View Single Post
Old 08-27-2011, 05:27 PM   #32 (permalink)
MacCool
A True Z Fanatic
 
MacCool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,349
Drives: 370Z PW 2014
Rep Power: 16
MacCool has a spectacular aura aboutMacCool has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spearfish25 View Post
It's illegal to signal a speedtrap, but a ticket for doing it would never hold up in court. They'd never be able to prove why you flashed your lights and you can tell them any reason you choose. 'I knew the oncoming driver and was saying hello'. 'I was trying to activate the turn signal and must have pulled the stalk a little.'. 'An oncoming driver had his brights on an I was signalling him to turn them off.'. The possibilities are endless.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacCool View Post
Generally, I would prefer to not lie under oath.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemers View Post
Entering a plea on not guilty and not making any statement is not lying under oath.

I agree, but that's not what he said.

But you're right. If you go to court having plead not guilty, your attorney (or you if you are acting as attorney pro se) on cross examination will ask the cop to prove that you were flashing to circumvent the law. He won't be able to. You'll ask him, "officer, is it possible that I was flashing because I missed the turn signal, etc etc etc" and he'll say yes. But let's look at the practicalities. When it's time for the defense, (you), to present your case...what are you going to do? Call yourself as a witness? No, you wouldn't want to do that because your choices then are going to be either lying under oath or keeping silent. You can keep silent, but in traffic court (rather informal), I'm pretty sure the judge is going to ask you why you flashed your lights. Your choices now are lying under oath, or pleading the fifth amendment. Not good. If you do that, I suspect that most judges are going to find for the prosecution and tell you they recommend you appeal if you disagree.

Smart move, if you decide to take such a case to court, would be to move for dismissal before presenting your case, asserting that the prosecution didn't prove its case. I'll bet the odds are no better than 50-50 that the judge would go for that.
MacCool is offline   Reply With Quote