![]() |
Originally Posted by MZ DAIZY I’m guessing this is measured at the crank. If so that puts it at about 325 - 340 WHP. $4000 worth of bolt on’s with
|
|||||||
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Base Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 196
Drives: Q60 3.7 AWD
Rep Power: 6718 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
-The 400HP is underrated. RWD cars are getting very close to rated crank HP at the wheels, this is proven by years of dyno comparisons. (AWD Q60 weighing 600+ pounds more than this Z can get to 60 in 4.4!) -The VQ is a high-revving, moderate torque engine. It's actually better than most other NA designs, however the VQ is WAY down on OVERALL power. The torque from the VR30 is available from 1600-5600 revs, whereas what little torque the VQ makes is at a peak. The VR30 has a very broad power band, and makes more power all the time than a VQ. Also, think about driving at elevation, it'll be a revelation! -The VR can be tuned way further per $ than a VQ. JB4 piggyback will give you a very noticeable kick in the pants. VQs need an optimistic butt-dyno. -VR is smoother than VQ, which can seem agricultural (to me at least, but VQ exhaust sounds awesome) with the windows closed. The VR is not perfect, the VQ will likely beat it out for long term reliability since it's not boosted, but for enthusiasts it's a WAYYY better engine. |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Z1 400hp package RHD conversion | JacobRH | Australia/New Zealand | 5 | 07-01-2025 05:21 AM |
| 400hp and 88lbs | ChaseZ | Engine & Drivetrain | 8 | 12-16-2016 02:06 PM |
| 400HP Buick Avista | LAVA | Other Vehicles | 23 | 01-13-2016 05:44 PM |
| VQ37VHR 400HP Package BF | jlo370z | Z1 Motorsports | 94 | 01-25-2014 12:16 PM |
| One Properly Executed 400hp 1993 FD RX-7 | Waiz | Other Vehicles | 18 | 09-01-2011 03:53 PM |