Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Photography (http://www.the370z.com/photography/)
-   -   **Photography Chat** Version 1.0 (http://www.the370z.com/photography/26190-photography-chat-version-1-0-a.html)

BeachZTT 08-01-2011 08:05 PM

It's good stuff! I need to get back to shooting for myself a little. We have been so busy with client stuff... We have real jobs, the photography is our side gig.

Here is one of my favorite macro shots because I had no idea the spider was there until editing. And if you look closely, the dragonfly has been eating Cheetos. :tiphat:

http://www.the370z.com/members/beach...-dragonfly.jpg


http://www.the370z.com/members/beach...ous-spider.jpg

Nick911sc 08-01-2011 08:07 PM

Love the shot

I have been waiting forever to get a proper macro shot of a dragon fly

Photography is also one of my many hobbies lol

I sell insurance and the only photography involved in that is photo inspections with a POS point and shoot lol

BeachZTT 08-01-2011 08:29 PM

Thanks!

I hear ya! I am not permitted to have a camera anywhere near my day job. :)

Nitex 08-01-2011 08:38 PM

Beach and nick really good stuff guys! Haha the spider below the dragon fly is epic.

haha and im really just a few days into the whole thing. Ive owned decent cameras in the past but never really got into it.

Yeah some of the ferry shots had some noise, many of the close ups also. But im sure the canon 55-250 at full zoom will have some noise. Maybe it will improve when i have a tripod or better lens for such things :tup:

Nick911sc 08-01-2011 08:46 PM

I agree that a lot of shots (of mine) inherently have noise/grain in them. I usually take it out in light room.

And I noticed that shot of the seagull you posted, you were using your camera set at F/9. I wouldn't really use the 250mm end of the lens past 8 and the 50mm past 5.6. Those are the optimal F stops(for that specific lens) before you actually lose picture quality.

phelan 08-01-2011 08:52 PM

is there a list or general guideline for optimal or max f/stops you want to be looking at for lenses?

i guess my eyes aren't trained enough yet, i don't see a lot of noise in those pics. and mine have noise, but i usually go light on post processing so meh. it's all still a work in progress.

Nick911sc 08-01-2011 08:56 PM

Every lens is different, if you wanna be really anal about it you can look up specific MTF charts online that show the optimal F stop sharpness of a lens. But generally the rule of thumb is...Whatever the open F stop of a lens is add 2 to it and that should be around optimal.

obviously this rule doesn't work for everything. macro for instance needs a very high F stop to get a clear photo since you're focusing so close. But that's the rule I follow for most lenses and it generally works.


For example... My 1.8 prime would be optimal around 4.. etc

kenchan 08-01-2011 09:41 PM

wow nick! you da man. :tup: nice shots.

kenchan 08-01-2011 09:44 PM

beach- nice! that dragon fly has come nice colors... i lol'ed at spider. :D very impressive shots.

kenchan 08-01-2011 09:50 PM

kenchan's garage at night... :D

http://www.the370z.com/members/kench...-11-garage.jpg

http://www.the370z.com/members/kench...-workbench.jpg

http://www.the370z.com/members/kench...e-trashcan.jpg

kenchan 08-01-2011 10:35 PM

quick question for those of you who take picts of cars. where exactly are you placing the focal point? in my shots i want to get the entire car in focus so usually focus on the front fender just aft of the headlight and use f/10 or higher.

any recommendations? thanks! :D

phelan 08-01-2011 10:51 PM

Depends on the shot I want to take. Front three quarters if that makes sense I use the side marker and a high f stop.

Alchemy 08-01-2011 11:43 PM

My contribution for the day...
http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l265/avryan/flag.jpg

http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l2...ahamahouse.jpg

phelan 08-02-2011 12:38 AM

http://i1222.photobucket.com/albums/...4/DSC_0719.jpg

http://i1222.photobucket.com/albums/...4/DSC_0698.jpg

minor edits. can't get the bike one to not look faded. it looked okay on my LCD too. meh.

alchemy - beautiful flag silhouette shot.

