![]() |
Gotcha.
I'd take a turbo 6 with 350+ over a v8 anyday Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And yea...I might not be getting one of the first ones with all this talk of 2016 having DI. :( And the weight loss talk is not dead. There's a 27 page discussion on that alone on mustang6g.com Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Vettes way 3400...
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk |
Quote:
A lot of people are concerned about the weight savings... where could you pull weight off the S197 chassis to drop the required 200+ lbs? They are forgetting that the S550 is an entirely new chassis developed for this car. There's over a decade's gap of technology between the two platforms. The only thing in common with the S197 is the wheel base. Everything else is brand new. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk |
I really really like it...
|
Quote:
|
:( that's what I heard sokewhere, but I thought they said 60 k for the blown v8. Was hoping less for the tt but not 15k
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk |
I really do like the 15 stang. I had been waiting for a while and hoping they went with a more modern look. I really really like the GT version. The base version is bland. but that is the way it should be.
|
Finally a Mustang that actually looks goods.
It looks more like a modern version of the early 2000 mustang gt style, the old retro look can only last so long before it becomes dated. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2