10-03-2013, 09:47 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
A True Z Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: N/A
Posts: 76,801
Drives: N/A
Rep Power: 141522
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waizzz
That's a great jump in hp from your intake
Given your CVT and the fact that you're down nearly 27 hp from the Fit your MPG difference to the Fit now makes sense
|
 nice improvement just by the intake. 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Z_ealot
isnt the 2009 and above fit sport rated at 117hp vs. the Note's 109hp? from what i've been able to dig up it seems like the actual whp from the fit and the note arent much different and are both very efficient at getting the power to the ground. the stock dyno plots i've been able to find for the fit show it at around 98 to 100whp vs. the Notes 93/94hp baseline pull, pretty awesome for both considering their rated crank HP is not much higher than that  does anyone know if there's any gains from throwing an axle back exhaust on the fit? |
the thing about the Fit for me is that mine is a 5MT and can accelerate to 60 under 8sec. that's plenty quick for a eco-hatch. my obc shows 30.6mpg on short surface roads trips with my spirited driving, so that's plenty for me. when i did a road trip it was up to 37mpg, nowhere near your 44+mpg, but im okay with it.
for me, i prefer the quickness vs squeezing out mpg. i really dont care about gas consumption at this level as it's regular gas and it doesn't cost that much to begin with. however, i would prefer the car had a larger tank so i dont have to fill as often.
|
|
|
Similar Threads
39Likes
Threaded Mode