Parkerman 08-02-2011 06:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kenchan (Post 1240764)
quick question for those of you who take picts of cars. where exactly are you placing the focal point? in my shots i want to get the entire car in focus so usually focus on the front fender just aft of the headlight and use f/10 or higher.

any recommendations? thanks! :D


How far away are you generally standing from the car?


http://www.parkerphotog.com/photos/i...-nXXcdrG-L.jpg

That is at 2.8 at 24mm... Standing roughly 10-15ft from the car I would say. Now it does change things a little when the car is more at an angle.

Here is a link to a larger version if you want to look a little closer.

http://www.parkerphotog.com/photos/i...nXXcdrG-X3.jpg



*edit*
I didn't actually make my point... haha. The further you stand back.. the more you can fit into your focal plane.

kenchan 08-02-2011 07:04 AM

Parker- thanks! Thats a nice shot. On the vw did u focus on the door where it meets the side window?

I'm usually standing about 15-20ft from my car using my kit lens at 22-35mm f8 or higher number.
if I was taking a pict like your sig pict ( your blue Z on an angle) where should I put focus?

When I stand too far back and zoom in, my car looks too flat in the picture like part of the background... I cant seem to get a good focus throughout the car. Is this me or limitation of my setup? :confused:

Nick911sc 08-02-2011 07:36 AM

22-35 on a crop sensor IMO isn't wide enough compared to a full framed camera. You just don't get that same effect with auto photography.

And i def wouldn't go any higher than F8.

Also, when you zoom it seems flat due to the same reason I suggest using a wider angle lens.

I'm no pro though just some of my observations

kenchan 08-02-2011 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nick911sc (Post 1241166)
22-35 on a crop sensor IMO isn't wide enough compared to a full framed camera. You just don't get that same effect with auto photography.

And i def wouldn't go any higher than F8.

Also, when you zoom it seems flat due to the same reason I suggest using a wider angle lens.

I'm no pro though just some of my observations

Nick- thanks for the response. So I need to study the difference between my camera and a full framed camera. If this is just the limitation of my camera im fine with it. I thought it was me doing something wrong. :p

So wat lens would u recommend for car shots? Basically im only going to be taking shots of my car and mods mostly. :D

Nick911sc 08-02-2011 08:45 AM

Well, if you want to get an idea of crop vs full frame think of it this way. Generally speaking the crop factor is 1.6 times. So if you're shooting with the canon kit lens at 18mm that would be equivalent to a full frame camera shooting at roughly 28mm. So the full frame gets a much wider shot than the crop camera without having to have a super wide lens in terms of the mm.

I own a tamron 17-50mm 2.8 and I love it to death as far as zooms go. Sharp as a tack.

But if I were you and I'm assuming you're using the 18-55 kit lens, I'd probably be shooting it at 18mm F/5.6 and then adjust the shot accordingly by moving backwards and forwards instead of zooming. Standing closer with a wider angle will get you way better pictures for cars than zooming into the car further back.

Nick911sc 08-02-2011 08:54 AM

I don't claim to be a pro at car photography, because to be honest it's one of the areas I spend the least amount of time. I took these at a local car show. I don't exactly remember the settings off the top of my head, but I'm sure they were at 17mm and F/4(wide open being 2.8). I just had them uploaded on facebook, straight out of camera with no editing, so a lot of the quality was sucked out of them by that god awful site.

https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net..._1514487_n.jpg

https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net..._3607983_n.jpg

https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net...4_565666_n.jpg

kenchan 08-02-2011 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nick911sc (Post 1241239)
Well, if you want to get an idea of crop vs full frame think of it this way. Generally speaking the crop factor is 1.6 times. So if you're shooting with the canon kit lens at 18mm that would be equivalent to a full frame camera shooting at roughly 28mm. So the full frame gets a much wider shot than the crop camera without having to have a super wide lens in terms of the mm.

I own a tamron 17-50mm 2.8 and I love it to death as far as zooms go. Sharp as a tack.

