Nissan 370Z Forum

Nissan 370Z Forum (http://www.the370z.com/)
-   Nissan 370Z General Discussions (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/)
-   -   370z is aesthetically a masterpiece (http://www.the370z.com/nissan-370z-general-discussions/68854-370z-aesthetically-masterpiece.html)

m4a1mustang 03-26-2013 09:37 AM

Very nice!

I never dropped mine, but I added spacers, which really helped with the look. Got rid of most of the tuck.

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-U...hala%25204.jpg

And of course "in action" the ride height took care of itself!

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-8...mall%25203.jpg

m4a1mustang 03-26-2013 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UNKNOWN_370 (Post 2233779)
So you think a car that is $33k, a v6 and in the low 13 second quarters stock. Which is like 3/10ths or less behind the v8 competition. By nature should have been a 11.5/12.3 second car stock??? That's where it should've been???

Wow... I think you're expectations run higher than reality bruh? :ugh2:

No need to go off on him, man. It's reasonable to wish the car made more power out of the box. No big deal!

cheshirecat 03-26-2013 09:39 AM

^looks fantastic. Just wish it had 20% more power from factory. I can understand why people go from this vehicle to 400hp+ cars, not that you would know :P

cheshirecat 03-26-2013 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UNKNOWN_370 (Post 2233779)
So you think a car that is $33k, a v6 and in the low 13 second quarters stock. Which is like 3/10ths or less behind the v8 competition. By nature should have been a 11.5/12.3 second car stock??? That's where it should've been???
Wow... I think you're expectations run higher than reality bruh? :ugh2:

Yes? My expectations aren't that high. Do you really think a DI TT 3.0 for approx 35k is "higher than reality"?

I guess the next Z is going to blow your mind when it bows with 30 more hp. Either that, or you're easily impressed.

Also: relax.

UNKNOWN_370 03-26-2013 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m4a1mustang (Post 2233784)
No need to go off on him, man. It's reasonable to wish the car made more power out of the box. No big deal!

I'm not going off. But you gotta look at the engine of the car you bought before you criticize it. This is a 3.7L v6. Not a 5.0 or 6.2 litre v8. I drove so many cars before i bought the Z. some of those cars I test drove were a shytload faster. I chose the Z for other reasons.
I wish to a degree the Z were faster. But I don't think nissan installed a letdown amount of power either.
To act like Nissan should've put more power of the bat is unreasonable considering all the variables of what the Z is. And we have companies like GTM and Fast Intentions handling their business for us. Giving us loads of power and supercar track times. $10k is not a lot for the kind of power boost FI is giving.

UNKNOWN_370 03-26-2013 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheshirecat (Post 2233789)
Yes? My expectations aren't that high. Do you really think a DI TT 3.0 for approx 35k is "higher than reality"?

I guess the next Z is going to blow your mind when it bows with 30 more hp. Either that, or you're easily impressed.

Also: relax.

My response is to the factory power part. Not the future... I want the next Z to be FI for the same reasons you do. But I just don't feel this V6 is underpowered.

Why should I relax if I'm not yelling at you or anything. I'm not insulting or going off the wall... I'm just sayin.

JungleZ 03-26-2013 09:59 AM

This car looks amazing but Chris Harris review was right, the car is scary to drive in stock form, rough coarse engine sloppy shifting

edub370 03-26-2013 10:02 AM

rear 3/4 views of this car really do it the most justice. also, just needs decatted to get rid of that factory tractor engine feel up top in the revs.

m4a1mustang 03-26-2013 10:04 AM

I always felt like some people want the Z to be more than what it really is. In stock form, it's just a good compromise car. It combines power with agility. Think taking a 5.0 and a S2000 and putting them together... you get something like the 370Z.

Yes, it's not the fastest and it doesn't have the best handling, but it gives you just enough of both, IMO, to satisfy most people. This is something I never really appreciated until after owning both the 5.0 and S2000.

Now, is it possible you can be the best at everything? Probably. I think the C7 might get close to that level... but it's going to be a $60K + car. For the money, the Z is a pretty good value for someone that wants a good GT-style car. Not a full-on sports car or a full-on power car, but rather a well put together combination of both.

There are some small things I can nitpick over, but at the end of the day I appreciate it for what it is.

cheshirecat 03-26-2013 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by edub370 (Post 2233836)
rear 3/4 views of this car really do it the most justice. alos, just needs decatted to get rid of that factory tractor engine feel up top in the revs.

Agreed. I think the front is even pretty nice with a lip kit. Too round without it.

The VQ is a pretty coarse engine up top, but that is kind of the nature of high-revving V6's (more or less). I do think they should do better, as this is one of the most criticized features of the engine in reviews.

A great car is only as strong as the weakest link in the chain. Luckily for the 370, that link is pretty far down the line, but it does exist.

MX52Z 03-26-2013 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XiP (Post 2233713)
Title should have been "Do you regret that the 370z is aesthetically a masterpiece?"
:stirthepot:

Muahahaha

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheshirecat (Post 2233772)

Damn, that's nice.

Jordo! 03-26-2013 10:14 AM

Really, other than a few Porshces (and I HATE the bug-eyed headlights) the only other car that I like the lines better on would have to be a hardtop Z4.

That's good company for a humble Datusn to keep;a respectable, and high scoring 2nd place winner.

If Toyota/Subaru had made the "Scion concept" the primary body style (Prototype v. 3.0, rather than 2.0), I might have put the twins ahead of the Z, but given the final product we got, I place it at a comfortably distant 3rd.

ZMan8 03-26-2013 10:15 AM

:iagree: the car is just pretty.

on the subject of power, i think more so than hp it needs more torque. I think for a small sports car 330-380 bhp is plenty enough. Most people complain about the lack of "neck snapping" acceleration and that's something more torque would fix. In a good world the next z would be 3100 lbs, 370 bhp, 350 torque

Haboob 03-26-2013 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m4a1mustang (Post 2233781)
Very nice!

I never dropped mine, but I added spacers, which really helped with the look. Got rid of most of the tuck.

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-U...hala%25204.jpg

And of course "in action" the ride height took care of itself!

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-8...mall%25203.jpg

What size spacers did you go with there? Just ordered 20mm all around for mine, can't wait to get a more flush look from the wheels & panels.

m4a1mustang 03-26-2013 10:17 AM

I think I did 15/20.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2