![]() |
2009 and 2010 TT-S models didn't have any engine changes made so they are both just as fast hitting the 0-60 in about 4.8-4.9 range. The one thing that could've
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#16 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: mission,tx
Posts: 58
Drives: '11 MK6 GTI
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
![]()
2009 and 2010 TT-S models didn't have any engine changes made so they are both just as fast hitting the 0-60 in about 4.8-4.9 range. The one thing that could've played a role in the times you looked up was a transmission update that was needed. My friend has a 2009 TT-S and trust me that thing holds it's own across the whole powerband. I've driven it and it is in no way slow after 60 mph. MS3 is not as fast as TT-S, period.
Edit: I'm pretty sure your 5.6 time is of the convertible TT-S not coupe.. |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
370Z Sport Package | bossman | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 16 | 11-11-2010 12:05 PM |
Honda S2000 vs BMW 135i vs Nissan 370Z vs Porsche Cayman S vs Porsche 911 | JvKintheUSA | Nissan 370Z Photos / Spyshots / Video / Media Gallery | 2 | 08-04-2009 01:48 PM |
Rejected: 30.5k for 370z with sport package | nexus4400 | Nissan 370Z Pricing / Ordering Discussions | 13 | 05-12-2009 06:00 PM |
Sport Package Brake Test vs Non-Sport Package | hey32g | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 9 | 04-11-2009 11:23 PM |
Best Motoring Brake Test: 370Z vs 135i vs S2000 vs Cayman S | AK370Z | Nissan 370Z General Discussions | 10 | 03-20-2009 03:51 PM |