But if I were you and I'm assuming you're using the 18-55 kit lens, I'd probably be shooting it at 18mm F/5.6 and then adjust the shot accordingly by moving backwards and forwards instead of zooming. Standing closer with a wider angle will get you way better pictures for cars than zooming into the car further back.

thanks for the info... :tup: i think i need to study more about full frame lens. not that im going to be buying anything i just want to learn. :)

yah, i really like the 18-20mm but depending on how close i am to the car it would put too much emphasis on the center like a fisheye look. in some shots i prefer that, in some shots the image is too distorted as far as straight/veriticle lines.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Nick911sc (Post 1241252)
I don't claim to be a pro at car photography, because to be honest it's one of the areas I spend the least amount of time. I took these at a local car show. I don't exactly remember the settings off the top of my head, but I'm sure they were at 17mm and F/4(wide open being 2.8). I just had them uploaded on facebook, straight out of camera with no editing, so a lot of the quality was sucked out of them by that god awful site.

yah your shots with F/5.6 - 8 looks sharp. ive been real careful not to shake the camera but using a wider apeture (faster shutter) would net me less blurry images for sure... im trying to figure out if my apeture setting is causing my slight blurr or me shacking the camera. :icon17:

so my other question was about focus point. where exactly are you focusing on your car images at f/5.6-f/8? do you take the center plane of the car or do you aim at the headlights or middle of hood, or emblem, or ... (?) im a pretty confused kenchan.. :rolleyes:

Nick911sc 08-02-2011 09:47 AM

Aperture setting should have no variable in the photo being blurred, a wide open aperture takes in more light, so if anything it should be less blurry since you need a slower shutter speed. Rule of thumb is.. Whatever the mm you're shooting at should be your minimum shutter speed. So if you're shooting at 50mm your minimum shutter speed for a non blurry photo should be AT LEAST 1/50 and so on.(I usually end up doubling if I can)

In those photos I was using a center focusing point, when you're shooting at a higher F stop the sharpness starts at the middle and progressively gets sharper towards the edges as the f stop increases, so really the whole picture should be sharp with the center shot being the sharpest.

Placement in the photo I'd also would say has to do with your general composition that you're looking for the photo overall. Rule of thirds, etc.

Do you own an external flash for your camera?

kenchan 08-02-2011 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nick911sc (Post 1241338)
Aperture setting should have no variable in the photo being blurred, a wide open aperture takes in more light, so if anything it should be less blurry since you need a slower shutter speed. Rule of thumb is.. Whatever the mm you're shooting at should be your minimum shutter speed. So if you're shooting at 50mm your minimum shutter speed for a non blurry photo should be AT LEAST 1/50 and so on.(I usually end up doubling if I can)

In those photos I was using a center focusing point, when you're shooting at a higher F stop the sharpness starts at the middle and progressively gets sharper towards the edges as the f stop increases, so really the whole picture should be sharp with the center shot being the sharpest.

Placement in the photo I'd also would say has to do with your general composition that you're looking for the photo overall. Rule of thirds, etc.

Do you own an external flash for your camera?

Thanks again, nick. i really appreciate your help. :tup:

huh, i thought apeture would determine DOF so a higher number was preferred if i wanted to get a big object like an entire car in focus..(?) maybe im mis-understanding the depth of say f/5.6 with 20mm lens 3meters away would be 1.325m near focus limit... ohhh.... DOF is infinite. it's when im using more like 23mm+ i need to worry about the rear focal limit.

(kenchan using DofF calculator on his droidx... :icon17: )

so the shorter the lens the less i need to worry about DOF... ok ok.. thanks for that! :tup: i will shoot f/5.6-8 18mm-20mm from now on. :)

thanks for the focus point. im starting to understand this. so there's actually 2 areas the camera can focus on... DOF plane + within that plane, the actual focal point using the camera's artificial RED DOT focal point.

is that wat you're saying? :)

phelan 08-02-2011 10:05 AM

^ i was debating to myself for a bit to invest in an external flash or not. i've generally gone on the presumption to not use flash for anything yet, as i'm still learning the ropes, but i've taken more than one shot where i wish i could bounce some light off the ceiling or get some good fill.

and aperture does control DOF, ken. i think nick was pointing to that later in his post, as your f/stop increases, the sharpness also starts crawling out towards the edges.

Nick911sc 08-02-2011 10:10 AM

When you shoot wide open, you get more of a DOF so the center is in focus but as you move away from the center you begin to get out of focus. So if you're shooting wide open at say.. 1.8 as you move away from the center it will begin to lose sharpness and if something is further away you'll get the blurring(bokeh) in the photo. So if you take that same lens and boost the F/ to 4 more of the image will be in focus including things that may be further away from the focusing point. The mm of the lens itself does not really effect DOF. If you shoot at 90mm with 2.8(like my macro shots or at macro 1:1 with a higher F stop which is a totally different lesson lol) you're getting that same DOF effect.

