![]() |
Not the first time Nissan played with the V8 Z Car idea. IMO it won't happen with the 370Z. Wouldn't make sense with the GTR now in the mix not
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 (permalink) |
Base Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 224
Drives: 300
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
![]()
Not the first time Nissan played with the V8 Z Car idea. IMO it won't happen with the 370Z. Wouldn't make sense with the GTR now in the mix not to mention the world economy in the state it's in.
Here's Paul Newman's V8 280ZX race car. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Nissan has no offering in the 40k to 50k sports car segment . Nissan has yet to address this segment--base Corvette (430HP), Dodge Challenger SRT-8 (425HP), Camaro Z28 SS (420HP), Ford Shelby GT500 (500HP), etc., etc. Nissan's VK50VE, which is based on the VQ V6, would fit this segment nicely with 390HP & 369 lb-ft of torque. Price it just below the base Corvette and Nissan will have another awesome machine at an incredible bargain in this price segment. And 390HP is nowhere near the 485HP of the GTR--so don't give any silly arguments of how a V8 Z car would be a threat to the GTR. Like I said--apples to oranges. Why a V8? The answer is simple. Purist Sports Car . (No forced induction wizardry, bells & whistles, & techno gizmos to make power). Incidentally, it would be the polar opposite of the GTR. A purist sports car--N/A V8 Z would embody a purist approach to driving enjoyment combined with agressive looks, great handling, and a gorgeous exhaust note. It would represent an outstanding/best in class value in this segment. Nissan! If you build it, we will buy it! Last edited by sbsmoov; 12-15-2008 at 06:18 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 224
Drives: 300
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Sorry, there will be no V8 Z Car. ![]() Last edited by zsport1; 12-15-2008 at 06:12 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Yes the Z has always been a "bang for the buck" sports car. And it would still represent the best bang for the buck in the 40k-50k segment if priced below every other competitor in that segment. That is the point i'm trying to get across! In other words, there's a huge gap in Nissan's sports car portfolio--there's no offering to fill the empty space bewteen the 370z and the GTR. Maybe it should be an entirely new car, but that gap should be filled. Last edited by sbsmoov; 12-15-2008 at 06:58 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 224
Drives: 300
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
This has nothing to do with cars, but i'm bringing it up to make a point. Do you remember Sony's Betamax versus JVC's VHS format war? Do you think Blu-Ray would exist today if Sony looked back at their defeat in 1988 and concluded that they should not introduce Blu-Ray because in all likelihood it would meet the same fate as betamax? Using your "passed performance" logic, that is what Sony should have done. Well we all know what happened. ![]() Last edited by sbsmoov; 12-15-2008 at 08:09 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 (permalink) | |
Base Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 224
Drives: 300
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 (permalink) | |
A True Z Fanatic
|
![]() Quote:
But to each his/her own - Nissan has been catering to the North America market so who know's what will actually happen.... its just nice to see |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|