0-60 mph under 6 seconds for under $60,000
 

This post is a listing of 0-60 mph times under 6 seconds for:

- Vehicles under $60,000 (msrp)
- New Vehicles Only

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...-Dragstrip.jpg

reference: Bugatti Veyron 0-60 - 2.4 seconds

- - Under 4 Seconds - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Ford Shelby GT500 - 0-60 mph in 3.5

- - Under 5 Seconds - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Chevy Corvette - 4.0
Audi TT-RS - 4.1
Ford Mustang GT - 4.3
Chevrolet Camaro SS - 4.3
Chrysler 300 SRT8 - 4.3
Audi S4 - 4.7
Subaru Impreza WRX STI - 4.7
Subaru Impreza WRX - 4.7
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution GSR - 4.8
BMW Z4 35is - 4.8
Dodge Charger - 4.9

- - Under 6 Seconds - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Hyundai Genesis 3.8 R-Spec - 5.0
Nissan 370z - 0-60 mph in 5.1 :stirthepot:
BMW 135i - 5.1
Volvo S60 R - 5.3
BMW 335i - 5.4
Ford Focus ST - 5.9

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

reference: Volkswagen GTI - 0-60 mph in 6.1

Suggestions welcome!! ...remember MSRP under $60k.

V8, turbo, V8, supercharged...etc etc etc. Now: :wtf2:

Are we sure these numbers are all standing and do not include one foot roll out?

Weird post times i usually rip mustangs gt's and genesises and wrx's n stuff like that, all i got is an oil cooler.

That is kinda what i was thinking... I think the the Z time is from a stop.

one foot roll out maybe 4.9

If those numbers are from the major auto magazines, they might be a little optimistic. Manufacturers always seem to give them the factory freaks, or just give them ringers to get the good numbers.

don't try a new 5.0....

ford din't f*ck around with that car

HEY stay on topic please :tup:

NOPE, just made a listing based on my Google-ing. :tiphat:

They all include rollout.

should be noted that the S60 R doesn't actually exist any more. it is now the "R design". doesn't denote any more power

Suzuki Haybusa - GSX-1300R - 0-60 in 2.6 seconds.

:gtfo2:


No bikes for you.

Whats the source of those numbers? I typically use 0-60 Times | 0 to 60 MPH and Quarter Mile Times for Fast Sports Cars, Muscle Cars, Luxury Car Performance Stats & more! for a quick check. They list the 370 as 4.5s

Here's one for the list
2013 Porsche Caymen 0-60 mph: 5.4 s $52.6K Starting price

G37

No offense to the OP, but this thread is kinda stupid. If you're gonna magazine race, go with 1/4 times and trap speeds....heck, even lap times (you even posted a pic of a tree at a drag strip for Christ sake). 0-60 times is for people who only pretend to know anything about cars. It's a bit childish to be honest.

Well if this isn't your flavor... perhaps $/hp is more of your liking?

And yes, saying this is stupid is offensive. :icon23:

was not specified in original post sooooooo :p

i thought magazine spec-racing was for civic folks. :shakes head:

Racing? nah, just made a list. Racing is done with the engine running, thank you :tup:

why are 3 out of our first 5 threads comparing the z to every car in a straight line and in hp....

2010 Infiniti G37 Sport Coupe 0-60 mph 5.2 Quarter mile 13.7

because someone was probably gang raped by rich kids with faster cars... on paper.

what if i write the Z does 0-60 in 3.1 seconds on a piece of paper.... are we faster then??

I use 0-60 times when comparing cars, though it's clearly not the end-all be-all statistic. I do have some personal criteria though.

- try to stick with the same source for times. Mags will run a car over and over in various ways until they get THE fastest time they can eke out of a run. That's the number they use. It might not be a practical number for most of us that don't drag. Every source runs differently and with different numbers. But as long as you're measuring with the same test, you can do some valid comparisons. (test road, test driver(s), conditions, altitude, stockness...)

- mag times aren't going to be times that I experience on the road. But it still does demonstrate straight line speed in a test. *shrug*

- It's not a "stupid" statistic. :rolleyes: It's not the only statistic, but it's not a stupid one.

- I don't "race" my car, so it's not like I have firsthand times on hand, just like a large majority of drivers. I'll let someone else "race" the car and come back with times. Just because that happens, doesn't make the statistic "stupid."

5.1 is without rollout on 370Z (Edmonds). 1 foot rollout gets under 5 seconds.

