Mustang? Looks like a Ford Fusion to me.

Uhm the Z just let him past, clearly. Why is this still a thing?

There was another thread where a few things he said pretty clearly identified him as JungleZ. I figure he's off his meds again. He admitted to being pretty seriously mentally ill before, a claim his behavior completely backs up. He'll be back with a new name soon enough.

https://cloud.real.com/s/EPQupT

I couldnt hook up with a GT but the 305hp v6 one had to do. It's an a$$ whoopin.

This was last night at San Antonio Raceway.

I'm not trying to start ****. Just thought Id share because my jaw dropped when I saw Th
is thread and read these times lol also. The cars in the video clearly let him pass.

The quite^ is wrong. you guys are just throwing out opinions. The new mustang get weighs 600 more lbs than our cars and makes 80-90 whp, and it's gear for acceleration. But has a low ratio in 6th to get the same gas mileage we get

The 5.0 beat our car around VIR over and over with no heating issues or anything. It's sad but it's true look at all the times found in car and driver. We got beat by lots of cars that cost the same price. Do I care? No lol but facts are facts

Mustang GT 5.0 3:08.6
2010 camaro SS 3:09
2007 335 coupe 3:10.5
2015 Wrx Sti 3:10.5
2009 370z nismo 3:12.0
2011 Mustang v6 3:12.5
2006 350z track 3:12.5
2008 Chevy cobalt SS 3:13.0
2010 mustang gt 3:13.3

I still like my 370z over all of these cars. However I drove a boss 302 and I've wanted to sell the Z for one ever since. Made my car feel like a fat slow turd :eekdance:

Research will also tell you they were having issues getting a clean lap on the Nismo before the wreak. Comparing MT times on MRLS between the new STI and the Nismo gives a better comparison time. It's not perfect, but if you look at the new STI time at VIR, it will be a good indicator of what the Nismo could have ran. No excuse for piss poor pads, fluid, and oil temps.

i agree but that was back in 2010. this was from the 2014 issue. didnt they being another nismo to get an official time?

Nope. Like I said, not a perfect comparison, but very very close.

Quoting any car magazine for fair and just test is like quoting Fox for real news. Just saying, whatever car supplier pays more money to the mag, will get the better reviews. We all know how Nissan feels about the Zed.

im sure nissan paid them to put the gtr that low as well lol are you in denial that bad?? have you raced a 5.0 or driven one. its not slower than the z or that much worse in the turns. it is what it is sir. if you just wanna haul *** then sure buy a mustang but i still pick the Z over anything. i paid 26k for a fairly new z with everything but leather, bose, and navi. The drive feels much better than anything else in that price range. The mustang SHOULD out perform it. its a modern v8 coupe with 90 more hp. at least we can keep up with a stock one and look better doing it IMO. but saying that mustang boys are just mad because they cant keep up in the turns is pure ********. those days are over and those ******** are beating us lmao

BHP aint nothing but a number.:roflpuke2:

I was going by dynijet numbers. My brother made 87 more hp on the same dyno... :tiphat:

Odd. I never see mustangs at any auto cross events. I wonder why? ?

I'm not a Mustang fan by any means, but the GT RTR and Shelby GT350 look very promising. Both are to debut in a few weeks.

I'm curious to see this new Z06 in person. Thing is stupid quick and kinda cheap for what it is.