![]() |
370z powerband vs. 350z powerband
how does the 370z powerband compare to the 350z's? has anyone driven both to give a accurate comparison?
|
The difference is six. Sometimes seven but most of the time just six.
|
Actually i did see one time where it was five, but that is rare.
|
Quote:
|
The 350 is like, tooodllyyyy tam w0o0o0o, whereas the 370 is like, rabba rabba bam!
PS, I have both, so I know what I'm talking about. http://www.the370z.com/members/frost...ure3126-zs.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
now theres a highly technical term...take head all ye!!! "rabba rabba bam!" is that much faster than the 350z's :roflpuke2: sorry bro had to do it... |
1 Attachment(s)
hey here's the chart we ran when we got five
|
rabba rabba bam = 7
tooodllyyyy tam w0o0o0o = 6 (sometimes 5) |
You guys must have gotten Wednesday motors.. mine's definately 5.
|
Quote:
|
This was done by a mystery tuner, but it can now be revealed that Thing 1 is the 350 and Thing 2 the 370,,,,
http://images111.fotki.com/v733/phot...yno0001-vi.jpg |
Thing 2 is is vastly superior indeed. Can't argue with specs.
|
the technology is just so superior. less parts eaten by the workers = more numbers on the charts.
|
Quote:
|
I'm a little skeptical of the charts since they don't list tooodllyyyy tam w0o0o0o, OR rabba rabba bam rates.
|
Quote:
I had an '03 Z for 6 years, and I miss the bottom end grunt the 370Z sorta lacks. However, what the 370Z lacks on the bottom end it makes up past 3k RPM. It pulls hard to redline. The car definitely feels lighter on acceleration. [EDIT] A couple of shops here have posted up dyno charts for comparison. It has been tooo long. |
those are highly secret numbers the only way you can know them is to win iron chef america not once but seven times all in the same day.
|
Thing 1 seems to be running a bit rich judging by the spins curve, which is obviously why thing 2's numbers are superior!
|
Quote:
|
why havent we hit page 2 yet?!?
|
ok....i have to hit 900 post before i pass out htis fine evening :rolleyes:
|
^ almost there
|
Quote:
|
Are you trying to justify buying a 350Z instead of a 370Z?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
TQ numbers are 268 for the 50, 270 for the 70, so no difference really in TQ.
|
Quote:
|
tq curve for the VQ37 is flat, pulls hard through all ranges.
|
Quote:
|
z34
http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e2...dy_builder.jpg z33 http://i883.photobucket.com/albums/a...eybinaraga.jpg look at the cute little babyyyyy |
Epic thread. I approve.
|
Quote:
Therefore, what is happening when your motor reaches two and one quarter spins a dimensional shift produces multiple motor inputs on the graph demonstrated by multiple pound and torks readings simultaneously. |
That is a brilliant technical explanation.
|
Quote:
|
|
Not directed at anyone in general and just stating the obvious... You can't determine and compare power band by referencing peak figures like 306HP vs. 332HP and 268 lb-ft vs. 270 lb-ft. Those numbers mean nothing [to me].
The VQ35HR and VQ37VHR are very much alike, but the VHR has a bit more fancy computer gizmos to help it achieve a flatter torque band. So instead of peaky torque and power, you get something that's more consistent and linear throughout the range. So what I mean by the VQ37VHR not being as responsive down low is probably because for daily driving the throttle response is quite conservative. It's a different story when you floor it. So how do you think I feel? :D |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2