IMO an external flash increases picture quality 10 fold. But natural light I find better obviously in situations like shooting cars.

Nitex 08-02-2011 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nick911sc (Post 1240533)
Every lens is different, if you wanna be really anal about it you can look up specific MTF charts online that show the optimal F stop sharpness of a lens. But generally the rule of thumb is...Whatever the open F stop of a lens is add 2 to it and that should be around optimal.

obviously this rule doesn't work for everything. macro for instance needs a very high F stop to get a clear photo since you're focusing so close. But that's the rule I follow for most lenses and it generally works.


For example... My 1.8 prime would be optimal around 4.. etc

Nick! great info ty for all the advice. I have a lot to learn it seems :tup:

Parkerman 08-02-2011 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nick911sc (Post 1241378)
When you shoot wide open, you get more of a DOF so the center is in focus but as you move away from the center you begin to get out of focus. So if you're shooting wide open at say.. 1.8 as you move away from the center it will begin to lose sharpness and if something is further away you'll get the blurring(bokeh) in the photo. So if you take that same lens and boost the F/ to 4 more of the image will be in focus including things that may be further away from the focusing point. The mm of the lens itself does not really effect DOF. If you shoot at 90mm with 2.8(like my macro shots or at macro 1:1 with a higher F stop which is a totally different lesson lol) you're getting that same DOF effect.

IMO an external flash increases picture quality 10 fold. But natural light I find better obviously in situations like shooting cars.



The focal length of a lens does effect its depth of field. 200mm at 2.8 will have a much shallower DoF than 24mm at 2.8.

Nick911sc 08-02-2011 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Parkerman (Post 1241412)
The focal length of a lens does effect its depth of field. 200mm at 2.8 will have a much shallower DoF than 24mm at 2.8.

Yea, I should have made it clear I was talking more about the kit lens and other similar lenses though. IMO 18mm, 50mm and even 90mm is way different compared to something as long as 200mm.

phelan 08-02-2011 10:36 AM

lol let's leave the telephoto lenses out of the discussion for now :rofl2:

kenchan 08-02-2011 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phelan (Post 1241368)
^ i was debating to myself for a bit to invest in an external flash or not. i've generally gone on the presumption to not use flash for anything yet, as i'm still learning the ropes, but i've taken more than one shot where i wish i could bounce some light off the ceiling or get some good fill.

and aperture does control DOF, ken. i think nick was pointing to that later in his post, as your f/stop increases, the sharpness also starts crawling out towards the edges.

hey phelan. yep, i understood that part and nick's explanation. what didnt' come to me was that up to about 20mm length the rear DOF is infinite vs using a longer lens based on the DofF calculator. which means i shouldn't need to use a large f/stop number to get the tail of my car in focus. :)

here's wat the calc says based on me standing 3meters from the car using f/5.6

18mm near focus limit 1.17m DOF: infinite /far focus limit is infinity
20mm near focus limit 1.33m DOF: intinite /far focus limit is infinity
23mm near focus limit 1.53m DOF: 65.18m /far focus limit is 66.72m

that's a lot of dept of field i can use at f/5.6 with a short lens.

on the contrary if i use a 55mm setting...
55mm near focus limit 2.56m DOF: 1.02m /far focus limit is 3.594m


Quote:

Originally Posted by Nick911sc (Post 1241378)
When you shoot wide open, you get more of a DOF so the center is in focus but as you move away from the center you begin to get out of focus. So if you're shooting wide open at say.. 1.8 as you move away from the center it will begin to lose sharpness and if something is further away you'll get the blurring(bokeh) in the photo. So if you take that same lens and boost the F/ to 4 more of the image will be in focus including things that may be further away from the focusing point. The mm of the lens itself does not really effect DOF. If you shoot at 90mm with 2.8(like my macro shots or at macro 1:1 with a higher F stop which is a totally different lesson lol) you're getting that same DOF effect.