I say no rollout. And I like citing one source vs cherry picking each magazine and manufacturer for best times.

It doesn't matter really. I've got a Z and it is what it is. Wonderful. :tup:

hayabusas are absolute garbage! take your chromed out, lowered, stretch, paper weight to the dump.

and my bone stock z has beat multiple 5.0 stangs.

Nope. The Edmunds site clearly states the 5.1 is will 1' rollout.

Track Tested: 2009 Nissan Nismo 370Z vs. 2009 Nissan 370Z Touring


There are very few places that report 0-60 without rollout.

I could have swore the Z auto is 4.7

0-60 times vary dramatically depending on a huge variety of factors, and they're generally of very little value.

Every time a turn is involved I bet. I see them holding up traffic on winding roads nearly every day.

You are looking at the Nismo which is slower.
Non Nismo is located below, yes at 5.2 (not 5.1 as I said) standing and 4.9 with rollout.

Test Results:
0 - 30 (sec): 2.0
0 - 45 (sec): 3.5
0 - 60 (sec): 5.2
0 - 75 (sec): 7.6
1/4 Mile (sec @ mph): 13.5 @ 103.7
0-60 with 1-ft Rollout (sec): 4.9

Never said they were.

Anyway, the auto Z is a sub 5 second car and it should be noted.

Mustang Driver Fail..
A 5.0 beats a 370z 9/10, especially a stock one. Even full bolt on Z would have a hard time hanging..

Everytime I have been to the track, or watched videos, 5.0's are pullin HARD.

Roger that.

Since I'm bored at work. This is what I'm going to do for ya'll folks.

HP 0-60 1/4 Hp/lb

Lamborghini Aventador - 700@8250 2.9 10.8 0.202 $404195
Ford Shelby GT500 - 662@6500 3.5 11.5 0.172 $54800
vette Stingray (base) - 430@5900 3.8 12 0.13 $51000
Audi TT-RS - 360@5500 3.5 11.9 0.109 $58095
Cadillac CTS-V - 556@6100 4.0 12.1 0.132 $65410
Chevrolet Camaro SS - 426@5900 4.3 12.5 0.108 $37750
Lexus IS F - 416@6600 4.2 12.6 0.110 $62660
Dodge Charger SRT Super Bee - 470@6000 4.1 12.5 0.1076 $44475
Chrysler 300 SRT8 - 470@6000 4.3 12.6 0.1076 $50475
BMW M3 - 414@8300 4.2 12.5 0.112 $62295
BMW Z4 35is - 335@5900 4.3 13.1 0.094 $65095
Porsche Boxster S - 315@6700 4.3 12.7 0.108 $61050
Porsche Cayman S - 325@7400 4.4 12.8 0.111 $64750
Nissan 370z NISMO - 350@7400 4.4 13.1 0.1047 $43000
Subaru Impreza WRX STI - 305@6000 4.8 13.2 0.089 $38415
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution GSR - 291@6500 4.8 13.6 0.082 $35490
Hyundai Genesis 3.8 R-Spec - 344@6400 5.0 13.5 0.10 $29645
BMW 135i - 300@5800 5.0 13.6 0.089 $40195
Volvo S60 R - 325@6500 5.1 13.6 0.084 $44995

Data from all kinds of sources. Just for fun. Hope this will help

Quoting from Nissan 0-60 Times & Nissan Quarter Mile Times | Nissan Skyline GTR 0-60, Maxima SV, Juke, 2013 Altima SE-R, Murano SL, 350z, 2014 370z and Titan 0 to 60 stats!
2009 Nissan NISMO 370Z 0-60 mph 4.5 Quarter Mile 13.0

2009 Nissan 370Z (Automatic) 0-60 mph 4.5 Quarter Mile 12.9

2010 Nissan 370Z Roadster 0-60 mph 4.7

2010 Nissan NISMO 370Z 0-60 mph 4.4

2010 Nissan 370Z Roadster Touring 0-60 mph 5.0 Quarter Mile 13.5

2011 Nissan 370Z 0-60 mph 4.6 Quarter Mile 13.0

2012 Nissan 370Z GT Edition 0-60 mph 5.1

you mean the ones from the 80s?

No, the brand spanking new ones. This is on a winding mountain road where they hold up SUV's and vans too. Not off the line where they absolutely shine.

I'd love to report the opposite. If it ever happens I will but even my Mustang buddy who stayed at my place two weeks, depressingly noted the same thing.

If they're holding up SUVs and vans, it doesn't sound like a car issue.