSW (see here :| Ross Performance Engine Parts - Metal Jacket - ROSS Tuffbond Harmonic Balancers - Crankshaft Damper - ROSS Performance Parts |: and follow links for dry-sump/oil pump drives) are working on an external oil pump (Gilmer belt drive) for the VQ/HR as well as an "affordable" dry-sump kit (by comparison to the Dailey Engineering "gold-standard" - it won't be "cheap").


Quote:

Originally Posted by phunk (Post 3107969)
I wish there was some solid information on the NISMO pump. Last I heard, the nismo DE/revup pumps grenade just the same with increased RPM. Havent heard any first hand information on the HR/VHR versions but I assume its the same case.


phunk 02-10-2015 07:53 PM

I would be happy with 8200 or so regular use.

I have played a lot with the idea of getting a GT-R oil pump in here, even bought the pump... But it would require quite a bit of custom work and I am not sure I have the time for it. If the NISMO pump is good for 8200 I am all over it and that is good enough for a powerhouse straight-line engine. Otherwise I dont think I would take a stock pump past 7800.

FL 4Motion 02-10-2015 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phunk (Post 3108028)
I would be happy with 8200 or so regular use.

I have played a lot with the idea of getting a GT-R oil pump in here, even bought the pump... But it would require quite a bit of custom work and I am not sure I have the time for it. If the NISMO pump is good for 8200 I am all over it and that is good enough for a powerhouse straight-line engine. Otherwise I dont think I would take a stock pump past 7800.

My whole reasoning for wanting to get the nismo oil pump is b/c i want to build a moderate n/a car with all available mods along with a raised redline of 7800 -7900 rpm and have it be reliable as if stock. Were i wanting 8k rpm +, i would be looking into dry sump but honestly, for a noncompetitive track car, its just not worth it so nismo oil pump, baffled pan (eventually) or worst case spacer and just under 8k rpm limit and try to max out power with those constraints.

Btw, last nismo was tracked reg for 3 years with a 7900rpm redline, stock oil pump no issues.

jrb55gh 02-11-2015 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phunk (Post 3106620)
LOL I dont really need the pan in my hand, I can just as easily get the bolt pattern and flange off my Z. Its only a nights work of CAD. But I am curious about the hinge system for the baffles. IMHO its very important that it be a reliable system that remains active. If it ever seized up, its going to be bad news by drying out that pickup in short order. Rather than wing it as a first-timer in active oil pan baffling, I would like to at least examine how others have done it first.

Simple 2D billet parts like that are by far the easiest products to get from concept to reality. I dont have enough of those. Do we know for sure nobody else is going to sell that pan? I dont want to step on anyone's toes.

Any more thoughts on when you might have a production oil pan available?

phunk 02-12-2015 09:20 AM

I am going to order some billet material for other production today or tomorrow. I just ran out under my Z and measured 14x8x2.5 would be large enough to just barely stay above the crossmember. I will get some bricks on the way for it. Maybe try and push through a quick batch of 7-8 and see how it goes.

jwick 02-12-2015 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phunk (Post 3109635)
I am going to order some billet material for other production today or tomorrow. I just ran out under my Z and measured 14x8x2.5 would be large enough to just barely stay above the crossmember. I will get some bricks on the way for it. Maybe try and push through a quick batch of 7-8 and see how it goes.

If you are measuring the cross member clearance, would I be wrong in assuming that it will increase oil capacity or does the active baffle system eliminate the increased depth?

phunk 02-12-2015 11:18 AM

I dont have a stock pan anymore to measure its depth, but I doubt it goes down 2.5"... so we would be increasing capacity a little bit I believe. The baffle system will no-doubt consume some of the added volume.

Rusty 02-12-2015 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phunk (Post 3109635)
I am going to order some billet material for other production today or tomorrow. I just ran out under my Z and measured 14x8x2.5 would be large enough to just barely stay above the crossmember. I will get some bricks on the way for it. Maybe try and push through a quick batch of 7-8 and see how it goes.

Do you need mine for a mock up? :tiphat:

phunk 02-12-2015 01:33 PM

Well... if you arent using the car it sure wouldnt hurt. But I would never ask you to make the car immobile if its otherwise all together and running! I might be able to find some more detailed pictures with what I am looking for. I remember there being a lot of posts about that pan back when it came out.

Rusty 02-12-2015 01:37 PM

I still have my stock pan and spacer to use.

On another note. The AM Perf oil pan uses a modded stock pick-up tube. It's cut and rewelded at a different angle.

phunk 02-12-2015 04:06 PM

thats odd about the pickup tube... i dont see any reason to change that. I know guys have to change it to use with the ATI damper with the dry sumps I think, but just for that lower pan its not really in the way at all.

Rusty 02-12-2015 04:14 PM

1 Attachment(s)
The way it's angled to go through the top of the baffle.

phunk 02-12-2015 04:25 PM

might have been an afterthought? we can easily just leave a pass through for it.

jrb55gh 02-13-2015 06:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phunk (Post 3109760)
I dont have a stock pan anymore to measure its depth, but I doubt it goes down 2.5"... so we would be increasing capacity a little bit I believe. The baffle system will no-doubt consume some of the added volume.

Here is a link to a thread that has pictures of pan depth measurements:

http://www.the370z.com/engine-drivet...ml#post2417562

phunk 02-13-2015 12:36 PM

Here is the original AM Performance thread.

http://www.the370z.com/track-autocro...-oil-pans.html

I can see how their baffles are constructed. I have glanced around trying to find the doors/flaps in my supply catalogs but havent found anything yet. Might have to make the flaps. It looks like they might have. They appear to be aluminum. Wouldnt be too big of a deal to make them but to find them for $5 each in a catalog sure would be nice.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2