IMO an external flash increases picture quality 10 fold. But natural light I find better obviously in situations like shooting cars.

yah, so you're saying that the camera's center is focus based on apeture and DOF and you can selectively focus using the REDDOT but the apeture setting will mandate how well the camera can focus within that DOF. i think i understand how this thing works now. :D

forgot to reply on your question about flash. i dont have external flash, just the one that pops up on my D3100.

i dont intend to go deep into photograpy. i already have another expensive hobby (music) besides my car which not only eats at my wallet but my time and determination as well. :D photography is more like just a icing on the cake for my car hobby. :p

phelan 08-02-2011 10:38 AM

i'm about ready to enroll myself in a photography class now :facepalm:

Parkerman 08-02-2011 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nick911sc (Post 1241414)
Yea, I should have made it clear I was talking more about the kit lens and other similar lenses though. IMO 18mm, 50mm and even 90mm is way different compared to something as long as 200mm.


It still makes a difference though, Just saying. Like 18 vs 55 at the same aperture, you will see a difference but not like you would with the comparison I made.

Nick911sc 08-02-2011 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kenchan (Post 1241419)
hey phelan. yep, i understood that part and nick's explanation. what didnt' come to me was that up to about 20mm length the rear DOF is infinite vs using a longer lens based on the DofF calculator. which means i shouldn't need to use a large f/stop number to get the tail of my car in focus. :)

here's wat the calc says based on me standing 3meters from the car using f/5.6

18mm near focus limit 1.17m DOF: infinite /far focus limit is infinity
20mm near focus limit 1.33m DOF: intinite /far focus limit is infinity
23mm near focus limit 1.53m DOF: 65.18m /far focus limit is 66.72m

that's a lot of dept of field i can use at f/5.6 with a short lens.

on the contrary if i use a 55mm setting...
55mm near focus limit 2.56m DOF: 1.02m /far focus limit is 3.594m




yah, so you're saying that the camera's center is focus based on apeture and DOF and you can selectively focus using the REDDOT but the apeture setting will mandate how well the camera can focus within that DOF. i think i understand how this thing works now. :D

forgot to reply on your question about flash. i dont have external flash, just the one that pops up on my D3100.

i dont intend to go deep into photograpy. i already have another expensive hobby (music) besides my car which not only eats at my wallet but my time and determination as well. :D photography is more like just a icing on the cake for my car hobby. :p

I also am very big into music. Fellow guitarist?

kenchan 08-02-2011 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phelan (Post 1241415)
lol let's leave the telephoto lenses out of the discussion for now :rofl2:

:icon18: yah, basics first.

remember now, kenchan did not know how to mount lens to body 3wks ago. :tup:

kenchan 08-02-2011 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nick911sc (Post 1241427)
I also am very big into music. Fellow guitarist?

cool! im a music composer (hobbiest) keyboards/piano. :)

i'll snap some shots later this week. :p

phelan 08-02-2011 10:58 AM

i was about to say how happy i was that my music hobby doesn't cost me anymore...i already have a piano / keyboard i love to use. but then ken goes and says he plays a keyboard / piano...:wtf:

Red__Zed 08-02-2011 11:00 AM

I recently bought a subaru by selling my leftover live sound equipment and some instruments. So i guess I'm kinda into music....


Sent from my iPhone

kenchan 08-02-2011 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by phelan (Post 1241458)
i was about to say how happy i was that my music hobby doesn't cost me anymore...i already have a piano / keyboard i love to use. but then ken goes and says he plays a keyboard / piano...:wtf:

:icon18: yah, but i dont currently own a real piano (my wife has 2 yamaha's but one is in japan, the other one is being sold this summer since i gave her a VPiano for xmas).

im into composition so digital piano (yami CP1) is the way i play... :) this will last me another 8yrs before i get me a new one and a RhodesMk7 88Active. :yum:


Quote:

Originally Posted by Red__Zed (Post 1241464)
I recently bought a subaru by selling my leftover live sound equipment and some instruments. So i guess I'm kinda into music....

Sent from my iPhone

nono, if you're selling your car to buy music gear then you're a member of the music hobbiest. you're going the wrong way. :D hahaha. ;)

Red__Zed 08-02-2011 11:27 AM

No, it's me moving away from sellout status :)


Sent from my iPhone

kenchan 08-02-2011 11:41 AM

Nick, another quick question for you...

tripods... what brand/model should i be looking to get? i have an old one wife and i bought for our video camera long time ago but im not sure how long this thing is going to hold.

i want to get a real short one for low-angle shots and a standard height. :)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2